Oliveira Matheus L, Dagassan-Berndt Dorothea, Sampaio-Oliveira Matheus, Simonek Michelle, Kühl Sebastian, Bornstein Michael M
Department of Oral Diagnosis, Division of Oral Radiology, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil.
Department of Oral Health & Medicine, University Center for Dental Medicine Basel UZB, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Clin Oral Implants Res. 2025 Apr;36(4):449-459. doi: 10.1111/clr.14394. Epub 2024 Dec 20.
To evaluate the influence of different dental implant materials within the exomass on the image quality in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).
Five pig jaws were scanned using four CBCT devices, first without any dental implants, followed by scans with three dental implants of the same material-pure titanium, titanium-zirconium alloy, and zirconium dioxide. Two fields of view (FOVs) were used for each device to position the implants in the exomass of a small FOV and within a large FOV. Voxel values were obtained from tubes containing a radiopaque solution to calculate mean voxel value (MVV), voxel value inhomogeneity (VVI), and image noise (IN), which were compared across implant materials and FOVs using repeated measures analysis of variance (α = 0.05). Three observers independently scored image quality using a 5-point scale.
In general, MVV remained unaffected, except for a significant increase in the X800 device when titanium or titanium-zirconium alloy implants were in the exomass of a small FOV (p ≤ 0.05). A trend of increased VVI was observed when implants were in the exomass of a small FOV, with a greater effect for zirconium dioxide, followed by titanium-zirconium alloy and titanium. IN was higher when implants were in the exomass, especially for zirconium dioxide implants (p ≤ 0.05). Image quality perception was consistent overall, though zirconium dioxide implants in both FOVs resulted in diminished quality.
The presence of implants in the exomass can negatively affect CBCT image quality, with zirconium dioxide having the greatest impact.
评估口腔颌面部不同牙科种植材料对锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像质量的影响。
使用四台CBCT设备对五副猪颌骨进行扫描,首先不植入任何牙科种植体,然后植入三种相同材料的牙科种植体——纯钛、钛锆合金和二氧化锆后进行扫描。对每台设备使用两个视野(FOV),将种植体分别置于小视野的口腔颌面部和大视野内。从装有不透射线溶液的管中获取体素值,以计算平均体素值(MVV)、体素值不均匀性(VVI)和图像噪声(IN),使用重复测量方差分析(α = 0.05)对不同种植材料和视野进行比较。三名观察者使用5分制独立对图像质量进行评分。
总体而言,MVV不受影响,但当钛或钛锆合金种植体位于小视野的口腔颌面部时,X800设备的MVV显著增加(p≤0.05)。当种植体位于小视野的口腔颌面部时,观察到VVI有增加趋势,二氧化锆的影响更大,其次是钛锆合金和钛。当种植体位于口腔颌面部时,IN更高,尤其是二氧化锆种植体(p≤0.05)。尽管两个视野中的二氧化锆种植体均导致图像质量下降,但总体上图像质量感知是一致的。
口腔颌面部存在种植体可能会对CBCT图像质量产生负面影响,其中二氧化锆的影响最大。