水氟化：对澳大利亚和新西兰批评者的回应。

Water fluoridation: a response to critics in Australia and New Zealand.

作者信息

Burt B A, Beltran E D

机构信息

Program in Dental Public Health, School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109-2029.

出版信息

J Public Health Dent. 1988 Fall;48(4):214-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.1988.tb03201.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1752-7325.1988.tb03201.x

PMID:3054079

Abstract

Recent questions about the effectiveness of water fluoridation have come from Diesendorf in Australia and Colquhoun in New Zealand. This report examines the arguments of both authors in detail and finds errors in each. Diesendorf employed an outdated view of how fluoride exerts its anticariogenic action and took a number of quotations out of context. Colquhoun's data are questionable. Neither author has produced evidence to challenge the established safety and effectiveness of water fluoridation.

摘要

最近有关水氟化作用有效性的问题来自澳大利亚的迪森多夫和新西兰的科尔昆。本报告详细审视了两位作者的论点，并发现了他们各自的错误。迪森多夫对氟化物发挥防龋作用的方式持有过时观点，并且断章取义地引用了一些话。科尔昆的数据也存在疑问。两位作者均未拿出证据来质疑水氟化作用既定的安全性和有效性。