Martin Allison, Neale Elizabeth P, Tapsell Linda C
Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
SMART Foods Centre, Faculty of Science Medicine and Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Prev Med Rep. 2018 Nov 30;13:80-84. doi: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.11.020. eCollection 2019 Mar.
The objective of this study was to assess the clinical utility of the AUSDRISK tool for determining risk of Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). In this secondary analysis from the HealthTrack study, the AUSDRISK tool was applied to data from overweight/obese volunteers completing a lifestyle intervention trial. Participants were volunteer residents of the Illawarra region recruited in 2014-2015. From 377 trial participants (BMI 25-40 kg/m, 25-54 yr), 161 provided data required for measurement of AUSDRISK, collected at 0 and 12 months. They had been randomised to one of two lifestyle interventions (±a healthy food sample, 30 g walnuts/day, I and IW) delivered by dietitians, or a control intervention (C) delivered by nurse practitioners. HbA1c measures were considered for comparison. At baseline the AUSDRISK score indicated = 83 (51.5%) were at high risk of T2DM within 5 years (≥12 points). After 12 months the proportion scored as high risk significantly decreased in the IW group (51.5% vs 33.3%; = 0.005), but not I (51.2% vs 39.0%; = 0.063) or C group (51.9% vs 38.9%; = 0.065). By comparison, HbA1c measures indicated high risk in = 24 (17%) of 139 participants at baseline and borderline non-significant changes over time in the randomised groups. In conclusion, the AUSDRISK tool has reasonable clinical utility in identifying T2DM risk in clinical samples of overweight/obese individuals.
本研究的目的是评估AUSDRISK工具在确定2型糖尿病(T2DM)风险方面的临床实用性。在这项来自HealthTrack研究的二次分析中,AUSDRISK工具被应用于完成生活方式干预试验的超重/肥胖志愿者的数据。参与者是2014 - 2015年招募的伊拉瓦拉地区的志愿者居民。在377名试验参与者(BMI 25 - 40 kg/m²,25 - 54岁)中,161人提供了测量AUSDRISK所需的数据,这些数据在0个月和12个月时收集。他们被随机分配到由营养师提供的两种生活方式干预之一(±一份健康食品样本,每天30克核桃,I组和IW组),或由执业护士提供的对照干预(C组)。考虑比较糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)测量值。在基线时,AUSDRISK评分显示83人(51.5%)在5年内患T2DM的风险较高(≥12分)。12个月后,IW组中被评为高风险的比例显著下降(51.5%对33.3%;P = 0.005),但I组(51.2%对39.0%;P = 0.063)或C组(51.9%对38.9%;P = 0.065)没有下降。相比之下,HbA1c测量值显示,在基线时,139名参与者中有24人(17%)处于高风险,随机分组后随时间变化的差异无统计学意义。总之,AUSDRISK工具在识别超重/肥胖个体临床样本中的T2DM风险方面具有合理的临床实用性。