Department of Communicative Sciences and Disorders, New York University, NY.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2023 May 9;66(5):1771-1791. doi: 10.1044/2023_JSLHR-22-00369. Epub 2023 May 3.
The goal of this work was to examine the semantic and syntactic properties of the vocabularies of autistic and non-autistic infants and toddlers to see if children in these two groups know different kinds of words. We focused on both receptive and expressive vocabularies. For expressive vocabulary, we looked only at the "active" lexicon: Of those words that are already in children's receptive vocabulary, we asked which ones they also produce.
We used an existing data set of 346 parent report vocabulary checklists (MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory: Words and Gestures) from 41 autistic and 27 non-autistic children at multiple timepoints between the ages of 6 and 43 months. We coded the words on the checklists for various semantic and syntactic properties and evaluated which properties predicted whether children understood and produced those words.
Overall, we replicated a common finding that autistic children have smaller receptive vocabularies than non-autistic children, but we found that of the words they understand, autistic children produce a similar proportion of those words as non-autistic children. While we found that some syntactic properties are more or less likely to be represented in children's early vocabularies (e.g., nouns are more likely to be understood and produced than words that are not nouns), these patterns did not differ across autistic and non-autistic children.
The semantic and syntactic compositions of autistic and non-autistic children's vocabularies are similar. Thus, while receptive vocabularies are relatively smaller for autistic children, they do not appear to have specific difficulty with words that have particular syntactic or semantic properties, or with adding words to the expressive vocabulary that they already understand.
本研究旨在考察自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童词汇的语义和句法属性,以了解这两组儿童是否掌握不同类型的词汇。我们关注的是接受性词汇和表达性词汇。对于表达性词汇,我们只关注“主动”词汇:在已经纳入儿童接受性词汇的词汇中,我们询问他们还能生成哪些词汇。
我们使用了现有的数据集,即 41 名自闭症儿童和 27 名非自闭症儿童在 6 至 43 个月之间的多个时间点上的 346 份家长报告词汇检查表(麦克阿瑟 - 贝茨交际发展量表:单词和手势)。我们对检查表中的单词进行了各种语义和句法属性的编码,并评估了哪些属性可以预测儿童是否理解和生成这些单词。
总的来说,我们复制了一个常见的发现,即自闭症儿童的接受性词汇量比非自闭症儿童小,但我们发现,他们理解的词汇中,自闭症儿童生成的这些词汇与非自闭症儿童生成的词汇比例相似。虽然我们发现某些句法属性在儿童早期词汇中出现的可能性更大或更小(例如,名词比非名词更有可能被理解和生成),但这些模式在自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童之间没有差异。
自闭症儿童和非自闭症儿童词汇的语义和句法构成相似。因此,尽管自闭症儿童的接受性词汇量相对较小,但他们似乎并没有在具有特定句法或语义属性的词汇上,或者在将他们已经理解的词汇添加到表达性词汇中时,存在特定的困难。