Incremental Value of Right Ventricular Outflow Tract Diameter in Risk Assessment of Chronic Heart Failure Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: Development of RVOTD-ICD Benefit Score in Real-World Setting.

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remains the basic reference for the prevention of sudden cardiac death (SCD) patients, while right ventricular (RV) abnormalities have now been associated with SCD risk. A modified benefit assessment tool incorporating RV function parameters in consideration of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) insertion should be taken into account.

METHODS

We enrolled 954 chronic heart failure (CHF) patients (age 58.8 13.1 years; 79.0% male) with quantitative measurements of right ventricular outflow tract diameter (RVOTD) before ICD implantation and then divided them according to the median level of RVOTD. The predictive value of RVOTD in life-threatening ventricular tachycardia (VT)/ventricular fibrillation (VF) vs. non-arrhythmic mortality (defined as death without prior sustained VT/VF), was evaluated respectively. Based on RVOTD and other identified risk factors, a simple risk assessment tool, RVOTD-ICD benefit score, was developed.

RESULTS

A higher RVOTD level was significantly associated with an increased risk of VT/VF (per 1 standard deviation (SD) increase, hazard ratio [HR], 1.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.11-1.33; = 0.002) but not non-arrhythmic mortality (per 1 SD increase, hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.66-1.33; = 0.709) after multivariable adjustment. Three benefit groups were created based on RVOTD-ICD benefit score, which was calculated from VT/VF score (younger age, higher RVOTD, diuretic use, prior non-sustainable VT, prior sustainable VT/VF) and non-arrhythmic mortality scores (older age, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors use, diabetes, higher left ventricular end-diastolic diameter, New York Heart Association III/IV, higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels). In the highest RVOTD-ICD benefit group, the 3-year risk of VT/VF was nearly 8-fold higher than the corresponding risk of non-arrhythmic mortality (39.2% vs. 4.8%, 0.001). On the contrary, the 3-year risk of VT/VF was similar to the risk of non-arrhythmic mortality (21.9% vs. 21.3%, = 0.405) in the lowest benefit group. RVOTD-ICD benefit score system yielded improvement in discrimination for VT/VF, non-arrhythmic mortality, and all-cause mortality than Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial (MADIT)-ICD benefit score in this cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher RVOTD was associated with significantly increased risk of sustained VT/VF in CHF patients. A simple risk assessment tool incorporating RVOTD (RVOTD-ICD benefit score) could be generalized to ICD populations, and optimize the decision-making process of ICD implantation.