Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany.
Department of Urology Mannheim, Medical Faculty Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany.
Eur J Cancer. 2019 Jan;106:234-243. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.11.007. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)/European Medicines Agency (EMA) restricted first-line use of atezolizumab and pembrolizumab in patients with metastasised urothelial carcinoma by defining distinct programmed cell death ligand-1 cut-offs. We analysed the diagnostic performance of all FDA/EMA-approved programmed cell death ligand-1 assays with emphasis on new restrictions for first-line treatment with atezolizumab and pembrolizumab.
Two hundred fifty-one urothelial carcinomas were analysed on tissue microarrays with four cores of each tumour. Stains were performed in certified laboratories on Ventana Benchmark Ultra and Dako Link 48 autostainers. Stains were read on an assay-by-assay basis by two trained pathologists. Overall percentage agreement (OPA) was calculated across the preset cut-offs. Positive percentage agreement (PPA) and negative percentage agreement (NPA) were calculated across different scoring algorithms. Venn diagrams were constructed to illustrate discordance according to the recent FDA/EMA guidelines.
The Dako 28-8, 22c3 and the Ventana SP263 assays showed high interassay correlation (r-range 0.83-0.91). Interassay correlation between the Ventana SP142 and the three other assays was moderate (r-range 0.66-0.75). OPA of 93.3% was achieved between the Dako 28-8, 22c3 and Ventana SP263 assays. OPA including the SP142 was 84.1%. Pooled PPA and NPA of different scoring algorithms was 89.4% and 95.3% for the Dako 28-8, 22c3 and the SP263 assays, respectively. With the SP142 assay, pooled PPA was 59.1%. The SP142 assay identifies fewer eligible patients for first-line treatment with atezolizumab/pembrolizumab.
Dako 28-8, 22c3 and SP263 assays show interchangeable performance. The SP142 assay shows divergent staining results. Interassay variability leads to different detection rates of eligible patients for first-line treatment with atezolizumab and pembrolizumab.
最近,美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)/欧洲药品管理局(EMA)通过定义不同的程序性死亡配体-1 截止值,限制了阿特珠单抗和派姆单抗在转移性尿路上皮癌患者中的一线使用。我们分析了所有获得 FDA/EMA 批准的程序性死亡配体-1 检测的诊断性能,重点关注新的阿特珠单抗和派姆单抗一线治疗限制。
在组织微阵列上分析了 251 例尿路上皮癌,每个肿瘤有 4 个核心。在经认证的实验室中,使用 Ventana Benchmark Ultra 和 Dako Link 48 自动染色机进行染色。根据检测的不同,由两名经过培训的病理学家对染色结果进行评估。计算了预设截止值下的总阳性率(OPA)。计算了不同评分算法下的阳性阳性率(PPA)和阴性阳性率(NPA)。根据最近的 FDA/EMA 指南,构建了 Venn 图以说明不一致性。
Dako 28-8、22c3 和 Ventana SP263 检测之间具有高度的检测间相关性(r 范围 0.83-0.91)。Ventana SP142 与其他三种检测之间的检测间相关性为中度(r 范围 0.66-0.75)。Dako 28-8、22c3 和 Ventana SP263 检测之间的 OPA 达到 93.3%。包括 SP142 在内的 OPA 为 84.1%。不同评分算法的 PPA 和 NPA 的汇总值分别为 Dako 28-8、22c3 和 SP263 检测的 89.4%和 95.3%,SP142 检测的 PPA 为 59.1%。SP142 检测确定的符合一线治疗阿特珠单抗/派姆单抗条件的患者较少。
Dako 28-8、22c3 和 SP263 检测显示可互换的性能。SP142 检测显示出不同的染色结果。检测间的变异性导致符合阿特珠单抗和派姆单抗一线治疗条件的患者检测率不同。