1 Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas , Piracicaba , Brazil.
2 Orofacial Pathologies, Imaging and Biotherapies Lab and Dental Medicine Department, Bretonneau Hospital, HUPNVS, AP-HP, Paris Descartes University - Sorbonne Paris Cité , Paris , France.
Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019 Mar;48(3):20180290. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20180290. Epub 2019 Jan 28.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of metal artefact reduction (MAR) in cone beam CT (CBCT) artefacts arising from metallic objects in the exomass. A radiographic phantom composed of 16 polypropylene tubes filled with a homogeneous radiopaque solution was created. CBCT scans were obtained with two units: Picasso Trio (Vatech, South Korea) and ProMax (Planmeca, Finland). The phantom was centred in a 5 × 5 cm field-of-view (FOV) with titanium and CoCr inserts in the exomass. All scans were repeated after enabling MAR. Mean voxel values were obtained from the 16 tubes and standard deviation was calculated as a way of measuring voxel value variability. Mean values and voxel value variability were compared individually in the presence and absence of MAR by means of analysis of variance, followed by Tukey's test (α = 0.05). In the Picasso Trio, MAR significantly decreased mean voxel values (p ≤ 0.05) and increased voxel value variability (p > 0.05) in the presence of titanium. When CoCr was present, no statistical difference (p > 0.05) was observed. In the ProMax, MAR increased significantly mean voxel values (p ≤ 0.05) in the presence of titanium, and presented no significant difference (p > 0.05) for CoCr. Voxel value variability did not differ significantly (p > 0.05) for both materials. In conclusion, MAR was not effective to correct CBCT artefacts arising from metallic objects in the exomass in the two CBCT units used.
本研究旨在评估金属伪影降低(MAR)技术在体模外金属物体引起的锥形束 CT(CBCT)伪影中的有效性。创建了一个由 16 个充满均匀不透射线溶液的聚丙烯管组成的射线照相体模。使用两个单位(韩国 Vatech 的 Picasso Trio 和芬兰 Planmeca 的 ProMax)获取 CBCT 扫描。将体模置于 5×5cm 视场(FOV)中心,在体模外有钛和 CoCr 插入物。所有扫描均在启用 MAR 后重复。从 16 个管中获得平均体素值,并计算标准偏差作为测量体素值变异性的方法。通过方差分析,然后是 Tukey 检验(α=0.05),分别在存在和不存在 MAR 的情况下比较平均体素值和体素值变异性。在 Picasso Trio 中,MAR 显著降低了钛存在时的平均体素值(p≤0.05)并增加了体素值变异性(p>0.05)。当 CoCr 存在时,未观察到统计学差异(p>0.05)。在 ProMax 中,MAR 显著增加了钛存在时的平均体素值(p≤0.05),而对于 CoCr 则没有显著差异(p>0.05)。对于两种材料,体素值变异性没有显著差异(p>0.05)。总之,在使用的两种 CBCT 装置中,MAR 不能有效纠正体模外金属物体引起的 CBCT 伪影。