• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

螺旋霉素与强力霉素在全科医疗中治疗下呼吸道感染的比较。

Comparison of spiramycin and doxycycline in the treatment of lower respiratory infections in general practice.

作者信息

Biermann C, Løken A, Riise R

机构信息

Smestad Legesenter, Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Jul;22 Suppl B:155-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/22.supplement_b.155.

DOI:10.1093/jac/22.supplement_b.155
PMID:3053569
Abstract

A total of 221 patients from 21 general practitioners was entered in a double-blind comparative study of spiramycin and doxycycline in the treatment of pneumonia and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. One-hundred-and-five patients were randomized to treatment with spiramycin tablets for 5 1/2 days and 116 patients were randomized to treatment with doxycycline tablets for nine days. The efficacy and side effects of the two treatment regimens were observed. Of the 221 patients included, 191 were acceptable for evaluation, 91 in the spiramycin group and 100 in the doxycycline group. Three patients in the spiramycin group withdrew because of lack of efficacy and one patient in the doxycycline group withdrew because of side effects (feeling unwell and blurred vision). No significant differences in efficacy or safety were found between the two treatments.

摘要

来自21位全科医生的221名患者参与了一项螺旋霉素和强力霉素治疗肺炎及慢性支气管炎急性加重期的双盲对照研究。105名患者被随机分配接受螺旋霉素片治疗5.5天,116名患者被随机分配接受强力霉素片治疗9天。观察了两种治疗方案的疗效和副作用。在纳入的221名患者中,191名可接受评估,螺旋霉素组91名,强力霉素组100名。螺旋霉素组有3名患者因疗效不佳退出,强力霉素组有1名患者因副作用(感觉不适和视力模糊)退出。两种治疗在疗效或安全性上未发现显著差异。

相似文献

1
Comparison of spiramycin and doxycycline in the treatment of lower respiratory infections in general practice.螺旋霉素与强力霉素在全科医疗中治疗下呼吸道感染的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Jul;22 Suppl B:155-8. doi: 10.1093/jac/22.supplement_b.155.
2
A double-blind comparison of spiramycin and doxycycline in treatment of respiratory tract infections (pneumonia and suppurative bronchitis).螺旋霉素与强力霉素治疗呼吸道感染(肺炎和化脓性支气管炎)的双盲对照研究
Chemioterapia. 1987 Jun;6(2 Suppl):453-5.
3
Comparison of spiramycin with erythromycin for lower respiratory tract infections.螺旋霉素与红霉素治疗下呼吸道感染的比较。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Jul;22 Suppl B:159-63. doi: 10.1093/jac/22.supplement_b.159.
4
[Multicenter study of the clinical efficacy and tolerance of roxithromicin compared to doxycycline in lower respiratory infections].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1988 May;36(5):548-51.
5
Comparison of spiramycin and doxycycline in the empirical treatment of acute sinusitis: preliminary results.螺旋霉素与强力霉素在急性鼻窦炎经验性治疗中的比较:初步结果
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1988 Jul;22 Suppl B:165-70. doi: 10.1093/jac/22.supplement_b.165.
6
Roxithromycin versus doxycycline in the treatment of acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis.罗红霉素与强力霉素治疗慢性支气管炎急性加重期的对比研究
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1992 May-Jun;15(4 Suppl):123S-127S. doi: 10.1016/0732-8893(92)90139-k.
7
Comparison of spiramycin and clarithromycin for community-acquired lower respiratory tract infections.螺旋霉素与克拉霉素治疗社区获得性下呼吸道感染的比较。
Int J Clin Pract. 1999 Sep;53(6):433-6.
8
An open randomised comparison of ofloxacin and doxycycline in lower respiratory tract infections.
Drugs. 1987;34 Suppl 1:71-3. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198700341-00015.
9
Treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis. Doxycycline and spiramycin with and without irrigation.急性上颌窦炎的治疗。强力霉素和螺旋霉素,有无冲洗治疗。
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1973 Mar-Apr;82(2):186-91. doi: 10.1177/000348947308200216.
10
Roxithromycin in skin and soft tissue infections.罗红霉素用于皮肤及软组织感染
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1987 Nov;20 Suppl B:153-6. doi: 10.1093/jac/20.suppl_b.153.

引用本文的文献

1
Doxycycline for Pneumonia: Expanding Treatment Horizons Through a Case Series and Narrative Review.多西环素治疗肺炎:通过病例系列和叙述性综述拓展治疗视野
J Pharm Technol. 2025 Aug 31:87551225251366324. doi: 10.1177/87551225251366324.
2
Use of Oral Tetracyclines in the Treatment of Adult Patients with Community-Acquired Bacterial Pneumonia: A Literature Review on the Often-Overlooked Antibiotic Class.口服四环素类药物在成年社区获得性细菌性肺炎患者治疗中的应用:对这一常被忽视的抗生素类别的文献综述
Antibiotics (Basel). 2020 Dec 14;9(12):905. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics9120905.
3
Antibiotics for community-acquired pneumonia in adult outpatients.
用于成人门诊社区获得性肺炎的抗生素
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Oct 9;2014(10):CD002109. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002109.pub4.
4
Penicillins vs trimethoprim-based regimens for acute bacterial exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.青霉素与基于甲氧苄啶的方案治疗慢性支气管炎急性细菌感染:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
Can Fam Physician. 2009 Jan;55(1):60-7.
5
Flurithromycin ethylsuccinate in the treatment of lower respiratory tract bacterial infections.琥乙红霉素治疗下呼吸道细菌感染
Infection. 1994 May-Jun;22(3):226-30. doi: 10.1007/BF01716716.