Suppr超能文献

剪刀式刀具在内镜黏膜下剥离术中的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of scissor-type knife for endoscopic submucosal dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Gopakumar Harishankar, Vohra Ishaan, Sharma Neil R, Puli Srinivas R

机构信息

Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, Peoria, IL (Harishankar Gopakumar, Ishaan Vohra, Srinivas R. Puli).

Interventional Oncology & Surgical Endoscopy (IOSE) Division, GI Oncology Tumor Site Team, Parkview Cancer Institute, Fort Wayne, IN, (Neil R. Sharma), USA.

出版信息

Ann Gastroenterol. 2023 Nov-Dec;36(6):615-623. doi: 10.20524/aog.2023.0838. Epub 2023 Oct 30.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective resection technique for early cancers and large gastrointestinal luminal lesions. However, ESD is technically challenging, with the potential for severe adverse events. Scissor-type ESD (ST-ESD) knives with an inner cutting edge and an electrically insulated external coating could mitigate some of these risks. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of ST electrosurgical knives when used for ESDs.

METHODS

Electronic databases were queried for studies from January 2005 through December 2022 evaluating the performance of ST-ESD knives. Fixed- and random-effects models were used to calculate pooled proportions. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I test and by constructing funnel plots, while bias was calculated using Egger and Harbord bias indicators.

RESULTS

Final analysis included data from 17 studies comprising 1652 ESD procedures. The pooled en bloc resection rate and R0 resection rate were 97.94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.20-98.57) and 94.32% (95%CI 93.11-95.43), respectively. The main adverse events were perforation and delayed post-procedural bleeding, with pooled rates of 1.07% (95%CI 0.63-1.62) and 1.86% (95%CI 1.26-2.56), respectively. There was no heterogeneity, as indicated by an I score of 0% (95%CI 0-44.50%). The mean procedure time was 67.45 min (95%CI 58.01-76.89).

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis shows that ST-ESD knives deliver consistently good performance across various locations in the gastrointestinal lumen and lesion sizes, with a good safety profile. This could be particularly appealing to newer adopters of ESD.

摘要

背景

内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)是一种用于早期癌症和大型胃肠道腔病变的有效切除技术。然而,ESD在技术上具有挑战性,存在发生严重不良事件的可能性。具有内切割边缘和电绝缘外部涂层的剪刀型ESD(ST-ESD)刀可以减轻其中一些风险。本研究旨在评估ST电外科刀用于ESD时的性能。

方法

查询电子数据库,获取2005年1月至2022年12月期间评估ST-ESD刀性能的研究。采用固定效应模型和随机效应模型计算合并比例。使用I²检验和构建漏斗图评估异质性,使用Egger和Harbord偏倚指标计算偏倚。

结果

最终分析纳入了17项研究的数据,包括1652例ESD手术。整块切除率和R0切除率的合并值分别为97.94%(95%置信区间[CI]97.20-98.57)和94.32%(95%CI 93.11-95.43)。主要不良事件为穿孔和术后迟发性出血,合并发生率分别为1.07%(95%CI 0.63-1.62)和1.86%(95%CI 1.26-2.56)。I²评分为0%(95%CI 0-44.50%),表明不存在异质性。平均手术时间为67.45分钟(95%CI 58.01-76.89)。

结论

我们的分析表明,ST-ESD刀在胃肠道腔的各个部位和病变大小方面均表现出一致的良好性能,安全性良好。这可能对ESD的新采用者特别有吸引力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e0b2/10662071/d4de7b8a72e5/AnnGastroenterol-36-615-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验