Nitor Therapeutics, 689, Highland Lakes Cove, Birmingham, AL-35242, USA.
Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Hospital, 3801 Miranda Ave, Palo Alto, CA, 94304, USA.
J Immunother Cancer. 2018 Dec 5;6(1):143. doi: 10.1186/s40425-018-0465-0.
Unlike chemotherapy treatments that target the tumor itself (rather nonspecifically), immune-based therapies attempt to harness the power of an individual patient's immune system to combat cancer. Similar to chemotherapeutic agents, the dosage and Administration section of labeling for all five currently approved PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (immunotherapy) recommends duration of treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Overactivation or constitutive activation of the immune system with immune based therapies can lead to T-cell exhaustion and activation induced cell death (AICD) in T- and B-cells. Examples of immune exhaustion and T-cell depletion is noted in preclinical and clinical studies. Overactivation or constitutive activation leading to Immune exhaustion is a real phenomenon and of profound concern as immune cells are the true arsenal for control of the tumor growth. Designing trials rigorously to address the optimum treatment duration with immune based therapies is critical. By addressing this concern now, not only we may improve patient outcomes, but also gather a deeper understanding of the role and mechanisms of the immune system in the control of tumor growth.Chemotherapy and immune-based therapies provide antitumor effects through completely different mechanisms. Chemotherapeutic agents are cytotoxic in that they directly inhibit basic cellular mechanisms, killing both malignant and nonmalignant cells (hopefully with a preference for malignant cells), while immune based therapies wake-up the host immune system to recognize malignant cells and eliminate them.While there is a burgeoning excitement surrounding development of immune based therapies for the treatment of cancer, the optimal duration for these therapies need to be explored with equal fervor. Dosing for chemotherapy has been determined over years through large-scale prospective randomized trials to pinpoint the dose which maximizes therapeutic effect while minimizing side effects. Also, due to the mechanism of chemotherapeutic action, the duration of treatment with these agents is generally until disease progression or patient intolerance. However, experience with immune based therapies is limited, with current dosing and duration guidelines based primarily on initial trials required for approval of the agents. Since immune based therapies work by activating the body's own immune system, there is concern that overactivation or constitutive activation of the immune system may lead to immune exhaustion and depletion of effector T-cells thereby causing decreased anti-tumor effects and possible allowing for tumor progression.Similar to chemotherapeutic agents, the Dosage and Administration section of labeling for all five currently approved PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors recommends duration of treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. However, since immune based therapies work with a completely different mechanism compared to chemotherapy, using the same therapy duration may not be the optimal approach.In exploring treatment duration with immune based therapies, we need to answer the following: (1) does indefinite treatment with immune based therapies exhaust the immune system counteracting its own mechanism of action leading to tumor progression and (2) how can clinical trials be designed to identify the optimal duration of immune-based therapy that prevents immune cell exhaustion but supports anti-tumor immunity.
与针对肿瘤本身(而非特异性)的化疗治疗不同,免疫疗法试图利用个体患者的免疫系统的力量来对抗癌症。与化疗药物类似,目前批准的五种 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂(免疫疗法)的标签中的剂量和用法部分建议持续治疗,直到疾病进展或不可接受的毒性。免疫疗法过度激活或组成性激活免疫系统会导致 T 细胞耗竭和 T 和 B 细胞的激活诱导细胞死亡(AICD)。在临床前和临床研究中已经注意到免疫耗竭和 T 细胞耗竭的例子。过度激活或组成性激活导致免疫耗竭是一个真实的现象,令人深感关切,因为免疫细胞是控制肿瘤生长的真正武器。严格设计试验以确定免疫疗法的最佳治疗持续时间至关重要。现在解决这个问题,不仅可以改善患者的预后,还可以更深入地了解免疫系统在控制肿瘤生长中的作用和机制。化疗和免疫疗法通过完全不同的机制提供抗肿瘤作用。化疗药物具有细胞毒性,因为它们直接抑制基本细胞机制,杀死恶性和非恶性细胞(希望对恶性细胞有偏好),而免疫疗法则唤醒宿主免疫系统识别恶性细胞并将其消除。尽管围绕免疫疗法治疗癌症的发展,人们越来越兴奋,但这些疗法的最佳持续时间需要同样积极地探索。化疗的剂量多年来通过大规模前瞻性随机试验确定,以确定最大限度地提高治疗效果同时最小化副作用的剂量。此外,由于化疗作用的机制,这些药物的治疗时间通常直到疾病进展或患者不耐受。然而,免疫疗法的经验有限,目前的剂量和持续时间指南主要基于批准这些药物所需的初始试验。由于免疫疗法通过激活身体自身的免疫系统起作用,因此有人担心免疫系统过度激活或组成性激活可能导致免疫耗竭和效应 T 细胞耗竭,从而导致抗肿瘤效果降低,并可能允许肿瘤进展。与化疗药物类似,目前批准的五种 PD-1/PD-L1 抑制剂的标签中的剂量和用法部分建议持续治疗,直到疾病进展或不可接受的毒性。然而,由于免疫疗法与化疗相比具有完全不同的机制,因此使用相同的治疗持续时间可能不是最佳方法。在探索免疫疗法的治疗持续时间时,我们需要回答以下问题:(1) 免疫疗法的无限期治疗是否会耗尽免疫系统,从而抵消其自身的作用机制,导致肿瘤进展,以及(2) 如何设计临床试验以确定最佳的免疫疗法持续时间,以防止免疫细胞耗竭,但支持抗肿瘤免疫。