The Department of Psychiatry, Queens University, Kingston, Ontario (Duffy); the Mood Disorders Centre of Ottawa, Ottawa (Duffy, Grof); the Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, U.K. (Goodday); and the Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto (Keown-Stoneman).
Am J Psychiatry. 2019 Sep 1;176(9):720-729. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.18040461. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
The authors sought to describe the emergent course of bipolar disorder in offspring of affected parents subgrouped by parental response to lithium prophylaxis.
Parent bipolar disorder was confirmed by the best-estimate procedure and lithium response by research protocol. High-risk offspring (N=279) and control subjects (N=87) were blindly assessed, annually on average, with the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime version or the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Lifetime version. DSM-IV diagnoses were confirmed using the best-estimate procedure in blind consensus reviews. Cumulative incidence and median age at onset were determined for lifetime syndrome- and symptom-level data. Mixed models assessed the association between parent and offspring course. A multistate model was used to estimate the clinical trajectory into bipolar disorder.
The cumulative incidence of bipolar disorder was 24.5%, and the median age at onset was 20.7 years (range, 12.4 to 30.3). The clinical course of the affected parent was associated with that of the affected child. Depressive episodes predominated during the early bipolar course, especially among offspring of lithium responders. Childhood sleep and anxiety disorders significantly predicted 1.6-fold and 1.8-fold increases in risk of mood disorder, respectively, and depressive and manic symptoms predicted 2.7-fold and 2.3-fold increases in risk, respectively. The best-fit model of emerging bipolar disorder was a progressive sequence from nonspecific childhood antecedents to adolescent depression to index manic or hypomanic episode. Subthreshold sleep symptoms were significantly associated with transition from well to non-mood disorder, and psychotic symptoms in mood episodes were significantly associated with transition from unipolar to bipolar disorder.
Bipolar disorder in individuals at familial risk typically unfolds in a progressive clinical sequence. Childhood sleep and anxiety disorders are important predictors, as are clinically significant mood symptoms and psychotic symptoms in depressive episodes.
作者试图描述受父母影响的双相障碍后代亚组中锂预防治疗反应的双相障碍的突发病程。
通过最佳估计程序和研究方案确认父母的双相障碍,通过研究方案确认锂的反应。对高风险后代(N=279)和对照组(N=87)进行盲法评估,平均每年评估一次,使用儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症谱系及终身版本的 Kiddie 时间表或情感障碍和精神分裂症终身版本的时间表。使用盲法共识审查的最佳估计程序确认 DSM-IV 诊断。对终身综合征和症状水平数据确定累积发病率和发病中位年龄。混合模型评估了父母和子女病程之间的关联。多状态模型用于估计进入双相障碍的临床轨迹。
双相障碍的累积发病率为 24.5%,发病中位年龄为 20.7 岁(范围 12.4 至 30.3)。受影响父母的临床病程与受影响子女的临床病程相关。抑郁发作在双相障碍的早期阶段占主导地位,尤其是锂反应者的后代。儿童期睡眠和焦虑障碍分别显著增加了情绪障碍的风险 1.6 倍和 1.8 倍,抑郁和躁狂症状分别增加了 2.7 倍和 2.3 倍。出现双相障碍的最佳拟合模型是一个从非特异性儿童前因到青少年抑郁到指数躁狂或轻躁狂发作的渐进序列。阈下睡眠症状与从无症状到非情绪障碍的转变显著相关,而情绪发作中的精神病症状与从单相到双相障碍的转变显著相关。
在有家族风险的个体中,双相障碍通常呈进行性临床序列发展。儿童期睡眠和焦虑障碍是重要的预测因素,临床显著的情绪症状和抑郁发作中的精神病症状也是重要的预测因素。