Ratanapob Niorn, VanLeeuwen John, McKenna Shawn, Wichtel Maureen, Rodriguez-Lecompte Juan C, Menzies Paula, Wichtel Jeffrey
Departments of Health Management (Ratanapob, VanLeeuwen, McKenna, M Wichtel), Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
Pathology and Microbiology (Rodriguez-Lecompte), Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, Prince Edward Island, Canada.
J Vet Diagn Invest. 2019 Jan;31(1):17-22. doi: 10.1177/1040638718819688. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
Blood samples were collected from late-gestation ewes to determine the agreement of a point-of-care (POC) Precision Xtra meter and a standard laboratory test for β-hydroxybutyrate (BHBA). Fresh whole blood samples were immediately tested with the POC instrument, and serum samples were analyzed with a standard commercial biochemical analyzer. Ewes were classified as having ketonemia if their BHBA concentrations were ≥800 µmol/L. Scatter plots, paired t-tests, Bland-Altman limits of agreement, and Gwet AC1 tests were used to compare results. The 2 tests had very good agreement. The values between instruments were not statistically different based on paired t-tests ( p = 0.312). The intercept and slope of a linear mixed model, containing the standard test results as an outcome and the POC meter results as a predictor, were 0.02 (95% CI: 0.00, 0.04) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96, 1.01), respectively. When the samples were classified into ketonemic classes (non-ketonemic and ketonemic) based on BHBA concentrations obtained from each test, the Gwet AC1 statistic was 0.94 (95% CI: 0.91, 0.97; p < 0.001). The ketosis classification agreed in 95% of samples. Based on the Bland-Altman plot and limits of agreement, the optimal cutoff to diagnose ketonemia with the POC meter was 1,000 µmol/L, which is 200 µmol/L higher than the laboratory BHBA medical decision limit. The Precision Xtra meter provided excellent correlation and substantial agreement with the standard laboratory technique for measuring blood BHBA in late-gestation ewes.
采集妊娠后期母羊的血样,以确定即时检验(POC)Precision Xtra血糖仪与β-羟基丁酸(BHBA)标准实验室检测方法的一致性。新鲜全血样本立即用POC仪器进行检测,血清样本则用标准商用生化分析仪进行分析。如果母羊的BHBA浓度≥800µmol/L,则被归类为患有酮血症。使用散点图、配对t检验、Bland-Altman一致性界限和Gwet AC1检验来比较结果。两种检测方法具有很好的一致性。根据配对t检验,仪器之间的值无统计学差异(p = 0.312)。以标准检测结果为结果变量、POC血糖仪结果为预测变量的线性混合模型的截距和斜率分别为0.02(95%CI:0.00,0.04)和0.98(95%CI:0.96,1.01)。当根据每项检测获得的BHBA浓度将样本分为酮血症类别(非酮血症和酮血症)时,Gwet AC1统计量为0.94(95%CI:0.91,0.97;p < 0.001)。95%的样本酮血症分类一致。根据Bland-Altman图和一致性界限,用POC血糖仪诊断酮血症的最佳临界值为1000µmol/L,比实验室BHBA医学决定限高200µmol/L。Precision Xtra血糖仪与测量妊娠后期母羊血液BHBA的标准实验室技术具有良好的相关性和高度一致性。