Key Laboratory of Behavioral Science, Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, 16 Lincui Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100101, China.
Department of Psychology, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
Mem Cognit. 2019 Feb;47(2):326-334. doi: 10.3758/s13421-018-0868-7.
For literate individuals, does the spoken production of language involve access to orthographic codes? Previous research has rendered mixed results, with a few positive findings contrasting with a range of null findings. In the current experiments, we chose spoken Mandarin as the target language in order to better dissociate sound from spelling. Mandarin speakers named coloured line drawings of common objects with adjective-noun phrases (e.g., /lan2/ /hua1ping2/, "blue vase"). Adjectives and nouns were semantically and phonologically unrelated on all trials, but on critical trials they shared an orthographic radical. In two experiments, this resulted in a significant facilitatory effect on naming latencies. We interpret these results as strong evidence for the claim that retrieval of phonological codes in spoken production involves the co-activation of orthographic representations.
对于有读写能力的人来说，语言的口语产生是否涉及到对拼写字码的访问？先前的研究结果喜忧参半，一些积极的发现与一系列空白的发现形成对比。在当前的实验中，我们选择汉语普通话作为目标语言，以便更好地将声音与拼写区分开来。普通话使用者用形容词-名词短语（例如，/lan2/ /hua1ping2/，“蓝花瓶”）来命名常见物体的彩色线条画。在所有试验中，形容词和名词在语义和语音上都是无关的，但在关键试验中，它们共享一个偏旁部首。在两项实验中，这导致命名潜伏期有显著的促进作用。我们将这些结果解释为有力的证据，证明口语产生中语音码的检索涉及到对拼写字符的共同激活。
