• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同弥散性血管内凝血标准对危重症成年患者预后准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析方案。

Prognostic accuracy of different disseminated intravascular coagulation criteria in critically ill adult patients: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

机构信息

Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 4;8(12):e024878. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024878.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024878
PMID:30518591
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6286491/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) is a common and serious condition that can lead to poor outcomes in critically ill patients. To make a correct diagnosis and improve the outcome of patients with DIC, several organisations have put forward DIC scoring systems. However, which criteria is the best to use for diagnosing DIC remains a continuing controversy even though many studies have been conducted to validate the diagnostic accuracy of each DIC scoring system.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of DIC criteria for the prediction of mortality in critically ill adult patients. The primary objective is to assess the predictive values of the DIC criteria of Japanese Association for Acute Medicine, International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis, Japanese Ministry of Health and Welfare, Korean Society on Thrombosis and Hemostasis and Chinese Diagnostic Scoring System for 28-day mortality. We will search electronic bibliographic databases such as MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Two reviewers will independently screen titles and abstracts, perform full article reviews and extract study data. We will report study characteristics and assess methodological quality using the Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-II tool. If pooling is appropriate, we will compute parameter estimates using bivariate random-effects and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic models to produce summary receiver operating curves, summary operating points (pooled sensitivity and specificity) and 95% confidence regions around the summary operating points. Clinical and methodological subgroup and sensitivity analyses will be performed to explore heterogeneity.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This systematic review will help physicians diagnose DIC accurately and improve their clinical practice in critically ill settings. Approval from an ethics committee is not required. The findings will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42017079350.

摘要

简介

弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)是一种常见且严重的病症,可导致重症患者预后不良。为了做出正确的诊断并改善 DIC 患者的预后,一些组织提出了 DIC 评分系统。然而,尽管已经进行了许多研究来验证每个 DIC 评分系统的诊断准确性,但哪种标准最适合用于诊断 DIC 仍然存在争议。

方法和分析

我们将对用于预测重症成年患者死亡率的 DIC 标准的诊断准确性进行系统评价和荟萃分析。主要目的是评估日本急救医学协会、国际血栓与止血学会、日本厚生劳动省、韩国血栓与止血学会和中国 28 天死亡率诊断评分系统的 DIC 标准对死亡率的预测值。我们将检索 MEDLINE、EMBASE 和 Cochrane 对照试验中心注册库等电子文献数据库。两名审查员将独立筛选标题和摘要,进行全文审查并提取研究数据。我们将使用诊断准确性研究质量工具 II 报告研究特征和评估方法学质量。如果适合汇总,我们将使用双变量随机效应和层次汇总受试者工作特征模型计算参数估计,以生成汇总受试者工作特征曲线、汇总工作点(汇总敏感性和特异性)和汇总工作点周围的 95%置信区间。将进行临床和方法学亚组分析和敏感性分析,以探索异质性。

伦理和传播

本系统评价将有助于医生准确诊断 DIC,并改善其在重症环境中的临床实践。不需要伦理委员会的批准。研究结果将通过发表在同行评议的期刊上传播。

PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42017079350。

相似文献

1
Prognostic accuracy of different disseminated intravascular coagulation criteria in critically ill adult patients: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.不同弥散性血管内凝血标准对危重症成年患者预后准确性的系统评价和荟萃分析方案。
BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 4;8(12):e024878. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024878.
2
Head-to-head comparison of procalcitonin and presepsin for the diagnosis of sepsis in critically ill adult patients: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.降钙素原与可溶性髓系细胞触发受体-1在危重症成年患者脓毒症诊断中的头对头比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2017 Mar 6;7(3):e014305. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014305.
3
A multicenter, prospective validation of disseminated intravascular coagulation diagnostic criteria for critically ill patients: comparing current criteria.多中心前瞻性验证重症患者弥散性血管内凝血诊断标准:现行标准比较
Crit Care Med. 2006 Mar;34(3):625-31. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000202209.42491.38.
4
Evaluation of the new Chinese Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Scoring System in critically ill patients: A multicenter prospective study.评价新的中国弥散性血管内凝血评分系统在危重症患者中的应用:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 22;7(1):9057. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09190-5.
5
Evaluation of Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation Scores in Critically Ill Pediatric Patients.危重症儿科患者弥散性血管内凝血评分的评估
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2016 May;17(5):e239-46. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000000705.
6
Prospective validation of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation.国际血栓与止血学会弥散性血管内凝血评分系统的前瞻性验证
Crit Care Med. 2004 Dec;32(12):2416-21. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000147769.07699.e3.
7
Evaluation of new Japanese diagnostic criteria for disseminated intravascular coagulation in critically ill patients.危重症患者弥散性血管内凝血新日本诊断标准的评估
Clin Appl Thromb Hemost. 2005 Jan;11(1):71-6. doi: 10.1177/107602960501100108.
8
Non-overt disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring for critically ill patients: the impact of antithrombin levels.危重症患者非显性弥散性血管内凝血评分:抗凝血酶水平的影响
Thromb Haemost. 2009 Apr;101(4):696-705.
9
A multicenter, prospective evaluation of the Chinese Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Scoring System for disseminated intravascular coagulation.多中心、前瞻性评估中国血栓与止血学会弥散性血管内凝血评分系统。
Thromb Res. 2019 Jan;173:131-140. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2018.11.022. Epub 2018 Nov 23.
10
Performance Evaluation of Five Different Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) Diagnostic Criteria for Predicting Mortality in Patients with Complicated Sepsis.五种不同的弥散性血管内凝血(DIC)诊断标准对复杂脓毒症患者死亡率预测的性能评估
J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Nov;31(11):1838-1845. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.11.1838.

引用本文的文献

1
Mucormycosis during COVID-19 era: A retrospective assessment.2019冠状病毒病大流行期间的毛霉病:一项回顾性评估
Infect Med (Beijing). 2024 Apr 15;3(2):100112. doi: 10.1016/j.imj.2024.100112. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Inflammation/coagulopathy/fibrinolysis: Dynamic indicators of COVID-19 progression in patients with moderate COVID-19 in Wenzhou, China.炎症/凝血功能障碍/纤维蛋白溶解:中国温州中度 COVID-19 患者病情进展的动态指标。
Clin Immunol. 2021 Nov;232:108852. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2021.108852. Epub 2021 Sep 11.

本文引用的文献

1
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
2
Retrospective Evaluation of New Chinese Diagnostic Scoring System for Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation.弥散性血管内凝血中国新诊断评分系统的回顾性评估
PLoS One. 2015 Jun 15;10(6):e0129170. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0129170. eCollection 2015.
3
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
4
A multicenter, prospective validation study of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring system in patients with severe sepsis.日本急性医学协会弥散性血管内凝血评分系统在严重脓毒症患者中的多中心前瞻性验证研究。
Crit Care. 2013 Jun 20;17(3):R111. doi: 10.1186/cc12783.
5
QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.QUADAS-2:用于诊断准确性研究质量评估的修订工具。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.
6
Diagnosis and treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation: guidelines of the Italian Society for Haemostasis and Thrombosis (SISET).弥散性血管内凝血的诊断与治疗:意大利血栓与止血学会(SISET)指南。
Thromb Res. 2012 May;129(5):e177-84. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2011.08.028. Epub 2011 Sep 17.
7
Application of GRADE: making evidence-based recommendations about diagnostic tests in clinical practice guidelines.应用 GRADE 系统:在临床实践指南中制定基于证据的诊断测试推荐意见。
Implement Sci. 2011 Jun 10;6:62. doi: 10.1186/1748-5908-6-62.
8
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明。
Open Med. 2009;3(3):e123-30. Epub 2009 Jul 21.
9
Prospective external validation of the new scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation by Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM).日本急救医学会(JAAM)制定的弥散性血管内凝血新评分系统的前瞻性外部验证。
Thromb Res. 2010 Sep;126(3):217-21. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2010.06.004. Epub 2010 Jun 29.
10
Expert consensus for the treatment of disseminated intravascular coagulation in Japan.日本弥散性血管内凝血治疗专家共识。
Thromb Res. 2010 Jan;125(1):6-11. doi: 10.1016/j.thromres.2009.08.017. Epub 2009 Sep 25.