Cherry Health, 100 Cherry Street, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA; Division of Psychiatry and Behavioral Medicine, Michigan State University, College of Human Medicine, Secchia Center, Rm 482, 15 Michigan Street, Grand Rapids, MI 49503, USA.
Dartmouth Psychiatric Research Center, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 2 Pillsbury Street, Suite 401, Concord, NH 03301, USA.
Schizophr Res. 2019 Apr;206:200-208. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.11.026. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
Technology-delivered healthcare interventions may enhance dissemination of evidence-based treatments in low-resource areas. These interventions may be accessed 'on-demand,' including after hours. Patients with schizophrenia do engage with technological aids but when/how they would utilize these tools is not known.
We conducted a large, prospective, ten-site, longitudinal study of four technology-assisted interventions for patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders within 60 days of psychiatric hospital discharge, a high risk period. One tool employed was a smartphone intervention called 'FOCUS,' which could be used by patients as needed, providing help in five content areas: medications, mood, social, sleep and voices. Each login was date- and time-stamped as occurring during normal clinic hours, or 'off-hours,' and the pattern of use described.
347 of 368 patients utilized FOCUS during the 6-month study. There were a total of 75,447 FOCUS logins; 35,739 (47.4%) were self-initiated and 38,139 (50.6%) were off-hours. 18,450 of the logins during off-hours were self-initiated (24.5%). No differences in average usage per month were found based on race/ethnicity. A subset of 'high utilizers' (n = 152, 43.8%) self-initiated use of all five FOCUS modules both on- and off-hours. They tended to be women, >35 years old, and had a high school diploma or greater.
Most patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders recently discharged from the hospital utilized a smartphone intervention targeted to address troublesome residual symptoms. One quarter of the total smartphone utilization was self-initiated off-hours, indicating the potential utility of this tool to extend support for patients during periods of elevated risk.
技术提供的医疗干预措施可能会增强在资源匮乏地区推广基于证据的治疗方法。这些干预措施可以“按需”获取,包括下班后。患有精神分裂症的患者确实会使用技术辅助工具,但他们何时以及如何使用这些工具尚不清楚。
我们在精神科医院出院后 60 天内对 4 种针对精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的技术辅助干预措施进行了一项大型、前瞻性、十个地点、纵向研究,这是一个高风险时期。使用的一种工具是名为“FOCUS”的智能手机干预措施,患者可以根据需要使用,在五个内容领域提供帮助:药物、情绪、社交、睡眠和声音。每次登录都会记录日期和时间,记录为在正常诊所时间或“非工作时间”发生,并描述使用模式。
在 6 个月的研究期间,368 名患者中有 347 名使用了 FOCUS。共有 75447 次 FOCUS 登录;35739 次(47.4%)是自行发起的,38139 次(50.6%)是非工作时间发起的。非工作时间发起的登录中有 18450 次(24.5%)是自行发起的。基于种族/民族,发现每月平均使用量没有差异。“高使用者”(n=152,43.8%)的一个子集在工作时间和非工作时间都自行使用了所有五个 FOCUS 模块。他们往往是女性,年龄超过 35 岁,并且拥有高中文凭或更高学历。
大多数最近从医院出院的精神分裂症谱系障碍患者使用了针对解决麻烦的残留症状的智能手机干预措施。智能手机总使用量的四分之一是自行发起的非工作时间使用,这表明该工具在患者风险较高期间为他们提供支持的潜力。