Suppr超能文献

聚二氧六环酮埋线针灸作为慢性非特异性颈部疼痛患者辅助治疗的有效性和安全性:一项随机对照试验

Effectiveness and Safety of Polydioxanone Thread-Embedding Acupuncture as an Adjunctive Therapy for Patients with Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

作者信息

Kim Eunseok, Kim Yong-Suk, Kim Young Il, Jeon Ju-Hyun, Yoo Ho-Ryong, Park Yang-Chun, Jung In Chul

机构信息

1 Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine, College of Korean Medicine, Daejeon University , Daejeon, Republic of Korea.

2 Department of Acupuncture and Moxibustion Medicine, Kyung Hee University Korean Medicine Hospital , Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

J Altern Complement Med. 2019 Apr;25(4):417-426. doi: 10.1089/acm.2018.0228. Epub 2018 Dec 5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of treatment with thread-embedding acupuncture (TEA) using polydioxanone in addition to usual care for patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNP) compared with treatment with usual care alone.

METHODS

A single-center, assessor-blinded, two-armed randomized controlled trial was performed. One hundred and six outpatients with CNP were randomly allocated into the TEA plus usual care (TU) group or the usual care (UC) group in a 1:1 ratio. TEA treatments in the neck region were provided once a week for 4 weeks, and usual care, as needed, was allowed. The primary outcome was the mean Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) score. Secondary outcomes included clinical relevance measured by using the clinically important difference (CID), pressure pain threshold (PPT), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D), and patient global impression of change (PGIC). Participants were assessed at baseline and at weeks 3, 5, and 9. Statistical analyses included analysis of covariance with baseline score as a covariate.

RESULTS

The TU group showed significant improvement in NPDS scores compared with the UC group (adjusted group difference, week 5: 13.74 [95% confidence interval: 7.57-19.90]; p < 0.0001 and week 9: 17.46 [11.15-23.76]; p < 0.0001). The proportion of patients with a decrease on the NPDS score of ≥11.5 points (minimal CID) was significantly higher in the TU group at weeks 5 and 9 than in the UC group. At weeks 5 and 9, significant differences were observed on the anxiety/depression subscale of HADS, EQ-5D, and PGIC between the two groups, but not the PPTs at three sites. Temporary stiffness was observed after TEA treatment, but no serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that polydioxanone TEA is a safe and clinically beneficial adjunctive treatment for patients with CNP.

摘要

目的

评估与单纯常规护理相比,聚对二氧环己酮埋线针灸(TEA)联合常规护理治疗慢性非特异性颈部疼痛(CNP)患者的有效性和安全性。

方法

进行了一项单中心、评估者盲法、双臂随机对照试验。106例CNP门诊患者按1:1比例随机分为TEA联合常规护理(TU)组或常规护理(UC)组。颈部区域的TEA治疗每周进行1次,共4周,并根据需要给予常规护理。主要结局是颈部疼痛和功能障碍量表(NPDS)的平均得分。次要结局包括使用临床重要差异(CID)、压痛阈值(PPT)、医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、欧洲五维健康量表(EQ-5D)和患者总体变化印象(PGIC)衡量的临床相关性。在基线以及第3、5和9周对参与者进行评估。统计分析包括以基线得分作为协变量的协方差分析。

结果

与UC组相比,TU组的NPDS得分有显著改善(调整后的组间差异,第5周:13.74[95%置信区间:7.57-19.90];p<0.0001,第9周:17.46[11.15-23.76];p<0.0001)。在第5周和第9周,TU组NPDS得分降低≥11.5分(最小CID)的患者比例显著高于UC组。在第5周和第9周,两组在HADS的焦虑/抑郁子量表、EQ-5D和PGIC上观察到显著差异,但在三个部位的PPT上没有差异。TEA治疗后观察到短暂的僵硬,但未发生严重不良事件。

结论

结果表明,聚对二氧环己酮TEA对CNP患者是一种安全且具有临床益处的辅助治疗方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验