• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于评估治疗双胎输血综合征的研究的核心结局集。

Core outcome set for research studies evaluating treatments for twin-twin transfusion syndrome.

机构信息

Vascular Biology Research Centre, Molecular and Clinical Sciences Research Institute, St George's University of London, London, UK.

Fetal Medicine Unit, St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University of London, London, UK.

出版信息

Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;54(2):255-261. doi: 10.1002/uog.20183. Epub 2019 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1002/uog.20183
PMID:30520170
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop, using a Delphi procedure and a nominal group technique, a core outcome set (COS) for studies evaluating treatments for twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), which should assist in standardizing outcome selection, collection and reporting in future research studies.

METHODS

An international steering group comprising healthcare professionals, researchers and patients with experience of TTTS guided the development of this COS. Potential core outcomes, identified through a comprehensive literature review and supplemented by outcomes suggested by the steering group, were entered into a three-round Delphi survey. Healthcare professionals, researchers, and patients or relatives of patients who had experienced TTTS were invited to participate. Consensus was defined a priori using the 15%/70% definition of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET) initiative. The modified nominal group technique was used to evaluate the consensus outcomes in a face-to-face consultation meeting and identify the final COS.

RESULTS

One hundred and three participants, from 29 countries, participated in the three-round Delphi survey. Of those, 88 completed all three rounds. Twenty-two consensus outcomes were identified through the Delphi procedure and entered into the modified nominal group technique. The consensus meeting was attended by 11 healthcare professionals, two researchers and three patients; 12 core outcomes were prioritized for inclusion in the COS. Fetal core outcomes included live birth, pregnancy loss (including miscarriage, stillbirth, termination of pregnancy and neonatal mortality), subsequent death of a cotwin following single-twin demise at the time of treatment, recurrence of TTTS, twin anemia-polycythemia sequence and amniotic band syndrome. Neonatal core outcomes included gestational age at delivery, birth weight, brain injury syndromes and ischemic limb injury. Maternal core outcomes included maternal mortality and admission to Level-2 or -3 care setting. One aspirational outcome, neurodevelopment at 18-24 months of age, was also prioritized.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing the COS for TTTS within future research studies could make a substantial contribution to advancing the usefulness of research in TTTS. Standardized definitions and measurement instruments are now required for individual core outcomes. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

摘要

目的

采用德尔菲法和名义群体技术,为评估双胎输血综合征(TTTS)治疗方法的研究制定核心结局集(COS),以协助规范未来研究中结局的选择、采集和报告。

方法

由具有 TTTS 诊治经验的医护人员、研究人员和患者组成的国际指导小组指导了本 COS 的制定。通过全面的文献回顾确定潜在的核心结局,并由指导小组补充建议的结局,将这些结局纳入三轮德尔菲调查。邀请医护人员、研究人员以及经历 TTTS 的患者或其亲属参与调查。采用核心结局测量有效性试验(COMET)倡议中预先设定的 15%/70%定义来确定共识。采用改良的名义群体技术在面对面的咨询会议上对共识结局进行评估,并确定最终的 COS。

结果

共有来自 29 个国家的 103 名参与者参加了三轮德尔菲调查,其中 88 名完成了全部三轮调查。通过德尔菲法确定了 22 个共识结局,并将其纳入改良的名义群体技术。11 名医护人员、2 名研究人员和 3 名患者参加了共识会议,会议确定了 12 个核心结局纳入 COS。胎儿结局包括活产、妊娠丢失(包括流产、死胎、终止妊娠和新生儿死亡)、治疗时一胎死亡后另一胎的后续死亡、TTTS 复发、双胎贫血-红细胞增多序列和羊膜带综合征。新生儿结局包括分娩时的胎龄、出生体重、脑损伤综合征和缺血性肢体损伤。产妇结局包括产妇死亡率和入住 2 级或 3 级护理机构。同时还确定了一个期望结局,即 18-24 月龄时的神经发育。

结论

在未来的研究中实施 TTTS 的 COS 将对提高 TTTS 研究的实用性做出重要贡献。现在需要为各个核心结局制定标准化的定义和测量工具。版权所有 © 2018 ISUOG。由约翰威立父子出版公司出版。

相似文献

1
Core outcome set for research studies evaluating treatments for twin-twin transfusion syndrome.用于评估治疗双胎输血综合征的研究的核心结局集。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Aug;54(2):255-261. doi: 10.1002/uog.20183. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
2
Core outcome set for studies investigating management of selective fetal growth restriction in twins.针对双胎选择性胎儿生长受限管理研究的核心结局集。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 May;55(5):652-660. doi: 10.1002/uog.20388. Epub 2020 Mar 29.
3
Twin-Twin Transfusion Syndrome: study protocol for developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set.双胎输血综合征:制定、传播和实施核心结局集的研究方案
Trials. 2017 Jul 14;18(1):325. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2042-0.
4
Study protocol: developing, disseminating, and implementing a core outcome set for selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies.研究方案:制定、传播和实施单绒毛膜双胎妊娠选择性胎儿生长受限的核心结局集。
Trials. 2019 Jan 9;20(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3153-y.
5
Development of a core outcome set for epilepsy in pregnancy (E-CORE): a national multi-stakeholder modified Delphi consensus study.制定妊娠癫痫核心结局集(E-CORE):一项全国性多利益相关者改良德尔菲共识研究。
BJOG. 2017 Mar;124(4):661-667. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14430. Epub 2016 Nov 16.
6
Prediction of post-laser fetal death in selective growth restriction complicating twin-twin transfusion syndrome using standardized definitions.使用标准化定义预测双胎输血综合征合并选择性生长受限的激光治疗后胎儿死亡情况。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Nov;58(5):738-743. doi: 10.1002/uog.23519. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
7
Outcome reporting across randomized trials and observational studies evaluating treatments for twin-twin transfusion syndrome: systematic review.评价双胎输血综合征治疗方法的随机试验和观察性研究的结局报告:系统评价。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018 Nov;52(5):577-585. doi: 10.1002/uog.19068. Epub 2018 Sep 24.
8
A core outcome set for future male infertility research: development of an international consensus.未来男性不育研究的核心结局集:国际共识的形成
Hum Reprod. 2025 May 1;40(5):865-875. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaf039.
9
Outcome following laser surgery of twin-twin transfusion syndrome complicated by selective fetal growth restriction: systematic review and meta-analysis.激光手术治疗双胎输血综合征合并选择性胎儿生长受限的结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2023 Sep;62(3):320-327. doi: 10.1002/uog.26252.
10
Outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy with selective fetal growth restriction at 16, 20 or 30 weeks according to new Delphi consensus definition.根据新的德尔菲共识定义,16、20 或 30 周时选择性胎儿生长受限的单绒毛膜双胎妊娠的结局。
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2020 Dec;56(6):821-830. doi: 10.1002/uog.21975.

引用本文的文献

1
Care Levels for Fetal Therapy Centers.胎儿治疗中心的护理级别。
Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun 1;139(6):1027-1042. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000004793. Epub 2022 May 2.
2
Core Outcome Sets (COS) related to pregnancy and childbirth: a systematic review.与妊娠和分娩相关的核心结局集(COS):系统评价。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021 Oct 9;21(1):691. doi: 10.1186/s12884-021-04164-y.
3
Study protocol: a core outcome set for perinatal interventions for congenital diaphragmatic hernia.研究方案:先天性膈疝围产期干预的核心结局集
Trials. 2021 Feb 23;22(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05120-z.
4
Developing a core outcome set for future infertility research: an international consensus development study†  ‡.制定未来不孕不育研究的核心结局集:一项国际共识发展研究†‡。
Hum Reprod. 2020 Dec 1;35(12):2725-2734. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deaa241.
5
Systematic review of international Delphi surveys for core outcome set development: representation of international patients.系统评价国际德尔菲调查在核心结局集制定中的应用:国际患者的代表性。
BMJ Open. 2020 Nov 23;10(11):e040223. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040223.
6
The incidence, maternal, fetal and neonatal consequences of single intrauterine fetal death in monochorionic twins: A prospective observational UKOSS study.单绒毛膜性双胎一胎宫内死亡的发生率、母婴及新生儿结局:一项英国胎儿医学中心前瞻性观察研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 21;15(9):e0239477. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0239477. eCollection 2020.
7
Selective Fetal Growth Restriction in Dichorionic Twin Pregnancies: Diagnosis, Natural History, and Perinatal Outcome.双绒毛膜双胎妊娠中的选择性胎儿生长受限:诊断、自然病史及围产期结局
J Clin Med. 2020 May 9;9(5):1404. doi: 10.3390/jcm9051404.