Suppr超能文献

右心室大小和应变在左心室辅助装置植入后右心衰竭风险评估中的增量价值。

The Incremental Value of Right Ventricular Size and Strain in the Risk Assessment of Right Heart Failure Post - Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation.

机构信息

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Palo Alto, California; Division of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Rennes, Rennes, France.

Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Cardiovascular Institute, Palo Alto, California; Research and Innovation Unit, INSERM U999, DHU Torino, Paris Sud University, Marie Lannelongue Hospital, Le Plessis Robinson, France.

出版信息

J Card Fail. 2018 Dec;24(12):823-832. doi: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2018.10.012. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Right heart failure (RHF) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Existing risk scores include semiquantitative evaluation of right ventricular (RV) dysfunction. This study aimed to determine whether quantitative evaluation of both RV size and function improve risk stratification for RHF after LVAD implantation beyond validated scores.

METHODS AND RESULTS

From 2009 to 2015, 158 patients who underwent implantation of continuous-flow devices who had complete echocardiographic and hemodynamic data were included. Quantitative RV parameters included RV end-diastolic (RVEDAI) and end-systolic area index, RV free-wall longitudinal strain (RVLS), fractional area change, tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion, and right atrial area and pressure. Independent correlates of early RHF (<30 days) were determined with the use of logistic regression analysis. Mean age was 56 ± 13 years, with 79% male; 49% had INTERMACS profiles ≤2. RHF occurred in 60 patients (38%), with 20 (13%) requiring right ventricular assist device. On multivariate analysis, INTERMACS profiles (adjusted odds ratio 2.38 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.47-3.85]), RVEDAI (1.61 [1.08-2.32]), and RVLS (2.72 [1.65-4.51]) were independent correlates of RHF (all P < .05). Both RVLS and RVEDAI were incremental to validated risk scores (including the EUROMACS score) for early RHF after LVAD (all P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

RV end-diastolic and strain are complementary prognostic markers of RHF after LVAD implantation.

摘要

背景

左心室辅助装置(LVAD)植入后右心衰竭(RHF)与高发病率和死亡率相关。现有的风险评分包括对右心室(RV)功能的半定量评估。本研究旨在确定 RV 大小和功能的定量评估是否可以改善 LVAD 植入后 RHF 的风险分层,超越已验证的评分。

方法和结果

2009 年至 2015 年,共纳入 158 例接受连续血流装置植入术且具有完整超声心动图和血流动力学数据的患者。RV 定量参数包括 RV 舒张末期(RVEDAI)和收缩末期面积指数、RV 游离壁纵向应变(RVLS)、分数面积变化、三尖瓣环平面收缩期位移以及右心房面积和压力。使用逻辑回归分析确定早期 RHF(<30 天)的独立相关因素。平均年龄为 56±13 岁,男性占 79%;49%的患者 INTERMACS 评分≤2。60 例(38%)患者发生 RHF,其中 20 例(13%)需要右心室辅助装置。多变量分析显示,INTERMACS 评分(调整后的优势比 2.38[95%置信区间[CI]1.47-3.85])、RVEDAI(1.61[1.08-2.32])和 RVLS(2.72[1.65-4.51])是 RHF 的独立相关因素(均 P<0.05)。RVLS 和 RVEDAI 均对 LVAD 后早期 RHF 的验证风险评分(包括 EUROMACS 评分)具有增量作用(均 P<0.01)。

结论

RV 舒张末期和应变是 LVAD 植入后 RHF 的互补预后标志物。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验