• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种新型覆膜支架治疗颈动脉狭窄的人体首次试验:SCAFFOLD 试验 30 天结果。该支架用于高风险颈动脉内膜切除术患者

A First-in-Human Evaluation of a Novel Mesh-Covered Stent for Treatment of Carotid Stenosis in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy: 30-Day Results of the SCAFFOLD Trial.

机构信息

Division of Vascular Therapy, Hawaii Permanente Medical Group and Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Honolulu, Hawaii.

Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, University of Buffalo, Buffalo, New York.

出版信息

JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 10;11(23):2396-2404. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.040.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.040
PMID:30522669
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The primary purpose of this study was the composite of major adverse events through 30 days post-index procedure or ipsilateral stroke from 30 days to 1 year (365 days). Presented here is the composite of death, stroke, and myocardial infarction (MI) through 30 days.

BACKGROUND

Rates of minor stroke have been higher with carotid artery stenting (CAS) compared with carotid endarterectomy (CEA). The study hypothesized that a stent with mesh covering may improve plaque stabilization during CAS, reduce plaque protrusion, and lead to reduced stroke rates.

METHODS

The SCAFFOLD trial, a prospective, multicenter, single-arm clinical trial evaluating the GORE carotid stent (GCS), enrolled patients at increased risk for adverse events from CEA with severe carotid artery stenosis (defined as symptomatic ≥50% or asymptomatic ≥80%). The SCAFFOLD trial screening committee was implemented to determine adherence to the study protocol. Patients were evaluated for the primary endpoint, the composite of death, stroke, and MI through 30 days.

RESULTS

A total of 312 patients were enrolled, treated, and reviewed by the SCAFFOLD trial screening committee, of which 265 were included in the primary analysis population. The 30-day rate of death, stroke, or MI was 3.0% (95% confidence interval: 1.3% to 5.9%) and the stroke or death rate was 1.5%. The 30-day stroke rate was 1.1%. The 2 deaths in the study were not stroke related.

CONCLUSIONS

Low death, stroke, or MI rates were demonstrated with GCS in patients at high risk for CEA. The 30-day stroke rate of 1.1% suggests that the carotid stent mesh covering may reduce the neurologic events associated with CAS when used in appropriately selected patients.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目的是复合 30 天内主要不良事件或同侧卒中(30 天至 1 年)。此处介绍的是 30 天内死亡、卒中和心肌梗死(MI)的复合。

背景

与颈动脉内膜切除术(CEA)相比,颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的小卒中发生率更高。该研究假设,具有网孔覆盖的支架可能在 CAS 期间改善斑块稳定性,减少斑块突出,并降低卒中发生率。

方法

前瞻性、多中心、单臂临床试验 SCAFFOLD 试验评估了戈尔颈动脉支架(GCS),入组了因 CEA 不良事件风险增加且颈动脉狭窄严重(定义为症状性≥50%或无症状性≥80%)的患者。SCAFFOLD 试验筛选委员会的实施是为了确定对研究方案的遵守情况。对患者进行了主要终点评估,即 30 天内死亡、卒中和 MI 的复合。

结果

共有 312 例患者入组、治疗并由 SCAFFOLD 试验筛选委员会进行了审查,其中 265 例患者被纳入主要分析人群。30 天内的死亡率、卒中和 MI 发生率为 3.0%(95%置信区间:1.3%至 5.9%),卒中或死亡率为 1.5%。30 天内卒中发生率为 1.1%。研究中的 2 例死亡与卒中无关。

结论

在 CEA 高危患者中,GCS 显示出低的死亡、卒中和 MI 发生率。30 天卒中发生率为 1.1%,表明在适当选择的患者中,颈动脉支架网孔覆盖可能会降低与 CAS 相关的神经事件。

相似文献

1
A First-in-Human Evaluation of a Novel Mesh-Covered Stent for Treatment of Carotid Stenosis in Patients at High Risk for Endarterectomy: 30-Day Results of the SCAFFOLD Trial.一种新型覆膜支架治疗颈动脉狭窄的人体首次试验:SCAFFOLD 试验 30 天结果。该支架用于高风险颈动脉内膜切除术患者
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Dec 10;11(23):2396-2404. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.07.040.
2
Evaluation of a novel mesh-covered stent for treatment of carotid stenosis in patients at high risk for endarterectomy: 1-year results of the SCAFFOLD trial.评价一种新型的网覆盖支架治疗高颈动脉内膜切除术风险患者的颈动脉狭窄:支架试验的 1 年结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Jul;96(1):121-127. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28586. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
3
Anesthetic type and risk of myocardial infarction after carotid endarterectomy in the Carotid Revascularization Endarterectomy versus Stenting Trial (CREST).颈动脉血运重建内膜切除术与支架置入术试验(CREST)中颈动脉内膜切除术后的麻醉类型与心肌梗死风险
J Vasc Surg. 2016 Jul;64(1):3-8.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2016.01.047. Epub 2016 Mar 16.
4
Concomitant ipsilateral carotid endarterectomy and stenting is an effective treatment for tandem carotid artery lesions.同期同侧颈动脉内膜切除术和支架置入术是治疗串联性颈动脉病变的有效方法。
J Vasc Surg. 2020 May;71(5):1579-1586. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2019.07.054. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
5
Use of a novel embolic filter in carotid artery stenting: 30-Day results from the EMBOLDEN Clinical Study.新型栓塞滤器在颈动脉支架置入术中的应用:来自 EMBOLDEN 临床研究的 30 天结果。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2018 Nov 15;92(6):1128-1135. doi: 10.1002/ccd.27474. Epub 2018 Jan 3.
6
Transfemoral Carotid Artery Stents Should Be Used with Caution in Patients with Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.对于无症状性颈动脉狭窄患者,经股动脉颈动脉支架置入术应谨慎使用。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2019 Jan;54:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2018.10.001. Epub 2018 Oct 17.
7
Comparative Effectiveness of Carotid Artery Stenting Versus Carotid Endarterectomy Among Medicare Beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人群中颈动脉支架置入术与颈动脉内膜切除术的比较疗效
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2016 May;9(3):275-85. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002336. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
8
A prospective randomized trial comparing endarterectomy to stenting in severe asymptomatic carotid stenosis.一项比较严重无症状颈动脉狭窄患者行内膜切除术与支架置入术的前瞻性随机试验。
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2017 Dec;58(6):814-817. doi: 10.23736/S0021-9509.16.09513-6. Epub 2016 Jun 22.
9
Carotid artery revascularization in patients with contralateral carotid artery occlusion: Stent or endarterectomy?对侧颈动脉闭塞患者的颈动脉血运重建:支架置入术还是动脉内膜切除术?
J Vasc Surg. 2017 Dec;66(6):1735-1748.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.04.055. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
10
Results of carotid artery stenting with distal embolic protection with improved systems: Protected Carotid Artery Stenting in Patients at High Risk for Carotid Endarterectomy (PROTECT) trial.采用改良系统的颈动脉支架置入术治疗伴有远端栓塞保护装置的结果:高危颈动脉内膜切除术患者颈动脉支架置入术保护(PROTECT)试验。
J Vasc Surg. 2012 Apr;55(4):968-976.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2011.10.120. Epub 2012 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Thirty-day outcomes of carotid endarterectomy versus carotid artery stenting in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients: a propensity score-matched analysis.无症状和有症状患者行颈动脉内膜切除术与颈动脉支架置入术的30天结局:一项倾向评分匹配分析
EuroIntervention. 2024 Apr 1;20(7):e445-e452. doi: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00624.
2
Predictors of Occlusion after Carotid Stenting.颈动脉支架置入术后闭塞的预测因素。
Ann Vasc Surg. 2024 May;102:172-180. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2023.11.045. Epub 2024 Feb 1.
3
A Patient with Carotid Mobile Plaques Treated by Carotid Artery Stenting Using a Double-layer Micromesh Stent.
一名采用双层微网支架行经颈动脉支架置入术治疗的伴有颈动脉活动斑块的患者。
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2020;14(11):495-500. doi: 10.5797/jnet.cr.2019-0045. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
4
Clinical Outcomes of Second- versus First-Generation Carotid Stents: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.第二代与第一代颈动脉支架的临床结局:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 17;11(16):4819. doi: 10.3390/jcm11164819.
5
Clinical situations requiring radial or brachial access during carotid artery stenting.在颈动脉支架置入术中需要桡动脉或肱动脉入路的临床情况。
Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej. 2020 Dec;16(4):410-417. doi: 10.5114/aic.2020.101765. Epub 2020 Dec 29.
6
Quality Assurance for Carotid Stenting in the CREST-2 Registry.颈动脉支架置入术的质量保证:CREST-2 注册研究
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 24;74(25):3071-3079. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.10.032.