• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免疫疗法治疗癌症的持续时间:一个谜。

Treatment duration with immune-based therapies in Cancer: an enigma.

机构信息

Nitor Therapeutics, 689, Highland Lakes Cove, Birmingham, AL-35242, USA.

Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Hospital, 3801 Miranda Ave, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.

出版信息

J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Dec 5;6(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0465-0.

DOI:10.1186/s40425-018-0465-0
PMID:30518409
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6282359/
Abstract

Unlike chemotherapy treatments that target the tumor itself (rather nonspecifically), immune-based therapies attempt to harness the power of an individual patient's immune system to combat cancer. Similar to chemotherapeutic agents, the dosage and Administration section of labeling for all five currently approved PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (immunotherapy) recommends duration of treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Overactivation or constitutive activation of the immune system with immune based therapies can lead to T-cell exhaustion and activation induced cell death (AICD) in T- and B-cells. Examples of immune exhaustion and T-cell depletion is noted in preclinical and clinical studies. Overactivation or constitutive activation leading to Immune exhaustion is a real phenomenon and of profound concern as immune cells are the true arsenal for control of the tumor growth. Designing trials rigorously to address the optimum treatment duration with immune based therapies is critical. By addressing this concern now, not only we may improve patient outcomes, but also gather a deeper understanding of the role and mechanisms of the immune system in the control of tumor growth.Chemotherapy and immune-based therapies provide antitumor effects through completely different mechanisms. Chemotherapeutic agents are cytotoxic in that they directly inhibit basic cellular mechanisms, killing both malignant and nonmalignant cells (hopefully with a preference for malignant cells), while immune based therapies wake-up the host immune system to recognize malignant cells and eliminate them.While there is a burgeoning excitement surrounding development of immune based therapies for the treatment of cancer, the optimal duration for these therapies need to be explored with equal fervor. Dosing for chemotherapy has been determined over years through large-scale prospective randomized trials to pinpoint the dose which maximizes therapeutic effect while minimizing side effects. Also, due to the mechanism of chemotherapeutic action, the duration of treatment with these agents is generally until disease progression or patient intolerance. However, experience with immune based therapies is limited, with current dosing and duration guidelines based primarily on initial trials required for approval of the agents. Since immune based therapies work by activating the body's own immune system, there is concern that overactivation or constitutive activation of the immune system may lead to immune exhaustion and depletion of effector T-cells thereby causing decreased anti-tumor effects and possible allowing for tumor progression.Similar to chemotherapeutic agents, the Dosage and Administration section of labeling for all five currently approved PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors recommends duration of treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. However, since immune based therapies work with a completely different mechanism compared to chemotherapy, using the same therapy duration may not be the optimal approach.In exploring treatment duration with immune based therapies, we need to answer the following: (1) does indefinite treatment with immune based therapies exhaust the immune system counteracting its own mechanism of action leading to tumor progression and (2) how can clinical trials be designed to identify the optimal duration of immune-based therapy that prevents immune cell exhaustion but supports anti-tumor immunity.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38b/6282359/c520fec97021/40425_2018_465_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38b/6282359/c520fec97021/40425_2018_465_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d38b/6282359/c520fec97021/40425_2018_465_Fig1_HTML.jpg
摘要

与针对肿瘤本身(而非特异性)的化疗治疗不同,免疫疗法试图利用个体患者的免疫系统的力量来对抗癌症。与化疗药物类似,目前批准的五种 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂(免疫疗法)的标签中的剂量和用法部分建议持续治疗,直到疾病进展或不可接受的毒性。免疫疗法过度激活或组成性激活免疫系统会导致 T 细胞耗竭和 T 和 B 细胞的激活诱导细胞死亡(AICD)。在临床前和临床研究中已经注意到免疫耗竭和 T 细胞耗竭的例子。过度激活或组成性激活导致免疫耗竭是一个真实的现象,令人深感关切,因为免疫细胞是控制肿瘤生长的真正武器。严格设计试验以确定免疫疗法的最佳治疗持续时间至关重要。现在解决这个问题,不仅可以改善患者的预后,还可以更深入地了解免疫系统在控制肿瘤生长中的作用和机制。化疗和免疫疗法通过完全不同的机制提供抗肿瘤作用。化疗药物具有细胞毒性,因为它们直接抑制基本细胞机制,杀死恶性和非恶性细胞(希望对恶性细胞有偏好),而免疫疗法则唤醒宿主免疫系统识别恶性细胞并将其消除。尽管围绕免疫疗法治疗癌症的发展,人们越来越兴奋,但这些疗法的最佳持续时间需要同样积极地探索。化疗的剂量多年来通过大规模前瞻性随机试验确定,以确定最大限度地提高治疗效果同时最小化副作用的剂量。此外,由于化疗作用的机制,这些药物的治疗时间通常直到疾病进展或患者不耐受。然而,免疫疗法的经验有限,目前的剂量和持续时间指南主要基于批准这些药物所需的初始试验。由于免疫疗法通过激活身体自身的免疫系统起作用,因此有人担心免疫系统过度激活或组成性激活可能导致免疫耗竭和效应 T 细胞耗竭,从而导致抗肿瘤效果降低,并可能允许肿瘤进展。与化疗药物类似,目前批准的五种 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂的标签中的剂量和用法部分建议持续治疗,直到疾病进展或不可接受的毒性。然而,由于免疫疗法与化疗相比具有完全不同的机制,因此使用相同的治疗持续时间可能不是最佳方法。在探索免疫疗法的治疗持续时间时,我们需要回答以下问题:(1) 免疫疗法的无限期治疗是否会耗尽免疫系统,从而抵消其自身的作用机制,导致肿瘤进展,以及(2) 如何设计临床试验以确定最佳的免疫疗法持续时间,以防止免疫细胞耗竭,但支持抗肿瘤免疫。

相似文献

1
Treatment duration with immune-based therapies in Cancer: an enigma.免疫疗法治疗癌症的持续时间:一个谜。
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Dec 5;6(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0465-0.
2
Intratumoral immunotherapy: using the tumor as the remedy.瘤内免疫治疗:利用肿瘤作为治疗手段。
Ann Oncol. 2017 Dec 1;28(suppl_12):xii33-xii43. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx683.
3
Immuno-pharmacodynamics for evaluating mechanism of action and developing immunotherapy combinations.用于评估作用机制和开发免疫治疗组合的免疫药效学。
Semin Oncol. 2016 Aug;43(4):501-13. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2016.06.008. Epub 2016 Jun 16.
4
Advanced targeted therapies in cancer: Drug nanocarriers, the future of chemotherapy.癌症的先进靶向疗法:药物纳米载体,化疗的未来。
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015 Jun;93:52-79. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpb.2015.03.018. Epub 2015 Mar 23.
5
A radiomics approach to assess tumour-infiltrating CD8 cells and response to anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy: an imaging biomarker, retrospective multicohort study.一种基于放射组学的方法来评估肿瘤浸润 CD8 细胞与抗 PD-1 或抗 PD-L1 免疫治疗反应的关系:一项影像学生物标志物、回顾性多队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2018 Sep;19(9):1180-1191. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30413-3. Epub 2018 Aug 14.
6
Cisplatin Augments Antitumor T-Cell Responses Leading to a Potent Therapeutic Effect in Combination With PD-L1 Blockade.顺铂增强抗肿瘤T细胞反应,与程序性死亡受体-配体1(PD-L1)阻断联合使用时可产生强效治疗效果。
Anticancer Res. 2019 Apr;39(4):1749-1760. doi: 10.21873/anticanres.13281.
7
Immune checkpoint blockade therapy for cancer: An overview of FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors.癌症的免疫检查点阻断疗法:FDA 批准的免疫检查点抑制剂概述。
Int Immunopharmacol. 2018 Sep;62:29-39. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
8
Building on the anti-PD1/PD-L1 backbone: combination immunotherapy for cancer.基于抗 PD1/PD-L1 骨干:癌症的联合免疫疗法。
Expert Opin Investig Drugs. 2019 Aug;28(8):695-708. doi: 10.1080/13543784.2019.1649657. Epub 2019 Aug 6.
9
Modulation of the tumor microenvironment by intratumoral administration of IMO-2125, a novel TLR9 agonist, for cancer immunotherapy.肿瘤内注射新型 TLR9 激动剂 IMO-2125 调节肿瘤微环境用于癌症免疫治疗。
Int J Oncol. 2018 Sep;53(3):1193-1203. doi: 10.3892/ijo.2018.4456. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
10
Immune checkpoint therapy in liver cancer.肝癌的免疫检查点治疗。
J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2018 May 29;37(1):110. doi: 10.1186/s13046-018-0777-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Revisiting T-cell adhesion molecules as potential targets for cancer immunotherapy: CD226 and CD2.重新审视 T 细胞黏附分子作为癌症免疫治疗的潜在靶点:CD226 和 CD2。
Exp Mol Med. 2024 Oct;56(10):2113-2126. doi: 10.1038/s12276-024-01317-9. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
2
A non-inferiority randomized phase III trial of standard immunotherapy by checkpoint inhibitors vs. reduced dose intensity in responding patients with metastatic cancer: the MOIO protocol study.标准免疫疗法(免疫检查点抑制剂)与转移性癌症应答患者的低剂量强度比较的非劣效性随机 III 期试验:MOIO 方案研究。
BMC Cancer. 2023 May 2;23(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12885-023-10881-8.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Updates in the Clinical Development of Epacadostat and Other Indoleamine 2,3-Dioxygenase 1 Inhibitors (IDO1) for Human Cancers.依帕卡托及其他吲哚胺2,3-双加氧酶1抑制剂(IDO1)用于人类癌症临床开发的进展
Front Oncol. 2018 Oct 4;8:423. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2018.00423. eCollection 2018.
2
Durable Complete Response After Discontinuation of Pembrolizumab in Patients With Metastatic Melanoma.帕博利珠单抗停药后转移性黑色素瘤患者持久完全缓解
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jun 10;36(17):1668-1674. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.75.6270. Epub 2017 Dec 28.
3
Timing of PD-1 Blockade Is Critical to Effective Combination Immunotherapy with Anti-OX40.
Cost-effectiveness of first-line versus second-line use of domestic anti-PD-1 antibody sintilimab in Chinese patients with advanced or metastatic squamous non-small cell lung cancer.
一线与二线使用国产抗 PD-1 抗体信迪利单抗治疗中国晚期或转移性鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者的成本效果分析。
Cancer Med. 2023 Mar;12(6):7389-7397. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5440. Epub 2022 Nov 13.
4
Pan-cancer analysis of UBE2T with a focus on prognostic and immunological roles in lung adenocarcinoma.泛癌症分析 UBE2T,重点是肺腺癌中的预后和免疫作用。
Respir Res. 2022 Nov 10;23(1):306. doi: 10.1186/s12931-022-02226-z.
5
Discontinuation of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) above 18 months of treatment in real-life patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): INTEPI, a multicentric retrospective study.免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗超过 18 个月后在晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)真实世界患者中的停药:INTEPI,一项多中心回顾性研究。
Cancer Immunol Immunother. 2022 Jul;71(7):1719-1731. doi: 10.1007/s00262-021-03114-z. Epub 2021 Nov 25.
6
Discontinuation of anti-PD-1 monotherapy in advanced melanoma-Outcomes of daily clinical practice.抗 PD-1 单药治疗晚期黑色素瘤的停药-日常临床实践的结果。
Int J Cancer. 2022 Jan 15;150(2):317-326. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33800. Epub 2021 Oct 2.
7
Neuroprotective Effects of Guanosine in Ischemic Stroke-Small Steps towards Effective Therapy.神经保护作用的鸟苷在缺血性脑卒中的有效治疗的小步骤。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Jun 27;22(13):6898. doi: 10.3390/ijms22136898.
8
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Adjuvant Therapy for BRAF-Mutant Resected Stage III Melanoma in Medicare Patients.医疗保险患者 BRAF 突变型 III 期黑色素瘤辅助治疗的成本效益分析。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2021 Dec;28(13):9039-9047. doi: 10.1245/s10434-021-10288-4. Epub 2021 Jun 15.
9
T-cell agonists in cancer immunotherapy.癌症免疫疗法中的 T 细胞激动剂。
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Oct;8(2). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000966.
10
Correction to: Treatment duration with immune-based therapies in Cancer: an enigma.对《癌症中基于免疫疗法的治疗持续时间:一个谜》的更正
J Immunother Cancer. 2019 Feb 26;7(1):56. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0486-8.
PD-1 阻断时机对 OX40 抗体联合免疫治疗的效果至关重要。
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Oct 15;23(20):6165-6177. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-2677. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
4
Fas Ligand-mediated cytotoxicity of CD4+ T cells during chronic retrovirus infection.慢性逆转录病毒感染过程中 CD4+T 细胞的 Fas 配体介导的细胞毒性作用。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 10;7(1):7785. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-08578-7.
5
T-cell exhaustion in chronic hepatitis B infection: current knowledge and clinical significance.慢性乙型肝炎感染中的T细胞耗竭:当前认知与临床意义
Cell Death Dis. 2015 Mar 19;6(3):e1694. doi: 10.1038/cddis.2015.42.
6
Mechanism of activation-induced cell death of T cells and regulation of FasL expression.T细胞活化诱导细胞死亡的机制及FasL表达的调控
Crit Rev Immunol. 2014;34(4):301-14. doi: 10.1615/critrevimmunol.2014009988.
7
The new normal: immunomodulatory agents against sepsis immune suppression.新常态:抗脓毒症免疫抑制的免疫调节药物
Trends Mol Med. 2014 Apr;20(4):224-33. doi: 10.1016/j.molmed.2014.01.002. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
8
Forodesine treatment and post-transplant graft-versus-host disease in two patients with acute leukemia: facilitation of graft-versus-leukemia effect?两名急性白血病患者接受福多司坦治疗及移植后移植物抗宿主病:是否促进了移植物抗白血病效应?
Semin Oncol. 2007 Dec;34(6 Suppl 5):S35-9. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2007.11.005.
9
Purine nucleoside phosphorylase deficiency.嘌呤核苷磷酸化酶缺乏症。
Immunodefic Rev. 1991;3(1):45-81.