Hanna Nawar, Sun Maxine, Meyer Christian P, Nguyen Paul L, Pal Sumanta K, Chang Steven L, de Velasco Guillermo, Trinh Quoc-Dien, Choueiri Toni K
Nawar Hanna, Maxine Sun, Christian P. Meyer, Paul L. Nguyen, Steven L. Chang, Guillermo de Velasco, Quoc-Dien Trinh, and Toni K. Choueiri, Brigham and Women's Hospital/Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; and Sumanta K. Pal, City of Hope, Duarte, CA.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Sep 20;34(27):3267-75. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.66.7931. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
The role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) has become unclear since the introduction of targeted therapies (TT). We sought to evaluate contemporary utilization rates of CN and to examine the survival benefit of CN compared with non-CN patients treated with TT.
We used the National Cancer Data Base to identify patients with clinical mRCC treated with TT between 2006 and 2013. The intervention of interest was CN. Multivariable logistic regression predicting receipt of CN was performed. Overall survival (OS) was examined using Cox regression models and incremental survival analyses were performed. Sensitivity analyses using propensity scores were conducted.
Of 15,390 patients treated with TT, 5,374 (35%) underwent CN between 2006 and 2013. Patients who were younger, privately insured, treated at an academic center, and had lower tumor stage and cN0 disease were more likely to undergo CN. The median OS of CN versus non-CN patients was 17.1 (95% CI, 16.3 to 18.0 months) versus 7.7 months (95% CI, 7.4 to 7.9 months; P < .001). In sensitivity analyses using propensity scores adjustment in addition to other available covariates, CN patients had a lower risk of any death (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.50; P < .001). The survival benefit of CN was +0.7 and +3.6 months in patients who survived ≤ 6 and ≤ 24 months, respectively, versus no CN.
CN is performed in three of 10 patients with mRCC who are receiving TT. Several patient and sociodemographic characteristics were associated with receipt of CN. When feasible, CN may offer an OS benefit when combined with TT.
自靶向治疗(TT)引入以来,减瘤性肾切除术(CN)在转移性肾细胞癌(mRCC)中的作用变得不明确。我们试图评估CN的当代应用率,并比较接受CN治疗的患者与接受TT治疗但未行CN的患者的生存获益情况。
我们使用国家癌症数据库来识别2006年至2013年间接受TT治疗的临床mRCC患者。感兴趣的干预措施是CN。进行了预测CN接受情况的多变量逻辑回归分析。使用Cox回归模型检查总生存期(OS)并进行增量生存分析。进行了使用倾向评分的敏感性分析。
在15390例接受TT治疗的患者中,2006年至2013年间有5374例(35%)接受了CN。年龄较小、有私人保险、在学术中心接受治疗、肿瘤分期较低且cN0疾病的患者更有可能接受CN。CN患者与未行CN患者的中位OS分别为17.1个月(95%CI,16.3至18.0个月)和7.7个月(95%CI,7.4至7.9个月;P<.001)。在使用倾向评分调整以及其他可用协变量的敏感性分析中,CN患者的任何死亡风险较低(风险比,0.45;95%CI,0.40至0.50;P<.001)。与未行CN相比,在生存期≤6个月和≤24个月的患者中,CN的生存获益分别为+0.7个月和+3.6个月。
在接受TT治疗的10例mRCC患者中,有3例接受了CN。一些患者和社会人口统计学特征与CN的接受情况相关。在可行的情况下,CN与TT联合使用时可能会带来OS获益。