Suppr超能文献

[关于耶和华见证人的输血与知情同意的法理学]

[The jurisprudence about blood transfusion and informed consent of Jehovah witnesses].

作者信息

Figueroa G Rodolfo

机构信息

Programa de Derecho Público, Departamento de Derecho Público, Universidad Diego Portales, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

Rev Med Chil. 2018 Jul;146(7):914-917. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872018000700914.

Abstract

The law N° 20.584 established the informed consent. This could suggest that patients have a right to refuse a blood transfusion. However, the dominant jurisprudence in protection claims filed against Jehovah Witnesses who rejected a blood transfusion, reveals that they do not have such a right. There were two exceptions in 2008, where courts acknowledged the patient's autonomy and denied the petition to authorize a blood transfusion. Most cases precede law N° 20.584. However, those cases which were upheld by the courts after the promulgation of the law, although few, follow exactly the same doctrine as before the appearance of this act.

摘要

第20.584号法律确立了知情同意原则。这可能意味着患者有权拒绝输血。然而,在针对拒绝输血的耶和华见证人的保护索赔案中,占主导地位的判例法表明,他们并不享有这种权利。2008年有两个例外情况,法院承认了患者的自主权,并驳回了授权输血的请求。大多数案例发生在第20.584号法律之前。然而,该法律颁布后法院维持原判的案例虽然很少,但遵循的原则与该法律出台之前完全相同。

相似文献

5
Perioperative Jehovah's Witnesses: a review.围手术期的耶和华见证人:一项综述。
Br J Anaesth. 2015 Nov;115(5):676-87. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev161. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
6
Patient consent and conscientious objection.患者同意与良心拒斥。
Br J Nurs. 2017 Jan 26;26(2):118-119. doi: 10.12968/bjon.2017.26.2.118.
9
ENT surgery, blood and Jehovah's Witnesses.耳鼻喉科手术、血液与耶和华见证人。
J Laryngol Otol. 2007 May;121(5):409-14. doi: 10.1017/S0022215106003744. Epub 2006 Nov 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验