The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Urology, Radboud University Hospital, Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
JAMA Oncol. 2019 Feb 1;5(2):164-170. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.5543.
In clinical practice, patients with primary metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have been offered cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by targeted therapy, but the optimal sequence of surgery and systemic therapy is unknown.
To examine whether a period of sunitinib therapy before CN improves outcome compared with immediate CN followed by sunitinib.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial began as a phase 3 trial on July 14, 2010, and continued until March 24, 2016, with a median follow-up of 3.3 years and a clinical cutoff date for this report of May 5, 2017. Patients with mRCC of clear cell subtype, resectable primary tumor, and 3 or fewer surgical risk factors were studied.
Immediate CN followed by sunitinib therapy vs treatment with 3 cycles of sunitinib followed by CN in the absence of progression followed by sunitinib therapy.
Progression-free survival was the primary end point, which needed a sample size of 458 patients. Because of poor accrual, the independent data monitoring committee endorsed reporting the intention-to-treat 28-week progression-free rate (PFR) instead. Overall survival (OS), adverse events, and postoperative progression were secondary end points.
The study closed after 5.7 years with 99 patients (80 men and 19 women; mean [SD] age, 60 [8.5] years). The 28-week PFR was 42% in the immediate CN arm (n = 50) and 43% in the deferred CN arm (n = 49) (P = .61). The intention-to-treat OS hazard ratio of deferred vs immediate CN was 0.57 (95% CI, 0.34-0.95; P = .03), with a median OS of 32.4 months (95% CI, 14.5-65.3 months) in the deferred CN arm and 15.0 months (95% CI, 9.3-29.5 months) in the immediate CN arm. In the deferred CN arm, 48 of 49 patients (98%; 95% CI, 89%-100%) received sunitinib vs 40 of 50 (80%; 95% CI, 67%-89%) in the immediate arm. Systemic progression before planned CN in the deferred CN arm resulted in a per-protocol recommendation against nephrectomy in 14 patients (29%; 95% CI, 18%-43%).
Deferred CN did not improve the 28-week PFR. With the deferred approach, more patients received sunitinib and OS results were higher. Pretreatment with sunitinib may identify patients with inherent resistance to systemic therapy before planned CN. This evidence complements recent data from randomized clinical trials to inform treatment decisions in patients with primary clear cell mRCC requiring sunitinib.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01099423.
在临床实践中,对于原发性转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)患者,已经提供了细胞减灭性肾切除术(CN)加靶向治疗,但手术和系统治疗的最佳顺序尚不清楚。
研究与立即 CN 加随后的舒尼替尼治疗相比,CN 前接受舒尼替尼治疗是否能改善预后。
设计、地点和参与者:这项随机临床试验于 2010 年 7 月 14 日开始作为一项 3 期试验,一直持续到 2016 年 3 月 24 日,中位随访 3.3 年,本次报告的临床截止日期为 2017 年 5 月 5 日。研究对象为透明细胞亚型 mRCC、可切除原发性肿瘤和 3 个以下手术危险因素的患者。
立即进行 CN 加舒尼替尼治疗,或先进行 3 个周期的舒尼替尼治疗,无进展后再进行 CN,然后继续舒尼替尼治疗。
无进展生存期是主要终点,需要 458 例患者的样本量。由于入组人数不佳,独立数据监测委员会支持报告意向治疗的 28 周无进展率(PFR)。总生存期(OS)、不良事件和术后进展是次要终点。
在经过 5.7 年的研究后,共有 99 例患者(80 例男性和 19 例女性;平均[标准差]年龄为 60[8.5]岁)完成了研究。立即 CN 组的 28 周 PFR 为 42%(n=50),延迟 CN 组为 43%(n=49)(P=0.61)。延迟 CN 组与立即 CN 组的意向治疗 OS 风险比为 0.57(95%CI,0.34-0.95;P=0.03),延迟 CN 组的中位 OS 为 32.4 个月(95%CI,14.5-65.3 个月),立即 CN 组为 15.0 个月(95%CI,9.3-29.5 个月)。在延迟 CN 组,49 例患者中的 48 例(98%;95%CI,89%-100%)接受了舒尼替尼治疗,而立即 CN 组中 50 例患者中的 40 例(80%;95%CI,67%-89%)接受了舒尼替尼治疗。在延迟 CN 组,计划进行 CN 前系统进展导致 14 例(29%;95%CI,18%-43%)患者按方案反对进行肾切除术。
延迟 CN 并未改善 28 周 PFR。采用延迟方法,更多的患者接受了舒尼替尼治疗,OS 结果更高。舒尼替尼的预先治疗可能会在计划进行 CN 前识别出对系统治疗有固有耐药性的患者。这一证据补充了最近随机临床试验的数据,为需要舒尼替尼治疗的原发性透明细胞 mRCC 患者的治疗决策提供了信息。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01099423。