• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

谁是医学临床专业学生的合适教师?运用改良德尔菲法调查利益相关者的意见。

Who are the right teachers for medical clinical students? Investigating stakeholders' opinions using modified Delphi approach.

作者信息

Shaterjalali Maria, Yamani Nikoo, Changiz Tahereh

机构信息

Department of Medical Education, Medical Education Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran,

出版信息

Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018 Nov 8;9:801-809. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S176480. eCollection 2018.

DOI:10.2147/AMEP.S176480
PMID:30519136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6235154/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to realize that learning in a clinical setting, the interactions of the students with teachers, learning materials, and learning environments are essential. In clinical education, different groups may play the role of the teacher for medical students. This study was designed to determine the optimal characteristics for medical clinical teachers, their selection criteria, and their responsibilities.

METHODS

The modified Delphi technique was used in this study. Participants comprised vice-chancellors of education, deans of medical schools, and deputies of education in medical schools across Iran. This study was conducted in three rounds. In the first round, the participants were selected using purposive sampling, and the data were collected through focus group discussions and analyzed through content analysis. The data collection tool in the second and third rounds involved a questionnaire derived from the first round, and the consensus criterion to accept or reject the questionnaire items was frequency distribution.

RESULTS

The final number of statements in the first round was 157. The second-round questionnaire was designed in the four sections of teaching team, selection criteria, task description of the teaching team (including faculties, specialist staffs, residents, general practitioners, and health and treatment staff), and incentives separately for the specialist staff, residents, general practitioners, and health and treatment staff. The third-round questionnaire included feedback and items that were not agreed upon in the second round.

CONCLUSION

The results of this study indicated the necessity of forming a teaching team, paying attention to the selection criteria, and planning requirements for assigning responsibilities to the teaching team in accordance with the objectives, programs, and requirements of medical schools, along with using strategies to attract participation and create motivation in the teaching team.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是认识到在临床环境中学习时,学生与教师、学习材料及学习环境之间的互动至关重要。在临床教育中,不同群体可能会对医学生起到教师的作用。本研究旨在确定医学临床教师的最佳特质、选拔标准及其职责。

方法

本研究采用改良德尔菲技术。参与者包括伊朗各地教育副校长、医学院院长及医学院教育副院长。本研究分三轮进行。第一轮,采用目的抽样法选取参与者,通过焦点小组讨论收集数据,并通过内容分析进行分析。第二轮和第三轮的数据收集工具是基于第一轮得出的问卷,接受或拒绝问卷项目的共识标准是频率分布。

结果

第一轮的最终陈述数量为157条。第二轮问卷在教学团队、选拔标准、教学团队任务描述(包括教员、专科工作人员、住院医师、全科医生以及健康与治疗工作人员)以及分别针对专科工作人员、住院医师、全科医生以及健康与治疗工作人员的激励措施这四个部分进行设计。第三轮问卷包括反馈以及第二轮中未达成一致的项目。

结论

本研究结果表明,有必要组建教学团队,关注选拔标准,根据医学院校的目标、课程和要求规划教学团队的职责分配要求,同时运用策略吸引教学团队参与并激发其积极性。

相似文献

1
Who are the right teachers for medical clinical students? Investigating stakeholders' opinions using modified Delphi approach.谁是医学临床专业学生的合适教师?运用改良德尔菲法调查利益相关者的意见。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2018 Nov 8;9:801-809. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S176480. eCollection 2018.
2
Teaching undergraduate medical students Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP): a Delphi study on curriculum content.本科医学生儿童与青少年精神病学(CAP)教学:课程内容德尔菲研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Dec 20;18(1):315. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1427-4.
3
Multi-disciplinary supportive end of life care in long-term care: an integrative approach to improving end of life.多学科支持的长期护理临终关怀:改善临终关怀的综合方法。
BMC Geriatr. 2021 May 22;21(1):326. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02271-1.
4
Survey of faculty development in four Israeli medical schools: clinical faculty development is inadequate and clinical teaching is undervalued in Israeli faculties of medicine.四所以色列医学院教师发展情况调查:以色列医学院临床教师发展不足,临床教学不受重视。
Isr J Health Policy Res. 2021 Feb 8;10(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s13584-021-00438-0.
5
Medical Students' Professional Development as Educators Revealed Through Reflections on Their Teaching Following a Students-as-Teachers Course.通过医学生作为教师课程后的教学反思揭示医学生作为教育者的专业发展
Teach Learn Med. 2017 Oct-Dec;29(4):411-419. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2017.1302801. Epub 2017 May 12.
6
360-degree Delphi: addressing sociotechnical challenges of healthcare IT.360 度德尔菲法:应对医疗信息技术的社会技术挑战。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1071-x.
7
The challenge of planning learning opportunities for clinical medicine: a triangulation study in Iran.规划临床医学学习机会的挑战:伊朗的一项三角研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 31;19(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1719-3.
8
Identifying the challenges to good clinical rounds: A focus-group study of medical teachers.识别良好临床查房的挑战:一项针对医学教师的焦点小组研究。
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2019 Apr;7(2):62-73. doi: 10.30476/JAMP.2019.44710.
9
An evaluation of training of teachers in medical education in four medical schools of Nepal.尼泊尔四所医学院校医学教育教师培训情况评估。
Nepal Med Coll J. 2007 Sep;9(3):157-61.
10
What can we expect of clinical teachers? Establishing consensus on applicable skills, attitudes and practices.我们对临床教师有何期待?就适用的技能、态度和实践达成共识。
Med Educ. 2008 Feb;42(2):134-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2007.02986.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Exploring Occupational Therapists' Professional Identity: A Q-Method Study.探索职业治疗师的职业身份认同:一项Q方法研究。
Healthcare (Basel). 2023 Feb 20;11(4):630. doi: 10.3390/healthcare11040630.

本文引用的文献

1
Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research.在医学教育研究中使用德尔菲法和名义群体法等共识小组方法。
Med Teach. 2017 Jan;39(1):14-19. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
2
Factors shaping how clinical educators use their educational knowledge and skills in the clinical workplace: a qualitative study.影响临床教育工作者在临床工作场所运用其教育知识和技能方式的因素:一项定性研究
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Feb 18;16:68. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0590-8.
3
Is There a Consensus on Consensus Methodology? Descriptions and Recommendations for Future Consensus Research.关于共识方法是否存在共识?对未来共识研究的描述与建议。
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):663-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001092.
4
Bedside teaching: specialists versus non-specialists.床边教学:专科医生与非专科医生
Clin Teach. 2016 Apr;13(2):138-41. doi: 10.1111/tct.12373. Epub 2015 May 27.
5
Peer-assisted bedside teaching rounds.同伴辅助床边教学查房。
Clin Teach. 2015 Jun;12(3):197-202. doi: 10.1111/tct.12296.
6
"I couldn't do this with opposition from my colleagues": a qualitative study of physicians' experiences as clinical tutors.“如果得不到同事的反对”:一项关于医生作为临床导师的经验的定性研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2011 Oct 5;11:79. doi: 10.1186/1472-6920-11-79.
7
What does it mean to be a good teacher and clinical supervisor in medical education?在医学教育中,成为一名优秀的教师和临床导师意味着什么?
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2011 May;16(2):197-210. doi: 10.1007/s10459-010-9255-2. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
8
Can final year medical students significantly contribute to patient care? A pilot study about the perception of patients and clinical staff.应届医学生能否为患者护理做出重大贡献?一项关于患者和临床医护人员看法的初步研究。
Med Teach. 2010;32(7):552-7. doi: 10.3109/01421590903437170.
9
Workplace learning in general practice: supervision, patient mix and independence emerge from the black box once again.全科医学中的工作场所学习:监管、患者构成和独立性再次从黑箱中浮现。
Med Teach. 2010;32(7):e294-9. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2010.489128.
10
Using a structured clinical coaching program to improve clinical skills training and assessment, as well as teachers' and students' satisfaction.使用结构化临床辅导方案来改善临床技能培训和评估,以及教师和学生的满意度。
Med Teach. 2009 Dec;31(12):e586-95. doi: 10.3109/01421590903193588.