Cutler Anne, Davis Chris
Language Comprehension Department, Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics Nijmegen, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2012 Feb 7;3:18. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00018. eCollection 2012.
In three phoneme goodness rating experiments, listeners heard phonetic tokens varying along a continuum centered on /s/, occurring finally in isolated word or non-word tokens. An effect of spelling appeared in Experiment 1: native English-speakers' goodness ratings for the best /s/ tokens were significantly higher in words spelled with S (e.g., bless) than in words spelled with C (e.g., voice). Since the tokens were in fact identical in each word, this effect indicates less than optimal evaluation performance. No spelling effect appeared when non-native speakers rated the same materials in Experiment 2, indicating that the observed difference could not be due to acoustic characteristics of the S- versus C-words. In Experiment 3, native English-speakers' ratings for /s/ did not differ in non-words rhyming with words consistently spelled with S (e.g., pless) or with words consistently spelled with C (e.g., floice); i.e., no effects of lexical rhyme analogs appeared. It is concluded that the findings are better explained in terms of phonemic decisions drawing upon lexical information where convenient than by obligatory influence of lexical knowledge upon pre-lexical processing.
在三项音素优度评级实验中,听众听到了以/s/为中心连续变化的语音片段,这些片段出现在孤立的单词或非单词的词尾。拼写效应在实验1中出现:以英语为母语的人对最佳/s/片段的优度评级,在拼写为S的单词(如bless)中显著高于拼写为C的单词(如voice)。由于每个单词中的片段实际上是相同的,这种效应表明评估表现并非最佳。在实验2中,非英语母语者对相同材料进行评级时未出现拼写效应,这表明观察到的差异并非由于以S拼写的单词与以C拼写的单词的声学特征所致。在实验3中,以英语为母语的人对与始终拼写为S的单词押韵的非单词(如pless)和与始终拼写为C的单词押韵的非单词(如floice)中/s/的评级没有差异;也就是说,词汇押韵类似物没有产生影响。研究得出的结论是,与词汇知识对词前加工的强制性影响相比,利用便利的词汇信息进行音素决策能更好地解释这些发现。