Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, "S. Maria della Scaletta" Hospital, Via Montericco n. 4, 40026, Imola, BO, Italy.
Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, "S. Giovanni di Dio" Hospital, Agrigento, Italy.
J Nephrol. 2019 Aug;32(4):527-538. doi: 10.1007/s40620-018-00567-x. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
The use of renal resistive indices (RRIs) for the study of renal microcirculation has in the past been proposed for the identification of renal organ damage or even to specifically identify injury to some areas of the renal parenchyma. Nevertheless, according to the most recent evidences from literature this organ-based conception of RRIs has been proven to be partial and unable to explain the RRIs variations in clinical settings of sepsis or combined organ failure of primitively extrarenal origin or, more generally, the deep connection between RRIs and hemodynamic factors such as compliance and pulsatility of the large vessels. The aim of this review is to explain the physiopathological basis of RRIs determination and the most common interpretative errors in their analysis. Moreover, through a comprehensive vision of these Doppler indices, the traditional and emerging clinical application fields for RRIs are discussed.
过去,人们曾提议使用肾阻力指数(RRIs)来研究肾微循环,以识别肾器官损伤,甚至专门识别肾实质某些区域的损伤。然而,根据文献中的最新证据,这种基于器官的 RRIs 概念被证明是片面的,无法解释 RRIs 在败血症或原发性肾外器官衰竭的临床情况下的变化,或者更普遍地说,无法解释 RRIs 与顺应性和大血管搏动性等血流动力学因素之间的深层联系。本综述的目的是解释 RRIs 测定的生理病理学基础以及在分析 RRIs 时最常见的解释性错误。此外,通过对这些多普勒指数的全面观察,讨论了 RRIs 的传统和新兴临床应用领域。