Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, California.
Division of Infectious Diseases, Stanford University School of Medicine, California.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. 2020 Apr 30;9(2):110-117. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piy125.
Blood cultures are obtained routinely for infants and young children for the evaluation for serious bacterial infection. Isolation of organisms that represent possible contaminants poses a management challenge. The prevalence of bacteremia reported in this population is potentially biased by inconsistent contaminant categorization reported in the literature. Our aim was to systematically review the definition and reporting of contaminants within the literature regarding infant bacteremia.
A search of studies published between 1986 and mid-September 2016 was conducted using Medline/PubMed. Included studies examined children aged 0 to 36 months for whom blood culture was performed as part of a serious bacterial infection evaluation. Studies that involved children in an intensive care unit, prematurely born children, and immunocompromised children or those with an indwelling catheter/device were excluded. Data extracted included contaminant designation methodology, organisms classified as contaminants and pathogens, and contamination and bacteremia rates.
Our search yielded 1335 articles, and 69 of them met our inclusion criteria. The methodology used to define contaminants was described in 37 (54%) study reports, and 16 (23%) reported contamination rates, which ranged from 0.5% to 22.8%. Studies defined contaminants according to organism species (n = 22), according to the patient's clinical management (n = 4), and using multifactorial approaches (n = 11). Many common organisms, particularly Gram-positive cocci, were inconsistently categorized as pathogens or contaminants.
Reporting and categorization of blood culture contamination are inconsistent within the pediatric bacteremia literature, which limits our ability to estimate the prevalence of bacteremia. Although contaminants are characterized most frequently according to organism, we found inconsistency regarding the classification of certain common organisms. A standardized approach to contaminant reporting is needed.
血液培养常用于评估婴幼儿严重细菌感染。分离出代表可能污染物的生物体给管理带来了挑战。该人群报告的菌血症患病率可能受到文献中不一致的污染物分类的影响。我们的目的是系统地审查有关婴儿菌血症文献中污染物的定义和报告。
使用 Medline/PubMed 对 1986 年至 9 月中旬发表的研究进行了搜索。纳入的研究对象为年龄在 0 至 36 个月之间的儿童,其血液培养作为严重细菌感染评估的一部分。排除了涉及重症监护病房、早产儿、免疫功能低下或留置导管/装置的儿童的研究。提取的数据包括污染物指定方法、被归类为污染物和病原体的生物体以及污染和菌血症的比率。
我们的搜索结果产生了 1335 篇文章,其中 69 篇符合我们的纳入标准。37 篇(54%)研究报告描述了定义污染物的方法,16 篇(23%)报告了污染率,范围从 0.5%到 22.8%。研究根据生物体种类(n=22)、患者的临床管理(n=4)和使用多因素方法(n=11)来定义污染物。许多常见的生物体,特别是革兰氏阳性球菌,被不一致地归类为病原体或污染物。
儿科菌血症文献中血液培养污染的报告和分类不一致,这限制了我们估计菌血症患病率的能力。尽管污染物最常根据生物体来描述,但我们发现某些常见生物体的分类存在不一致。需要采用标准化的污染物报告方法。