Suppr超能文献

干预措施改善痴呆症患者疼痛评估和管理效果的系统评价和荟萃分析。

The effectiveness of interventions to improve pain assessment and management in people living with dementia: A systematic review and meta-analyses.

机构信息

School of Nursing & Midwifery, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2021 Mar;77(3):1127-1140. doi: 10.1111/jan.14660. Epub 2020 Nov 22.

Abstract

AIMS

To synthesize and evaluate the effectiveness of interventions for nurses to improve the assessment and management of pain in people living with dementia.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials.

DATA SOURCES

CINAHL, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) EBP, Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Scopus databases were searched for all journal articles published between 2009 -2019.

REVIEW METHODS

Papers were included under population intervention comparator outcome (PICO) framework for: (a) people living with dementia aged 65 years and over; (b) interventions developed for nurses or other health professionals; (c) comparison group of standard care or control; and (d) outcome that measures the intervention effects on nurses and people living with dementia. Independent reviewers undertook critical appraisal, data abstraction, and synthesis. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the effectiveness of interventions.

RESULTS

Of 2099 titles and abstracts screened, six interventions with low-to-moderate risk of bias met inclusion criteria. Studies that implemented a routine pain assessment tool showed no effect on nurses' analgesic management. Studies that developed a comprehensive pain model involving multidisciplinary health professionals showed overall effects on pain assessment and management in dementia care. Physician involvement had an impact on analgesic management.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive pain models improve nurses' pain assessment and management. A lack of balance between analgesia use and non-pharmacological pain management in dementia care is evident. Multidisciplinary health professionals' involvement is essential for effective intervention design for pain management in dementia.

IMPACT

Various pain assessment tools have been considered to assist identification and management of pain in people living with dementia. Nevertheless, challenges exist when caring for people living with dementia in pain. These findings support the development of a comprehensive pain model, which may be a more effective strategy than routine use of a pain tool alone for nurses to improve pain management in dementia care.

摘要

目的

综合评估并比较干预措施对改善痴呆患者护理人员疼痛评估和管理的效果。

设计

系统评价和随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

资料来源

2009 年至 2019 年间,CINAHL、乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)循证护理、考科兰图书馆、PubMed 和 Scopus 数据库对所有发表的期刊文章进行了检索。

审查方法

根据人群-干预-比较-结局(PICO)框架纳入以下文献:(a)年龄在 65 岁及以上的痴呆患者;(b)为护士或其他卫生专业人员制定的干预措施;(c)标准护理或对照组;(d)衡量干预对护士和痴呆患者影响的结局。独立审查员进行了批判性评估、数据提取和综合分析。荟萃分析用于确定干预措施的有效性。

结果

在 2099 篇标题和摘要中,有 6 项干预措施具有低到中度偏倚风险,符合纳入标准。实施常规疼痛评估工具的研究对护士的镇痛管理没有效果。制定涉及多学科卫生专业人员的综合疼痛模型的研究总体上对痴呆护理中的疼痛评估和管理有影响。医生的参与对镇痛管理有影响。

结论

综合疼痛模型可改善护士对疼痛的评估和管理。在痴呆护理中,阿片类药物使用和非药物性疼痛管理之间的不平衡显而易见。多学科卫生专业人员的参与对于设计有效的痴呆疼痛管理干预措施至关重要。

影响

已经考虑了各种疼痛评估工具来协助识别和管理痴呆患者的疼痛。然而,在疼痛的痴呆患者护理方面仍然存在挑战。这些研究结果支持制定综合疼痛模型,这可能是一种比常规使用疼痛工具更有效的策略,可帮助护士改善痴呆护理中的疼痛管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验