Alamsyah Mohammad Taufiq, Prapiska Fauriski Febrian, Warli Syah Mirsya
Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia-Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Indonesia.
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, University of North Sumatra-Haji Adam Malik General Hospital, Indonesia.
Asian J Urol. 2025 Apr;12(2):204-209. doi: 10.1016/j.ajur.2024.06.003. Epub 2024 Aug 3.
Stage IV renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is associated with a significant decrease in survival rates. Cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) is one of the treatments for stage IV RCC. However, there are studies showing that delayed CN might have benefits for the survival of the patients. We aimed to examine the impact of deferred CN on the survival of patients with advanced RCC in relation to sequential management with targeted therapy (TT).
A literature search was conducted in PubMed, EMBASE, EBSCOhost, MedRxiv, and Scopus. We included the randomized clinical trial and non-randomized study of intervention comparing the overall survival (OS) of upfront CN with deferred CN in patients with advanced RCC undergoing TT. Meta-analysis was carried out using Review Manager v5.4 software. The fixed-effect and random-effects models were used to obtain pooled estimates using the hazard ratio and standard error, presented using the forest plot with 95% confidence interval.
Four studies were analyzed quantitatively. Our analysis revealed that patients with upfront TT followed by deferred CN had significantly improved OS compared to those who underwent upfront CN followed by TT (hazard ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.64, <0.001).
The findings of the study suggest that considering upfront TT followed by deferred CN may lead to improved OS in patients with advanced RCC. However, more research is needed to fully understand the role, optimal timing, and sequencing of TT and CN in the treatment of advanced RCC.
IV期肾细胞癌(RCC)与生存率显著下降相关。减瘤性肾切除术(CN)是IV期RCC的治疗方法之一。然而,有研究表明延迟CN可能对患者生存有益。我们旨在探讨延迟CN对晚期RCC患者生存的影响,并与靶向治疗(TT)的序贯管理相关。
在PubMed、EMBASE、EBSCOhost、MedRxiv和Scopus中进行文献检索。我们纳入了比较接受TT的晚期RCC患者中 upfront CN与延迟CN的总生存期(OS)的随机临床试验和非随机干预研究。使用Review Manager v5.4软件进行荟萃分析。采用固定效应和随机效应模型,使用风险比和标准误获得合并估计值,并通过带有95%置信区间的森林图呈现。
对四项研究进行了定量分析。我们的分析表明,与先进行 upfront CN再进行TT的患者相比,先进行TT然后延迟CN的患者OS显著改善(风险比0.50,95%置信区间0.40 - 0.64,<0.001)。
该研究结果表明,考虑先进行TT然后延迟CN可能会改善晚期RCC患者的OS。然而,需要更多研究来全面了解TT和CN在晚期RCC治疗中的作用、最佳时机和顺序。