Department of Speech, Language, & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.
Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Dec 10;61(12):2917-2933. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0363.
We examined receptive verb knowledge in 22- to 24-month-old toddlers with a dynamic video eye-tracking test. The primary goal of the study was to examine the utility of eye-gaze measures that are commonly used to study noun knowledge for studying verb knowledge.
Forty typically developing toddlers participated. They viewed 2 videos side by side (e.g., girl clapping, same girl stretching) and were asked to find one of them (e.g., "Where is she clapping?"). Their eye-gaze, recorded by a Tobii T60XL eye-tracking system, was analyzed as a measure of their knowledge of the verb meanings. Noun trials were included as controls. We examined correlations between eye-gaze measures and score on the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI; Fenson et al., 1994), a standard parent report measure of expressive vocabulary to see how well various eye-gaze measures predicted CDI score.
A common measure of knowledge-a 15% increase in looking time to the target video from a baseline phase to the test phase-did correlate with CDI score but operationalized differently for verbs than for nouns. A 2nd common measure, latency of 1st look to the target, correlated with CDI score for nouns, as in previous work, but did not for verbs. A 3rd measure, fixation density, correlated for both nouns and verbs, although the correlation went in different directions.
The dynamic nature of videos depicting verb knowledge results in differences in eye-gaze as compared to static images depicting nouns. An eye-tracking assessment of verb knowledge is worthwhile to develop. However, the particular dependent measures used may be different than those used for static images and nouns.
我们使用动态视频眼动追踪测试检查了 22 至 24 个月大的幼儿的接受动词知识。该研究的主要目的是检验常用于研究名词知识的眼动测量方法在研究动词知识方面的有效性。
40 名典型发展的幼儿参与了研究。他们并排观看了 2 个视频(例如,女孩拍手,同一个女孩伸展),并被要求找出其中一个(例如,“她在哪里拍手?”)。他们的眼动由 Tobii T60XL 眼动追踪系统记录,作为他们动词含义知识的测量。名词试验也包含在内作为对照。我们检查了眼动测量值与 MacArthur-Bates 交际发展量表(CDI;Fenson 等人,1994)之间的相关性,CDI 是一种标准的父母报告测量方法,用于评估表达词汇量,以了解各种眼动测量值在多大程度上可以预测 CDI 得分。
一种常见的知识测量方法-与基线阶段相比,在测试阶段观看目标视频的时间增加 15%-与 CDI 得分相关,但动词的操作方式与名词不同。另一种常见的测量方法,即首次注视目标的潜伏期,与名词的 CDI 得分相关,与之前的工作一致,但与动词无关。第三种测量方法,注视密度,与名词和动词都相关,尽管相关性的方向不同。
描述动词知识的视频的动态性质与描述名词的静态图像相比,导致眼动的差异。开发动词知识的眼动评估是值得的。然而,特定的因变量测量方法可能与静态图像和名词的使用方法不同。