Suppr超能文献

夹闭切割器在标准化早期胃癌内镜黏膜下剥离术中的疗效:倾向评分匹配分析。

Efficacy of Clutch Cutter for Standardizing Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Early Gastric Cancer: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan,

Department of Molecular Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.

出版信息

Digestion. 2019;100(3):201-209. doi: 10.1159/000495287. Epub 2018 Dec 6.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using the Clutch Cutter (CC), a scissor-type knife, compared with those of procedures using conventional devices.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study evaluated 237 patients with early gastric cancer: 83 who underwent ESD using the CC group and 154 who underwent ESD using the insulated-tip knife 2 (IT2 group). Clinicopathological features and technical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using a propensity score-matched analysis.

RESULTS

In 61 pairs of matched patients, there was no significant difference in R0 resection, perforation, or postoperative bleeding between the CC and IT2 groups. Comparisons between the 2 groups showed similar treatment outcomes for an expert endoscopist. Nevertheless, there were significant differences between the 2 groups for nonexperts in terms of self-completion (61.7 and 24.5%, respectively, p < 0.001), mean procedure times (45 and 61 min, respectively, p = 0.002), and mean numbers of intraoperative bleeding points and bleeding points requiring hemostatic forceps (3 and 0 vs. 8 and 3, respectively, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Better self-completion rates and shorter procedure times were noted for gastric ESD using the CC by nonexperts than for that using IT2, probably due to hemostatic efficacy.

摘要

背景/目的:本研究旨在评估使用夹闭式切开刀(CC)进行胃内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)的安全性和有效性,并与使用传统器械的手术进行比较。

方法

这项单中心回顾性研究评估了 237 例早期胃癌患者:83 例接受 CC 组 ESD 治疗,154 例接受绝缘头刀 2(IT2)组 ESD 治疗。使用倾向评分匹配分析比较两组的临床病理特征和技术结果。

结果

在 61 对匹配患者中,CC 组和 IT2 组在 R0 切除、穿孔或术后出血方面无显著差异。两组之间的比较表明,对于专家内镜医生来说,治疗结果相似。然而,对于非专家内镜医生,两组之间存在显著差异,表现在:自我完成率(分别为 61.7%和 24.5%,p<0.001)、平均手术时间(分别为 45 分钟和 61 分钟,p=0.002)、以及术中出血点和需要止血钳的出血点数(分别为 3 个和 0 个,8 个和 3 个,p<0.001)。

结论

非专家使用 CC 进行胃 ESD 的自我完成率更高,手术时间更短,这可能归因于其止血效果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验