Suppr超能文献

基于人形机器人的分心干预对儿童静脉穿刺疼痛影响的随机对照试验研究方案。

Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of humanoid robot-based distraction for venipuncture pain in children.

作者信息

Ali Samina, Sivakumar Mithra, Beran Tanya, Scott Shannon D, Vandermeer Ben, Curtis Sarah, Jou Hsing, Hartling Lisa

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

Women & Children's Health Research Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2018 Dec 14;8(12):e023366. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-023366.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Intravenous insertion (IVI) is a very common procedure in the emergency department (ED). IVI is often painful and stressful for both children and their families. Currently, distraction therapy is not used as a standard of care for IVI in North America. We propose that interaction with a humanoid robot may effectively distract children during IVI thereby reducing their pain and distress.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This randomised controlled superiority trial will be conducted in a Canadian paediatric ED. We plan to recruit 80 patients. Children will be eligible if they (1) are 6 to 11 years of age, (2) need an IVI, (3) are fully conscious and alert, (4) have sufficient knowledge of the English language to understand and complete the study assessments and (5) are accompanied by a legal guardian. Our primary objective is to compare patient-reported pain and distress with the use of distraction (via a humanoid robot) versus standard care in children. The primary outcomes will be (1) self-reported pain, as measured by the Faces Pain Scale-Revised and (2) observed distress, as measured by the Observational Scale of Behavioural Distress-Revised. Secondary outcomes will include (1) measuring parental anxiety, (2) examining the association between parental anxiety and child outcomes and (3) children's degree of engagement with the humanoid robot via the Intrinsic Motivation Inventory tool. First enrolment occurred in April 2017 and is ongoing.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the Health Research Ethics Board (University of Alberta). Informed consent to participate will be obtained from all participants' parents/guardian, in conjunction with assent from the participant themselves. This study data will be submitted for publication regardless of results. Purchase of the robot was facilitated through a Stollery Children's Hospital Foundation donation. Recruitment costs are supported by the Women and Children's Health Research Institute.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT02997631; Pre-results.

摘要

引言

静脉穿刺在急诊科是一项非常常见的操作。静脉穿刺对儿童及其家人来说往往既痛苦又有压力。目前,在北美,分心疗法并非静脉穿刺护理的标准方法。我们提出,与类人机器人互动可能会在静脉穿刺过程中有效分散儿童的注意力,从而减轻他们的疼痛和痛苦。

方法与分析

这项随机对照优势试验将在加拿大一家儿科急诊科进行。我们计划招募80名患者。符合以下条件的儿童将被纳入研究:(1)年龄在6至11岁之间;(2)需要进行静脉穿刺;(3)意识完全清醒且警觉;(4)具备足够的英语知识以理解并完成研究评估;(5)有法定监护人陪同。我们的主要目标是比较儿童在使用分心方法(通过类人机器人)与标准护理时,患者报告的疼痛和痛苦程度。主要结局将包括:(1)通过面部疼痛量表修订版测量的自我报告疼痛;(2)通过行为痛苦观察量表修订版测量的观察到的痛苦。次要结局将包括:(1)测量父母的焦虑程度;(2)研究父母焦虑与儿童结局之间的关联;(3)通过内在动机量表工具评估儿童与类人机器人的互动程度。首次入组于2017年4月开始,目前仍在进行中。

伦理与传播

本研究已获得健康研究伦理委员会(阿尔伯塔大学)的批准。将在获得所有参与者父母/监护人知情同意的同时,取得参与者本人的同意。无论研究结果如何,本研究数据都将提交发表。购买机器人的资金由斯托雷里儿童医院基金会捐赠提供。招募成本由妇女和儿童健康研究所提供支持。

试验注册号

NCT02997631;预结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2487/6303653/dd486ea6c24b/bmjopen-2018-023366f01.jpg

相似文献

5
Music to reduce pain and distress in the pediatric emergency department: a randomized clinical trial.
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Sep;167(9):826-35. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.200.
9
Children's Fear and Pain During Medical Procedures: A Quality Improvement Study With a Humanoid Robot.
Can J Nurs Res. 2020 Dec;52(4):328-334. doi: 10.1177/0844562119862742. Epub 2019 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

2
Effects of artificial intelligence aibo intervention on alleviating distress and fear in children.
Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health. 2022 Nov 23;16(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s13034-022-00519-1.

本文引用的文献

1
Psychological interventions for needle-related procedural pain and distress in children and adolescents.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 4;10(10):CD005179. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005179.pub4.
3
An Evidence-Based Approach to Minimizing Acute Procedural Pain in the Emergency Department and Beyond.
Pediatr Emerg Care. 2016 Jan;32(1):36-42; quiz 43-4. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0000000000000669.
4
Far From "Just a Poke": Common Painful Needle Procedures and the Development of Needle Fear.
Clin J Pain. 2015 Oct;31(10 Suppl):S3-11. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000272.
5
Quality indicators for the assessment and management of pain in the emergency department: a systematic review.
Pain Res Manag. 2014 Nov-Dec;19(6):e179-90. doi: 10.1155/2014/269140. Epub 2014 Oct 22.
7
Paediatric pain management practice and policies across Alberta emergency departments.
Paediatr Child Health. 2014 Apr;19(4):190-4. doi: 10.1093/pch/19.4.190.
8
Constructing and deconstructing the gate theory of pain.
Pain. 2014 Feb;155(2):210-216. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.12.010. Epub 2013 Dec 12.
10
Music to reduce pain and distress in the pediatric emergency department: a randomized clinical trial.
JAMA Pediatr. 2013 Sep;167(9):826-35. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2013.200.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验