Suppr超能文献

婴幼儿接受动词知识的眼动研究

An Eye-Tracking Study of Receptive Verb Knowledge in Toddlers.

机构信息

Department of Speech, Language, & Hearing Sciences, Boston University, MA.

Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Michigan State University, East Lansing.

出版信息

J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Dec 10;61(12):2917-2933. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0363.

Abstract

PURPOSE

We examined receptive verb knowledge in 22- to 24-month-old toddlers with a dynamic video eye-tracking test. The primary goal of the study was to examine the utility of eye-gaze measures that are commonly used to study noun knowledge for studying verb knowledge.

METHOD

Forty typically developing toddlers participated. They viewed 2 videos side by side (e.g., girl clapping, same girl stretching) and were asked to find one of them (e.g., "Where is she clapping?"). Their eye-gaze, recorded by a Tobii T60XL eye-tracking system, was analyzed as a measure of their knowledge of the verb meanings. Noun trials were included as controls. We examined correlations between eye-gaze measures and score on the MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (CDI; Fenson et al., 1994), a standard parent report measure of expressive vocabulary to see how well various eye-gaze measures predicted CDI score.

RESULTS

A common measure of knowledge-a 15% increase in looking time to the target video from a baseline phase to the test phase-did correlate with CDI score but operationalized differently for verbs than for nouns. A 2nd common measure, latency of 1st look to the target, correlated with CDI score for nouns, as in previous work, but did not for verbs. A 3rd measure, fixation density, correlated for both nouns and verbs, although the correlation went in different directions.

CONCLUSIONS

The dynamic nature of videos depicting verb knowledge results in differences in eye-gaze as compared to static images depicting nouns. An eye-tracking assessment of verb knowledge is worthwhile to develop. However, the particular dependent measures used may be different than those used for static images and nouns.

摘要

目的

我们使用动态视频眼动追踪测试检查了 22 至 24 个月大的幼儿的接受动词知识。该研究的主要目的是检验常用于研究名词知识的眼动测量方法在研究动词知识方面的有效性。

方法

40 名典型发展的幼儿参与了研究。他们并排观看了 2 个视频(例如,女孩拍手,同一个女孩伸展),并被要求找出其中一个(例如,“她在哪里拍手?”)。他们的眼动由 Tobii T60XL 眼动追踪系统记录,作为他们动词含义知识的测量。名词试验也包含在内作为对照。我们检查了眼动测量值与 MacArthur-Bates 交际发展量表(CDI;Fenson 等人,1994)之间的相关性,CDI 是一种标准的父母报告测量方法,用于评估表达词汇量,以了解各种眼动测量值在多大程度上可以预测 CDI 得分。

结果

一种常见的知识测量方法-与基线阶段相比,在测试阶段观看目标视频的时间增加 15%-与 CDI 得分相关,但动词的操作方式与名词不同。另一种常见的测量方法,即首次注视目标的潜伏期,与名词的 CDI 得分相关,与之前的工作一致,但与动词无关。第三种测量方法,注视密度,与名词和动词都相关,尽管相关性的方向不同。

结论

描述动词知识的视频的动态性质与描述名词的静态图像相比,导致眼动的差异。开发动词知识的眼动评估是值得的。然而,特定的因变量测量方法可能与静态图像和名词的使用方法不同。

相似文献

1
An Eye-Tracking Study of Receptive Verb Knowledge in Toddlers.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018 Dec 10;61(12):2917-2933. doi: 10.1044/2018_JSLHR-L-17-0363.
2
Assessing receptive verb knowledge in late talkers and autistic children: advances and cautionary tales.
J Neurodev Disord. 2023 Dec 13;15(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s11689-023-09512-x.
3
The Origins of Verb Learning: Preverbal and Postverbal Infants' Learning of Word-Action Relations.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017 Dec 20;60(12):3538-3550. doi: 10.1044/2017_JSLHR-L-17-0085.
4
5
Toddlers' Verb Lexicon Diversity and Grammatical Outcomes.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2016 Jan;47(1):44-58. doi: 10.1044/2015_LSHSS-15-0018.
6
Two pathways in vocabulary development: Large-scale differences in noun and verb semantic structure.
Cogn Psychol. 2023 Jun;143:101574. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2023.101574. Epub 2023 May 18.
7
The formulation of argument structure in SLI: an eye-movement study.
Clin Linguist Phon. 2013 Feb;27(2):111-33. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2012.751623.
8
Nouns before verbs in comprehension vs. production: the view from pragmatics.
J Child Lang. 2000 Oct;27(3):501-20. doi: 10.1017/s0305000900004244.
9
The Relation Between Early Parent Verb Input and Later Expressive Verb Vocabulary in Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019 Jun 19;62(6):1787-1797. doi: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-L-18-0081. Epub 2019 May 21.
10
Verb-Mediated Prediction in Bilingual Toddlers.
Front Psychol. 2021 Nov 11;12:719447. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.719447. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing receptive verb knowledge in late talkers and autistic children: advances and cautionary tales.
J Neurodev Disord. 2023 Dec 13;15(1):44. doi: 10.1186/s11689-023-09512-x.
2
Moving beyond "nouns in the lab": Using naturalistic data to understand why infants' first words include uh-oh and hi.
Dev Psychol. 2023 Nov;59(11):2162-2173. doi: 10.1037/dev0001630. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
3
Semantic and Syntactic Properties of Words and the Receptive-Expressive Gap in Autistic and Non-Autistic Children.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 May 9;66(5):1771-1791. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00369. Epub 2023 May 3.
4
From Recognizing Known Words to Learning New Ones: Comparing Online Speech Processing in Typically Developing and Late-Talking 2-Year-Olds.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 May 9;66(5):1658-1677. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00580. Epub 2023 Mar 29.
5
Difference or delay? Syntax, semantics, and verb vocabulary development in typically developing and late-talking toddlers.
Lang Learn Dev. 2022;18(3):352-376. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1977645. Epub 2021 Oct 4.
6
Consistency and inconsistency in caregiver reporting of vocabulary.
Lang Learn Dev. 2022;18(1):81-96. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2021.1931233. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
8
Lexical processing of nouns and verbs at 36 months of age predicts concurrent and later vocabulary and school readiness.
J Cogn Dev. 2020;21(5):670-689. doi: 10.1080/15248372.2020.1802277. Epub 2020 Aug 26.
9
Linguistic context in verb learning: Less is sometimes more.
Lang Learn Dev. 2020;16(1):22-42. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2019.1676751. Epub 2019 Oct 21.
10
Studying the Real-Time Interpretation of Novel Noun and Verb Meanings in Young Children.
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 18;10:274. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00274. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Six-Month-Olds Comprehend Words That Refer to Parts of the Body.
Infancy. 2012 Jul;17(4):432-444. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-7078.2011.00084.x. Epub 2011 Jul 5.
3
Understanding and Assessing Word Comprehension.
Appl Psycholinguist. 2016 May;37(3):529-549. doi: 10.1017/S0142716415000107. Epub 2015 Apr 10.
4
Word learning mechanisms.
Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;8(4). doi: 10.1002/wcs.1435. Epub 2017 Feb 3.
5
Individual differences in nonlinguistic event categorization predict later motion verb comprehension.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2016 Nov;151:18-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2016.03.012. Epub 2016 Apr 29.
6
Toddlers' Verb Lexicon Diversity and Grammatical Outcomes.
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2016 Jan;47(1):44-58. doi: 10.1044/2015_LSHSS-15-0018.
7
Learning verb syntax via listening: New evidence from 22-month-olds.
Lang Learn Dev. 2015 Oct 1;11(4):356-368. doi: 10.1080/15475441.2014.978331. Epub 2014 Dec 13.
8
An Open Conversation on Using Eye-Gaze Methods in Studies of Neurodevelopmental Disorders.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2015 Dec;58(6):1719-32. doi: 10.1044/2015_JSLHR-L-14-0304.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验