• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

采用膀胱颈前管状结构进行尿道内括约肌重建用于机器人辅助和腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术:改善早期控尿恢复情况

Internal urethral sphincter reconstruction with anterior bladder neck tube for robotic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: improving early return of continence.

作者信息

Xu Zhibin, Zhao Jie, Guan Zhenghui, Guo Maomao, Bian Hao, Li Zhenchi, Zhao Wenchao, Liang Sudong, Liu Yu, Zhang Siyang, Wang Jiangping

机构信息

Department of Urology, The Affiliated Taizhou People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou School of Clinical Medicine, Nanjing Medical University, Taizhou, China.

出版信息

Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jun 30;13(6):994-1003. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-583. Epub 2024 Jun 26.

DOI:10.21037/tau-23-583
PMID:38983476
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11228678/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In recent years, despite several surgical techniques having been applied, the early incontinence rate after radical prostatectomy (RP) remains high. In this study, we reconstructed an internal urethral sphincter (IUS) with anterior bladder neck tube (ABNT) to improve early return of continence and find a more effective technique for early urinary incontinence after RP.

METHODS

In this study, 96 previous patients who did not receive an ABNT between October 2018 and May 2020 were compared as historical controls (the control group). A total of 210 consecutive patients underwent robotic or laparoscopic RP with ABNT between May 2020 and February 2023 (the ABNT group). The inclusion criteria included Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score 0-1 and localized prostate cancer (clinical stages cT1-3, cN0, cM0). The exclusion criteria included patients with diabetes, neurologic diseases, previous pelvic operations, symptoms of urinary incontinence, prior radiation, focal therapy, or androgen deprivation therapy for prostate cancer. ABNT was reconducted with a U-shaped flap from the anterior wall of the bladder neck, and was then anastomosed with the urethra. In the control group, the bladder outlet was directly anastomosed with the urethra. Continence, as defined if 0 pads were used per day and International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire-Short Form (ICIQ-SF) score ≤6, was assessed at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks after catheter removal. At 2 weeks after catheter removal, urethral pressure profilometry (UPP) and upright urethrography were performed to evaluate the function of ABNT in the ABNT group.

RESULTS

More patients in the ABNT group were continent than those in the control group at 1 week (85.2% 22.9%, P<0.001), 4 weeks (91.4% 27.1%, P<0.001), 8 weeks (95.2% 40.6%, P<0.001), 12 weeks (100% 71.9%, P<0.001), and at 24 weeks (100% 87.5%, P<0.001) after catheter removal. Stricture was presented in 5.2% and 2.1% (P=0.34) in the ABNT group and control group, respectively. UPP showed that a functional IUS was reconstructed with ABNT. Upright urethrography showed that the ABNT was filled with contrast medium in the urination period and with no contrast medium during the storage period and interruption of urination.

CONCLUSIONS

The ABNT technique significantly improved early return of continence in comparison with the no ABNT technique, especially the immediate continence. The ABNT technique reconstructed the functional IUS with acceptable urethral stricture. The limitations of the present study include that the comparison was conducted retrospectively with a historical cohort and lack of randomization, and the single center setting. A prospective, randomized, and multicenter evaluation is expected.

摘要

背景

近年来,尽管已应用多种手术技术,但根治性前列腺切除术(RP)后早期尿失禁发生率仍居高不下。在本研究中,我们采用膀胱颈前管(ABNT)重建尿道内括约肌(IUS),以改善控尿功能的早期恢复,并寻找一种更有效的RP术后早期尿失禁治疗技术。

方法

本研究将2018年10月至2020年5月期间96例未接受ABNT的既往患者作为历史对照(对照组)。2020年5月至2023年2月期间,共有210例连续患者接受了机器人或腹腔镜下ABNT辅助的RP手术(ABNT组)。纳入标准包括东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分为0 - 1分且为局限性前列腺癌(临床分期cT1 - 3、cN0、cM0)。排除标准包括患有糖尿病、神经系统疾病、既往盆腔手术史、尿失禁症状、既往放疗、局部治疗或前列腺癌雄激素剥夺治疗的患者。采用膀胱颈前壁的U形皮瓣重建ABNT,然后与尿道吻合。对照组则将膀胱出口直接与尿道吻合。拔除导尿管后1、4、8、12和24周评估控尿情况,定义为每日使用尿垫数为0且国际尿失禁咨询委员会简表(ICIQ - SF)评分≤6。在拔除导尿管后2周,对ABNT组患者进行尿道压力测定(UPP)和直立尿道造影,以评估ABNT的功能。

结果

ABNT组在拔除导尿管后1周(85.2%对22.9%,P < 0.001)、4周(91.4%对27.1%,P < 0.001)、8周(95.2%对40.6%,P < 0.001)、12周(100%对71.9%,P < 0.001)和24周(100%对87.5%,P < 0.001)时,控尿患者均多于对照组。ABNT组和对照组尿道狭窄发生率分别为5.2%和2.1%(P = 0.34)。UPP显示ABNT重建了功能性IUS。直立尿道造影显示,排尿期ABNT内充满造影剂,储尿期及排尿中断时无造影剂。

结论

与未使用ABNT技术相比,ABNT技术显著改善了控尿功能的早期恢复,尤其是即刻控尿。ABNT技术重建了功能性IUS,尿道狭窄发生率可接受。本研究的局限性在于采用历史队列进行回顾性比较且缺乏随机分组,以及为单中心研究。期待进行前瞻性、随机、多中心评估。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/06654bcbc578/tau-13-06-994-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/50cb9c47db04/tau-13-06-994-vid1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/8c546a280366/tau-13-06-994-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/f42a9b72aa49/tau-13-06-994-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/7988fb3e6c9a/tau-13-06-994-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/331e10955fb5/tau-13-06-994-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/356e1a43758e/tau-13-06-994-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/c24ce7336263/tau-13-06-994-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/81422bed26fb/tau-13-06-994-vid2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/06654bcbc578/tau-13-06-994-f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/50cb9c47db04/tau-13-06-994-vid1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/8c546a280366/tau-13-06-994-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/f42a9b72aa49/tau-13-06-994-f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/7988fb3e6c9a/tau-13-06-994-f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/331e10955fb5/tau-13-06-994-f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/356e1a43758e/tau-13-06-994-f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/c24ce7336263/tau-13-06-994-f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/81422bed26fb/tau-13-06-994-vid2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e87/11228678/06654bcbc578/tau-13-06-994-f7.jpg

相似文献

1
Internal urethral sphincter reconstruction with anterior bladder neck tube for robotic and laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: improving early return of continence.采用膀胱颈前管状结构进行尿道内括约肌重建用于机器人辅助和腹腔镜下根治性前列腺切除术:改善早期控尿恢复情况
Transl Androl Urol. 2024 Jun 30;13(6):994-1003. doi: 10.21037/tau-23-583. Epub 2024 Jun 26.
2
Urethral pressure profile before radical prostatectomy as a predictor of early postoperative continence.根治性前列腺切除术前尿道压力图作为术后早期控尿的预测指标。
Neurourol Urodyn. 2022 Aug;41(6):1431-1439. doi: 10.1002/nau.24978. Epub 2022 Jun 7.
3
Urethral-fixation technique improves early urinary continence recovery in patients who undergo retropubic radical prostatectomy.尿道固定技术可改善接受耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术患者的早期尿失禁恢复情况。
BJU Int. 2017 Feb;119(2):245-253. doi: 10.1111/bju.13514. Epub 2016 Jun 2.
4
Synthetic sling or artificial urinary sphincter for men with urodynamic stress incontinence after prostate surgery: the MASTER non-inferiority RCT.前列腺手术后尿动力学压力性尿失禁男性患者使用合成吊带或人工尿道括约肌:MASTER 非劣效 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Aug;26(36):1-152. doi: 10.3310/TBFZ0277.
5
Early Catheter Removal after Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Surgical Technique and Outcomes for the Aalst Technique (ECaRemA Study).机器人辅助前列腺根治术后早期拔除导尿管:Aalst 技术的手术技术和结果(ECaRemA 研究)。
Eur Urol. 2016 May;69(5):917-23. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2015.09.052. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
6
Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the Novel Urethral Fixation Technique Versus Standard Vesicourethral Anastomosis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术采用新型尿道固定技术与标准膀胱尿道吻合术的比较。
Eur Urol. 2021 Apr;79(4):530-536. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.028. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
7
Preservation of the smooth muscular internal (vesical) sphincter and of the proximal urethra for the early recovery of urinary continence after retropubic radical prostatectomy: a prospective case-control study.保留耻骨后前列腺根治术后早期恢复尿控的平滑肌内(膀胱)括约肌和近端尿道:一项前瞻性病例对照研究。
Int J Urol. 2014 Feb;21(2):157-62. doi: 10.1111/iju.12206. Epub 2013 Jun 26.
8
Improvement in early urinary continence recovery after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy based on postoperative pelvic anatomic features: a retrospective review.基于术后盆腔解剖特征的机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后早期尿控恢复的改善:一项回顾性研究。
BMC Urol. 2019 Sep 18;19(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12894-019-0519-8.
9
Integrity of the Urethral Sphincter Complex, Nerve-sparing, and Long-term Continence Status after Robotic-assisted Radical Prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后尿道括约肌复合体的完整性、保留神经和长期控尿状态。
Eur Urol Focus. 2019 Sep;5(5):823-830. doi: 10.1016/j.euf.2018.04.021.
10
Efficacy of an assisted low-intensity programme of perioperative pelvic floor muscle training in improving the recovery of continence after radical prostatectomy: a randomized controlled trial.辅助性低强度围手术期盆底肌训练方案对改善根治性前列腺切除术后控尿功能恢复的疗效:一项随机对照试验。
BJU Int. 2012 Oct;110(7):1004-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.10948.x. Epub 2012 Feb 14.

本文引用的文献

1
Full functional-length urethral sphincter- and neurovascular bundle preservation improves long-term continence rates after robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy.全功能长度的尿道括约肌和神经血管束保留可提高机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后的长期控尿率。
J Robot Surg. 2023 Feb;17(1):177-184. doi: 10.1007/s11701-022-01408-7. Epub 2022 Apr 22.
2
Functional and quality of life outcomes of localised prostate cancer treatments (Prostate Testing for Cancer and Treatment [ProtecT] study).局限性前列腺癌治疗的功能和生活质量结局(前列腺癌检测和治疗研究 [ProtecT])。
BJU Int. 2022 Sep;130(3):370-380. doi: 10.1111/bju.15739. Epub 2022 May 3.
3
Predictors for lower urinary tract symptoms in patients underwent radical prostatectomy: implications for postoperative nursing care.
根治性前列腺切除术患者下尿路症状的预测因素:对术后护理的启示。
J Clin Nurs. 2022 May;31(9-10):1267-1272. doi: 10.1111/jocn.15981. Epub 2021 Sep 12.
4
Comparative effectiveness of robotic and open radical prostatectomy.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术与开放性根治性前列腺切除术的疗效比较。
Transl Androl Urol. 2021 May;10(5):2158-2170. doi: 10.21037/tau.2019.12.01.
5
Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy Using the Novel Urethral Fixation Technique Versus Standard Vesicourethral Anastomosis.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术采用新型尿道固定技术与标准膀胱尿道吻合术的比较。
Eur Urol. 2021 Apr;79(4):530-536. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.01.028. Epub 2021 Feb 4.
6
Retzius-Sparing versus Standard Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Comparative Prospective Study of Nearly 500 Patients.保留Retzius 间隙与标准机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术:近 500 例患者的前瞻性比较研究。
J Urol. 2021 Mar;205(3):780-790. doi: 10.1097/JU.0000000000001435. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
7
Urethral realignment with maximal urethral length and bladder neck preservation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: Urinary continence recovery.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中保持最大尿道长度和膀胱颈以进行尿道重排:尿控恢复。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 13;15(1):e0227744. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227744. eCollection 2020.
8
Posterior, Anterior, and Periurethral Surgical Reconstruction of Urinary Continence Mechanisms in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: A Description and Video Compilation of Commonly Performed Surgical Techniques.机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术中尿控机制的后、前和尿道周围外科重建:常用手术技术的描述和视频汇编。
Eur Urol. 2019 Dec;76(6):814-822. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2018.11.035. Epub 2018 Dec 2.
9
Systematic Review of Studies Reporting Positive Surgical Margins After Bladder Neck Sparing Radical Prostatectomy.保留膀胱颈根治性前列腺切除术后切缘阳性相关研究的系统评价
Curr Urol Rep. 2017 Nov 7;18(12):99. doi: 10.1007/s11934-017-0745-0.
10
Advanced Reconstruction of Vesicourethral Support (ARVUS) during Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy: One-year Functional Outcomes in a Two-group Randomised Controlled Trial.机器人辅助前列腺根治术中的高级膀胱尿道支撑重建(ARVUS):一项两臂随机对照试验的一年功能结局。
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):822-830. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.05.032. Epub 2016 Jun 6.