a The Peter Harrison Centre for Disability Sport, School for Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences , Loughborough University , Loughborough , UK.
b Exercise Metabolism Research Group, Department of Kinesiology , McMaster University , Hamilton , Canada.
J Sports Sci. 2019 Mar;37(6):701-707. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2018.1522941. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
This study compares test-retest reliability and peak exercise responses from ramp-incremented (RAMP) and maximal perceptually-regulated (PRET) exercise tests during arm crank exercise in individuals reliant on manual wheelchair propulsion (MWP). Ten untrained participants completed four trials over 2-weeks (two RAMP (0-40 W + 5-10 W · min) trials and two PRET. PRET consisted of five, 2-min stages performed at Ratings of Perceived Exertion (RPE) 11, 13, 15, 17 and 20). Participants freely changed the power output to match the required RPE. Gas exchange variables, heart rate, power output, RPE and affect were determined throughout trials. The V̇O from RAMP (14.8 ± 5.5 ml · kg · min) and PRET (13.9 ± 5.2 ml · kg · min) trials were not different (P = 0.08). Measurement error was 1.7 and 2.2 ml · kg · min and coefficient of variation 5.9% and 8.1% for measuring V̇O from RAMP and PRET, respectively. Affect was more positive at RPE 13 (P = 0.02), 15 (P = 0.01) and 17 (P = 0.01) during PRET. Findings suggest that PRET can be used to measure V̇O in participants reliant on MWP and leads to a more positive affective response compared to RAMP.
本研究比较了在依赖手动轮椅推进的个体进行手臂曲柄运动时,递增 ramp 式(RAMP)和最大感知调节(PRET)运动试验的测试-重测可靠性和峰值运动反应。10 名未经训练的参与者在 2 周内完成了 4 次试验(2 次 RAMP(0-40 W + 5-10 W·min)试验和 2 次 PRET。PRET 由 5 个 2 分钟的阶段组成,在感觉用力评分(RPE)为 11、13、15、17 和 20 时进行)。参与者可以自由地改变功率输出以匹配所需的 RPE。在整个试验过程中确定了气体交换变量、心率、功率输出、RPE 和情感。RAMP(14.8±5.5 ml·kg·min)和 PRET(13.9±5.2 ml·kg·min)试验的 V̇O 没有差异(P=0.08)。测量误差分别为 1.7 和 2.2 ml·kg·min,RAMP 和 PRET 测量 V̇O 的变异系数分别为 5.9%和 8.1%。在 PRET 期间,RPE 为 13(P=0.02)、15(P=0.01)和 17(P=0.01)时,情感更为积极。研究结果表明,PRET 可用于测量依赖于 MWP 的参与者的 V̇O,并且与 RAMP 相比,PRET 会导致更积极的情感反应。