Suppr超能文献

无血清条件下脐带和羊膜间充质基质细胞的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of mesenchymal stromal cells from umbilical cord and amniotic membrane in xeno-free conditions.

作者信息

Mu Yongxu, Wu Xiaoyun, Hao Zhiming

机构信息

Department of Rheumatology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Pvovince, China.

Department of Interventional Treatment, the First Affiliated Hospital of Baotou Medical College, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou, Inner Mongolia, China.

出版信息

BMC Cell Biol. 2018 Dec 13;19(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12860-018-0178-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Within the past years, umbilical cord (UC) and amniotic membrane (AM) expanded in human platelet lysate (PL) have been found to become increasingly candidate of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) in preclinical and clinical studies. Different sources of MSCs have different properties, and lead to different therapeutic applications. However, the similarity and differences between the AMMSCs and UCMSCs in PL remain unclear.

RESULTS

In this study, we conduct a direct head-to-head comparison with regard to biological characteristics (morphology, immunophenotype, self-renewal capacity, and trilineage differentiation potential) and immunosuppression effects of AMMSCs and UCMSCs expanded in PL. Our results indicated that AMMSCs showed similar morphology, immunophenotype, proliferative capacity and colony efficiency with UCMSCs. Moreover, no significantly differences in osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiation potential were observed between the two types of cells. However, AMMSCs exhibited higher PGE expression and IDO activity compared with UCMSCs when primed by IFN-γ and (or) TNF-α induction, and AMMSCs showed a higher inhibitory effect on PBMCs proliferation than UCMSCs.

CONCLUSION

The results suggest that AMMSCs expanded in PL showed similar morphology, immunophenotype, self-renewal capacity, and trilineage differentiation potential with UCMSCs. However, AMMSCs possessed superior immunosuppression effects in comparison with UCMSCs. These results suggest that AMMSCs in PL might be more suitable than UCMSCs for treatment of immune diseases. This work provides a novel insight into choosing the appropriate source of MSCs for treatment of immune diseases.

摘要

背景

在过去几年中,在人血小板裂解液(PL)中扩增的脐带(UC)和羊膜(AM)已在临床前和临床研究中越来越多地成为间充质基质细胞(MSC)的候选来源。不同来源的MSC具有不同的特性,并导致不同的治疗应用。然而,PL中AMMSC和UCMSC之间的异同仍不清楚。

结果

在本研究中,我们对PL中扩增的AMMSC和UCMSC的生物学特性(形态、免疫表型、自我更新能力和三系分化潜能)和免疫抑制作用进行了直接的头对头比较。我们的结果表明,AMMSC与UCMSC在形态、免疫表型、增殖能力和集落形成效率方面相似。此外,在两种细胞之间未观察到成骨、成软骨和成脂分化潜能的显著差异。然而,当用IFN-γ和(或)TNF-α诱导时,AMMSC与UCMSC相比表现出更高的PGE表达和IDO活性,并且AMMSC对PBMCs增殖的抑制作用比UCMSC更高。

结论

结果表明,PL中扩增的AMMSC与UCMSC在形态、免疫表型、自我更新能力和三系分化潜能方面相似。然而,与UCMSC相比,AMMSC具有更强的免疫抑制作用。这些结果表明,PL中的AMMSC可能比UCMSC更适合治疗免疫疾病。这项工作为选择合适的MSC来源治疗免疫疾病提供了新的见解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/15f9/6293527/eefc5a027632/12860_2018_178_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验