• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估虐待后虐待性头部创伤的概率估计。

Estimating the probability of abusive head trauma after abuse evaluation.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Health Children's Hospital, Hershey, PA, United States.

Department of Public Health Sciences, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA, United States.

出版信息

Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Feb;88:266-274. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.11.015. Epub 2018 Dec 11.

DOI:10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.11.015
PMID:30551063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6333504/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based, patient-specific estimates of abusive head trauma probability can inform physicians' decisions to evaluate, confirm, exclude, and/or report suspected child abuse.

OBJECTIVE

To derive a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma that incorporates the (positive or negative) predictive contributions of patients' completed skeletal surveys and retinal exams.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

500 acutely head-injured children under three years of age hospitalized for intensive care at one of 18 sites between 2010 and 2013.

METHODS

Secondary analysis of an existing, cross-sectional, prospective dataset, including (1) multivariable logistic regression to impute the results of abuse evaluations never ordered or completed, (2) regularized logistic regression to derive a novel clinical prediction rule that incorporates the results of completed abuse evaluations, and (3) application of the new prediction rule to calculate patient-specific estimates of abusive head trauma probability for observed combinations of its predictor variables.

RESULTS

Applying a mean probability threshold of >0.5 to classify patients as abused, the 7-variable clinical prediction rule derived in this study demonstrated sensitivity 0.73 (95% CI: 0.66-0.79) and specificity 0.87 (95% CI: 0.82-0.90). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.88 (95% CI: 0.85-0.92). Patient-specific estimates of abusive head trauma probability for 72 observed combinations of its seven predictor variables ranged from 0.04 (95% CI: 0.02-0.08) to 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Seven variables facilitate patient-specific estimation of abusive head trauma probability after abuse evaluation in intensive care settings.

摘要

背景

基于证据的、针对患者个体的虐待性头部创伤可能性的评估可以为医生提供决策依据,以评估、确认、排除和/或报告疑似儿童虐待的情况。

目的

制定一个包含(阳性或阴性)患者完成的骨骼扫描和视网膜检查的预测贡献的儿科虐待性头部创伤临床预测规则。

参与者和设置

2010 年至 2013 年期间,18 个地点之一的重症监护病房中因头部受伤住院的 500 名三岁以下急性颅脑损伤儿童。

方法

对现有、横断面、前瞻性数据集进行二次分析,包括(1)多变量逻辑回归来推断从未下达或完成的虐待评估结果,(2)正则化逻辑回归来推导一个新的临床预测规则,纳入已完成的虐待评估结果,以及(3)应用新的预测规则来计算观察到的其预测变量组合的患者个体的虐待性头部创伤概率估计。

结果

应用平均概率阈值>0.5 将患者分类为虐待性,本研究中得出的 7 变量临床预测规则显示敏感性为 0.73(95%CI:0.66-0.79),特异性为 0.87(95%CI:0.82-0.90)。接收者操作特征曲线下面积为 0.88(95%CI:0.85-0.92)。7 个预测变量的 72 种观察到的组合的患者个体的虐待性头部创伤概率估计值从 0.04(95%CI:0.02-0.08)到 0.98(95%CI:0.96-0.99)不等。

结论

在重症监护环境中进行虐待评估后,七个变量有助于患者个体的虐待性头部创伤概率的估计。

相似文献

1
Estimating the probability of abusive head trauma after abuse evaluation.评估虐待后虐待性头部创伤的概率估计。
Child Abuse Negl. 2019 Feb;88:266-274. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2018.11.015. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
2
Derivation of a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.儿童虐待性头部创伤临床预测规则的推导。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;14(2):210-20. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182712b09.
3
Validation of the PediBIRN-7 clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.验证 PediBIRN-7 临床预测规则在儿科虐待性头部创伤中的应用。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Jun;152:106799. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106799. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
4
Screening for pediatric abusive head trauma: Are three variables enough?儿童虐待性头部创伤筛查:三个变量足够吗?
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Mar;125:105518. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105518. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
5
Validation of a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.儿童虐待性头部创伤临床预测规则的验证
Pediatrics. 2014 Dec;134(6):e1537-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1329. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
6
Potential Impact of a Validated Screening Tool for Pediatric Abusive Head Trauma.一种经过验证的小儿虐待性头部创伤筛查工具的潜在影响。
J Pediatr. 2015 Dec;167(6):1375-81.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.09.018. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
7
A Cluster Randomized Trial to Reduce Missed Abusive Head Trauma in Pediatric Intensive Care Settings.一项旨在减少儿科重症监护环境中虐待性头部创伤漏诊的整群随机试验。
J Pediatr. 2021 Sep;236:260-268.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.03.055. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
8
Clinical prediction rules for abusive head trauma: a systematic review.临床虐待性头部创伤预测规则:系统评价。
Arch Dis Child. 2018 Aug;103(8):776-783. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2017-313748. Epub 2018 Apr 5.
9
Characteristics that distinguish accidental from abusive injury in hospitalized young children with head trauma.住院头部外伤幼儿中区分意外伤与虐待伤的特征。
Pediatrics. 2004 Jul;114(1):165-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.114.1.165.
10
Estimating the Relevance of Historical Red Flags in the Diagnosis of Abusive Head Trauma.评估历史“警示征象”在诊断虐待性头部创伤中的相关性。
J Pediatr. 2020 Mar;218:178-183.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.11.010. Epub 2020 Jan 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathophysiological hypotheses of the triad in abusive infant shaking: A systematic review and analysis of corroborated cases.虐待性婴儿摇晃三联征的病理生理假说:对确诊病例的系统评价与分析
Forensic Sci Int Synerg. 2025 Jun 30;11:100618. doi: 10.1016/j.fsisyn.2025.100618. eCollection 2025 Dec.
2
Shaking into deficits: investigating behavioural and neuropathological outcomes associated with a novel preclinical model of infant abusive head trauma.震颤导致功能缺陷:探究与一种新型婴儿虐待性头部创伤临床前模型相关的行为和神经病理学结果
Acta Neuropathol Commun. 2025 May 15;13(1):100. doi: 10.1186/s40478-025-02029-5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Validation of the Pittsburgh Infant Brain Injury Score for Abusive Head Trauma.匹兹堡婴儿脑损伤评分用于虐待性头部创伤的验证。
Pediatrics. 2016 Jul;138(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-3756. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
2
Potential Impact of a Validated Screening Tool for Pediatric Abusive Head Trauma.一种经过验证的小儿虐待性头部创伤筛查工具的潜在影响。
J Pediatr. 2015 Dec;167(6):1375-81.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2015.09.018. Epub 2015 Oct 23.
3
Validation of a Prediction Tool for Abusive Head Trauma.验证用于虐待性头部创伤的预测工具。
Promoting Health Equity for Children With Special Health Care Needs and Child Welfare Involvement.
促进有特殊医疗需求儿童的健康公平及儿童福利参与。
Hosp Pediatr. 2025 Feb 1;15(2):186-193. doi: 10.1542/hpeds.2024-008075.
4
Validation of the PediBIRN-7 clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.验证 PediBIRN-7 临床预测规则在儿科虐待性头部创伤中的应用。
Child Abuse Negl. 2024 Jun;152:106799. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2024.106799. Epub 2024 Apr 24.
5
An analysis of physicians' diagnostic reasoning regarding pediatric abusive head trauma.对儿科虐待性头部创伤相关的医生诊断推理的分析。
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Jul;129:105666. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105666. Epub 2022 May 11.
6
Diagnosis of Abusive Head Trauma : Neurosurgical Perspective.虐待性头部创伤的诊断:神经外科视角
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2022 May;65(3):370-379. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0284. Epub 2022 Apr 26.
7
Screening for pediatric abusive head trauma: Are three variables enough?儿童虐待性头部创伤筛查:三个变量足够吗?
Child Abuse Negl. 2022 Mar;125:105518. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2022.105518. Epub 2022 Jan 22.
8
The role of retinal imaging in the management of abusive head trauma cases.视网膜成像在虐待性头部创伤病例管理中的作用。
Int J Legal Med. 2022 Jul;136(4):1009-1016. doi: 10.1007/s00414-021-02750-5. Epub 2022 Jan 24.
9
Traumatic Head Injury and the Diagnosis of Abuse: A Cluster Analysis.创伤性头部损伤与虐待的诊断:聚类分析。
Pediatrics. 2022 Jan 1;149(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2021-051742.
10
A Cluster Randomized Trial to Reduce Missed Abusive Head Trauma in Pediatric Intensive Care Settings.一项旨在减少儿科重症监护环境中虐待性头部创伤漏诊的整群随机试验。
J Pediatr. 2021 Sep;236:260-268.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.03.055. Epub 2021 Mar 31.
Pediatrics. 2015 Aug;136(2):290-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3993.
4
Validation of a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.儿童虐待性头部创伤临床预测规则的验证
Pediatrics. 2014 Dec;134(6):e1537-44. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1329. Epub 2014 Nov 17.
5
Derivation of a clinical prediction rule for pediatric abusive head trauma.儿童虐待性头部创伤临床预测规则的推导。
Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2013 Feb;14(2):210-20. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182712b09.
6
Dealing with missing outcome data in randomized trials and observational studies.处理随机试验和观察性研究中缺失的结局数据。
Am J Epidemiol. 2012 Feb 1;175(3):210-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwr302. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
7
Estimating the probability of abusive head trauma: a pooled analysis.估算虐待性头部创伤的概率:一项汇总分析。
Pediatrics. 2011 Sep;128(3):e550-64. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-2949. Epub 2011 Aug 15.
8
Bruising characteristics discriminating physical child abuse from accidental trauma.区分躯体虐待儿童与意外创伤的淤青特征。
Pediatrics. 2010 Jan;125(1):67-74. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-3632. Epub 2009 Dec 7.
9
Using hospital discharge data to track inflicted traumatic brain injury.利用医院出院数据追踪外伤性脑损伤。
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Apr;34(4 Suppl):S157-62. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.12.021.
10
Incidence and demography of non-accidental head injury in southeast Scotland from a national database.基于国家数据库的苏格兰东南部非意外性头部损伤的发病率及人口统计学特征
Am J Prev Med. 2008 Apr;34(4 Suppl):S126-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.016.