School of Nursing and Midwifery & Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Faculty of Health Sciences & Medicine, Bond University, Robina, Qld, Australia.
J Adv Nurs. 2019 Aug;75(8):1608-1620. doi: 10.1111/jan.13929. Epub 2019 Jan 15.
To assess the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on pain in older adults living with dementia.
A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Scopus, ProQuest, EBSCO (CINAHL and MEDLINE), PubMed, OVID (PsycINFO), Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from their inception up to 2 May 2018.
Risk of bias assessment and meta-analysis were conducted according to the Cochrane methods using RevMan 5.3 and findings were generated using the GRADE profiler software.
Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, but the quality of the current evidence was low to moderate. Results showed that psychosocial interventions significantly reduced the observational pain score and pain medication. Subgroup analyses indicated that sensory stimulation and individual interventions showed a reduction in observational pain in people with dementia.
Findings suggest that psychosocial interventions may be potentially effective alternatives for pain management in people with dementia. However, caution is needed in interpreting these results due to limited studies, risk of bias and heterogeneity across studies. Furthermore, well-designed research is needed on psychosocial interventions to strengthen quality of pain management in people with dementia.
This review synthesized current evidence using psychosocial interventions to manage pain in people with dementia. Findings suggest that psychosocial interventions may lead to a potential reduction in pain and pain medication in people with dementia. Healthcare providers may wish to integrate psychosocial interventions as part of the multimodal approach to the management of pain in people living with dementia.
评估心理社会干预对老年痴呆症患者疼痛的有效性。
系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
从建库起至 2018 年 5 月 2 日,在 Scopus、ProQuest、EBSCO(CINAHL 和 MEDLINE)、PubMed、OVID(PsycINFO)、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Library 进行检索。
根据 Cochrane 方法进行偏倚风险评估和荟萃分析,使用 RevMan 5.3 生成结果,并使用 GRADE 分析软件生成发现。
8 项研究符合纳入标准,但当前证据的质量为低至中度。结果表明,心理社会干预可显著降低观察性疼痛评分和疼痛药物使用。亚组分析表明,感觉刺激和个体干预可降低痴呆患者的观察性疼痛。
研究结果表明,心理社会干预可能是痴呆症患者疼痛管理的潜在有效替代方法。然而,由于研究数量有限、存在偏倚风险和研究之间存在异质性,在解释这些结果时需谨慎。此外,需要进行精心设计的心理社会干预研究,以提高痴呆患者的疼痛管理质量。
本综述综合了目前使用心理社会干预治疗痴呆症患者疼痛的证据。结果表明,心理社会干预可能会导致痴呆症患者疼痛和疼痛药物使用潜在减少。医疗保健提供者可能希望将心理社会干预整合到多模式疼痛管理方法中,以治疗患有痴呆症的患者。