• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

规划临床医学学习机会的挑战:伊朗的一项三角研究。

The challenge of planning learning opportunities for clinical medicine: a triangulation study in Iran.

机构信息

Department of medical education, Medical educational research center, Isfahan University of Medical Science, Isfahan, Iran.

School of Medical Science, Islamic Azad university of Tonekabon branch, Tonekabon, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 31;19(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1719-3.

DOI:10.1186/s12909-019-1719-3
PMID:31366343
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6670133/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

An essential characteristics of clinical education is the need to learn a large number of practical and communication skills along with theoretical knowledge. It is challenging to design learning opportunities (LOs) for clinical setting. We aimed to determine optimal learning opportunities from the viewpoint of Medical curriculum planners, to determine the gap between the current condition and the optimal condition in medical schools, and to present feasible tactic for clinical learning opportunities.

METHODS

This study comprised of three sub-studies and was conducted using triangulation. The first sub-study was performed using the Modified Delphi method with a view to identifying optimal learning opportunities. Data was collected by online focus group discussion and a questionnaire. The second sub-study was conducted with the aim of comparing the current condition and the optimal condition. Data was collected from nine medical schools across Iran using a checklist, available documents, observation, and interview. The third sub-study was conducted using an expert panel comprising of seven curriculum planners of the M.D.

PROGRAM

The goal of this phase was to provide feasible tactic to improve clinical education in medical schools.

RESULTS

In the first sub-study, the participants determined all items, including student-centered learning, non-threatening learning environment, and record and management system of clinical learning opportunities as implementable learning opportunities with over 70% consensus. However, in the second sub-study, student-centered teaching methods were practiced in 33% of medical schools and the non-threatening learning environment in 67% of the schools, while the record and management system of learning opportunities was not launched in any of the schools. From the viewpoint of the expert panel members, learning opportunities adapted to clinical contents, specification of content-based learning opportunities, and continuous supervision on learners to achieve the expected learning outcomes were among clinical learning opportunities with over 70% consensus.

CONCLUSIONS

Student-centered clinical learning practices, together with virtual learning methods, can lead to clinical enhancement. Opportunities such as interactive and participatory practices should gain further consideration. Also assigning responsibility to learners and monitoring them are strategies for enhancement.

摘要

背景

临床教育的一个重要特点是需要学习大量的实践和沟通技能以及理论知识。为临床环境设计学习机会(LO)具有挑战性。我们旨在从医学课程规划者的角度确定最佳学习机会,确定医学院校现状与最佳状态之间的差距,并为临床学习机会提出可行的策略。

方法

本研究包括三项子研究,并使用三角测量法进行。第一项子研究使用改良 Delphi 法确定最佳学习机会。通过在线焦点小组讨论和问卷收集数据。第二项子研究旨在比较现状和最佳状态。使用清单、可用文件、观察和访谈从伊朗九所医学院收集数据。第三项子研究使用由七名医学博士课程规划者组成的专家小组进行。

目的

这一阶段的目标是提供可行的策略来改善医学院的临床教育。

结果

在第一项子研究中,参与者确定了所有项目,包括以学生为中心的学习、无威胁的学习环境以及临床学习机会的记录和管理系统,这些都是可实施的学习机会,达成了超过 70%的共识。然而,在第二项子研究中,以学生为中心的教学方法在 33%的医学院中实施,无威胁的学习环境在 67%的学校中实施,而学习机会的记录和管理系统在任何学校都没有启动。从专家小组成员的角度来看,适应临床内容的学习机会、指定基于内容的学习机会以及对学习者进行持续监督以实现预期学习成果的学习机会是具有超过 70%共识的临床学习机会。

结论

以学生为中心的临床学习实践,加上虚拟学习方法,可以促进临床教学的提升。应该进一步考虑互动式和参与式实践等机会。此外,赋予学习者责任并对其进行监督也是提高学习效果的策略。

相似文献

1
The challenge of planning learning opportunities for clinical medicine: a triangulation study in Iran.规划临床医学学习机会的挑战:伊朗的一项三角研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jul 31;19(1):292. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1719-3.
2
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
3
The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.基于互联网的电子学习对临床医生行为和患者结局的有效性:一项系统评价方案。
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):52-64. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1919.
4
Consensus on communication curriculum content in Danish undergraduate medical education: A Delphi study.丹麦本科医学教育中关于沟通课程内容的共识:一项德尔菲研究。
Med Teach. 2022 Nov;44(11):1221-1227. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2072280. Epub 2022 Jun 1.
5
"Men's health--a little in the shadow": a formative evaluation of medical curriculum enhancement with men's health teaching and learning.“男性健康——略显黯淡”:对通过男性健康教学加强医学课程的形成性评估
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Nov 26;15:210. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0489-9.
6
A new approach to bridging content gaps in the clinical curriculum.弥合临床课程内容差距的新方法。
Med Teach. 2007 Mar;29(2-3):e47-50. doi: 10.1080/01421590601034662.
7
How do Swiss medical schools prepare their students to become good communicators in their future professional careers: a questionnaire and interview study involving medical graduates, teachers and curriculum coordinators.瑞士的医学院校如何培养学生在未来的职业生涯中成为优秀的沟通者:一项涉及医学生、教师和课程协调员的问卷调查和访谈研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2018 Nov 29;18(1):285. doi: 10.1186/s12909-018-1376-y.
8
Peer learning in the UNSW Medicine program.新南威尔士大学医学课程中的同伴学习。
BMC Med Educ. 2015 Oct 2;15:167. doi: 10.1186/s12909-015-0450-y.
9
Development of a checklist to validate the framework of a narrative medicine program based on Gagne's instructional design model in Iran through consensus of a multidisciplinary expert panel.通过多学科专家小组达成共识,制定一份清单,以验证伊朗基于加涅教学设计模型的叙事医学项目框架。
J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2019;16:34. doi: 10.3352/jeehp.2019.16.34. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
The objectives of medical education: reflections in the accreditation looking glass.医学教育的目标:透过认证之镜的反思
Acad Med. 1997 Jul;72(7):648-56. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199707000-00020.

引用本文的文献

1
The situational analysis of teaching-learning in clinical education in Iran: a postmodern grounded theory study.伊朗临床教育教与学的情境分析:后现代扎根理论研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2022 Jul 2;22(1):520. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03577-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimal clinical setting, tutors, and learning opportunities in medical education: A content analysis.医学教育中的最佳临床环境、指导教师和学习机会:一项内容分析。
J Educ Health Promot. 2018 Oct 29;7:130. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_56_18. eCollection 2018.
2
The Use of the Delphi and Other Consensus Group Methods in Medical Education Research: A Review.德尔菲法和其他共识小组方法在医学教育研究中的应用:综述。
Acad Med. 2017 Oct;92(10):1491-1498. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001812.
3
Using consensus group methods such as Delphi and Nominal Group in medical education research.在医学教育研究中使用德尔菲法和名义群体法等共识小组方法。
Med Teach. 2017 Jan;39(1):14-19. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1245856. Epub 2016 Nov 12.
4
Competence of medical students in communicating drug therapy: Value of role-play demonstrations.医学生在药物治疗沟通方面的能力:角色扮演示范的价值。
Indian J Pharmacol. 2016 Jan-Feb;48(1):37-41. doi: 10.4103/0253-7613.174517.
5
How to use the nominal group and Delphi techniques.如何使用名词组和德尔菲技术。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2016 Jun;38(3):655-62. doi: 10.1007/s11096-016-0257-x. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
6
Is There a Consensus on Consensus Methodology? Descriptions and Recommendations for Future Consensus Research.关于共识方法是否存在共识?对未来共识研究的描述与建议。
Acad Med. 2016 May;91(5):663-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001092.
7
A Rapid Review of the Factors Affecting Healthcare Students' Satisfaction with Small-Group, Active Learning Methods.影响医学生对小组主动学习方法满意度的因素快速综述
Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(1):15-25. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1107484.
8
Undergraduate teaching in the outpatient clinic: Can we do better?门诊中的本科教学:我们能否做得更好?
Med Teach. 2012;34(8):674. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.689035. Epub 2012 May 30.
9
The role of blended learning in the clinical education of healthcare students: a systematic review.混合式学习在医疗保健学生临床教育中的作用:系统评价。
Med Teach. 2012;34(4):e216-21. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.642831.
10
Proposal for a collaborative approach to clinical teaching.临床教学合作方法提案。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2009 Apr;84(4):339-44. doi: 10.1016/S0025-6196(11)60543-0.