Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, St Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
Collaboration for Outcomes Research & Evaluation, Faculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
J Comp Eff Res. 2019 Jan;8(1):7-19. doi: 10.2217/cer-2018-0033. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
Millions of dollars are spent on the development of new personalized medicine technologies. While these research costs are often supported by public research funds, many diagnostic tests and biomarkers are not adopted by the healthcare system due to lack of evidence on their cost-effectiveness. We describe a stepwise approach to conducting cost-effectiveness analyses that are performed early in the technology's development process and can help mitigate the potential risks of investment. Decision analytic modeling can identify the key drivers of cost effectiveness and provide minimum criteria that the technology needs to meet for adoption by public and private healthcare systems. A value of information analysis can quantify the added value of conducting more research to provide further evidence for policy decisions. These steps will allow public research funders to make better decisions on their investments to maximize the health benefits and to minimize the number of suboptimal technologies.
数以百万计的资金被投入到新的个性化医疗技术的开发中。虽然这些研究成本通常由公共研究基金支持,但由于缺乏关于其成本效益的证据,许多诊断测试和生物标志物并未被医疗保健系统采用。我们描述了一种分阶段的方法来进行成本效益分析,这种分析可以在技术开发过程的早期进行,有助于降低投资的潜在风险。决策分析模型可以确定成本效益的关键驱动因素,并提供技术需要满足的最低标准,以便公共和私人医疗保健系统采用。信息价值分析可以量化开展更多研究的附加值,为政策决策提供进一步的证据。这些步骤将使公共研究资助者能够更好地做出投资决策,以最大限度地提高健康效益,减少次优技术的数量。