Chu Chia-Huei, Chiou Shiau-Ru, Wang Mao-Che, Shiao An-Suey, Tu Tzong-Yang, Lin Liang-Yu, Huang Chii-Yuan, Liao Wen-Huei
Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan,
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, National Yang-Ming University School of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan,
Audiol Neurootol. 2018;23(5):277-284. doi: 10.1159/000494966. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
The purpose of this retrospective study was to investigate the difference in treatment outcomes for patients with idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) undergoing concurrent or sequential intravenous (IV) and intratympanic (IT) steroid therapies.
Patients with idiopathic SSNHL admitted to Taipei Veterans Hospital from August 2011 to August 2012 were enrolled. Patients were treated with both IV dexamethasone 5 mg b.i.d. for 5 days, then tapered over 6 days, and IT injections of dexamethasone 5 mg daily. The administration of IV and IT steroids was given either concurrently or sequentially (IV steroid was administered from days 1-5 followed by IT steroid treatment starting on day 4 or day 5). The hearing outcomes of the concurrent and sequential groups were analyzed.
Overall, after ≥2 months following treatment, across frequencies ranging from 250 to 8,000 Hz and pure-tone average (PTA) assessments, hearing improvements were similar between treatment groups, except at the frequencies of 4,000 and 8,000 Hz where the concurrent treatment group had greater hearing gain than the sequential group (4,000 Hz: 30.68 ± 28.96 vs. 14.52 ± 24.06 dB, respectively, p = 0.042; 8,000 Hz: 22.62 ± 23.59 vs. 7.67 ± 21 dB, p = 0.030). Across frequencies and PTA assessments, a similar percentage of patients had ≥20-dB gains in hearing compared with patients treated sequentially, except at 8,000 Hz where a greater percentage of patients in the concurrent group (57.1%) than the sequential group (23.3%) (p = 0.014) had ≥20-dB hearing gains.
The findings suggest that both concurrent and sequential treatment improve hearing in patients with idiopathic SSNHL, and that concurrent treatment may show greater benefit than sequential therapy, particularly at high frequencies.
本回顾性研究旨在调查特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失(SSNHL)患者接受静脉(IV)和鼓室内(IT)类固醇联合或序贯治疗的疗效差异。
纳入2011年8月至2012年8月入住台北荣民总医院的特发性SSNHL患者。患者接受静脉注射地塞米松5mg,每日2次,共5天,然后在6天内逐渐减量,同时鼓室内注射地塞米松5mg,每日1次。静脉和鼓室内类固醇的给药方式为联合或序贯(静脉类固醇在第1 - 5天给药,随后在第4天或第5天开始鼓室内类固醇治疗)。分析联合组和序贯组的听力结果。
总体而言,治疗后≥2个月,在250至8000Hz的频率范围内及纯音平均(PTA)评估中,各治疗组的听力改善情况相似,但在4000Hz和8000Hz频率处,联合治疗组的听力增益大于序贯组(4000Hz:分别为30.68±28.96dB和14.52±24.06dB,p = 0.042;8000Hz:22.62±23.59dB和7.67±21dB,p = 0.030)。在各频率和PTA评估中,与序贯治疗的患者相比,有相似比例的患者听力增益≥20dB,但在8000Hz处,联合组中听力增益≥20dB的患者比例(57.1%)高于序贯组(23.3%)(p = 0.014)。
研究结果表明,联合和序贯治疗均可改善特发性SSNHL患者的听力,且联合治疗可能比序贯治疗更具优势,尤其是在高频段。