• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非甾体或阿片类镇痛药用于治疗 6 至 17 岁肌肉骨骼损伤儿童的两项互补试验研究方案(No OUCH 研究)。

Study protocol for two complementary trials of non-steroidal or opioid analgesia use for children aged 6 to 17 years with musculoskeletal injuries (the No OUCH study).

机构信息

Pediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Women and Children's Health Research Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):e035177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035177.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035177
PMID:32565458
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7311068/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Musculoskeletal (MSK) injuries are a frequent cause for emergency department (ED) visits in children. MSK injuries are associated with moderate-to-severe pain in most children, yet recent research confirms that the management of children's pain in the ED remains inadequate. Clinicians are seeking better oral analgesic options for MSK injury pain with demonstrated efficacy and an excellent safety profile. This study aims to determine the efficacy and safety of adding oral acetaminophen or oral hydromorphone to oral ibuprofen and interpret this information within the context of parent/caregiver preference.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Using a novel preference-informed complementary trial design, two simultaneous trials are being conducted. Parents/caregivers of children presenting to the ED with acute limb injury will be approached and they will decide which trial they wish to participate in: an opioid-inclusive trial or a non-opioid trial. Both trials will follow randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, superiority-trial methodology and will enrol a minimum of 536 children across six Canadian paediatric EDs. Children will be eligible if they are 6 to 17 years of age and if they present to the ED with an acute limb injury and a self-reported verbal Numerical Rating Scale pain score ≥5. The primary objective is to determine the effectiveness of oral ibuprofen+oral hydromorphone versus oral ibuprofen+oral acetaminophen versus oral ibuprofen alone. Recruitment was launched in April 2019.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study has been approved by the Health Research Ethics Board (University of Alberta), and by appropriate ethics boards at all recruiting centres. Informed consent will be obtained from parents/guardians of all participants, in conjunction with assent from the participants themselves. Study data will be submitted for publication regardless of results. This study is funded through a Canadian Institutes of Health Research grant.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03767933, first registered on 07 December 2018.

摘要

介绍

肌肉骨骼(MSK)损伤是儿童急诊(ED)就诊的常见原因。MSK 损伤在大多数儿童中伴有中度至重度疼痛,但最近的研究证实,ED 中儿童疼痛的管理仍然不足。临床医生正在寻找更好的口服镇痛选择,用于 MSK 损伤疼痛,具有疗效和出色的安全性。本研究旨在确定口服对乙酰氨基酚或口服氢吗啡酮联合口服布洛芬治疗 MSK 损伤疼痛的疗效和安全性,并在家长/照顾者偏好的背景下解释这些信息。

方法和分析

使用一种新颖的偏好信息补充试验设计,正在进行两项同时进行的试验。急性肢体损伤就诊于 ED 的儿童的家长/照顾者将被接触,他们将决定他们希望参加哪个试验:包括阿片类药物的试验或不包括阿片类药物的试验。两项试验都将遵循随机、双盲、安慰剂对照、优效性试验方法,在加拿大六家儿科 ED 共招募至少 536 名儿童。如果儿童年龄在 6 至 17 岁之间,并且 ED 就诊时有急性肢体损伤和自我报告的口头数字评分量表疼痛评分≥5,他们将有资格参加。主要目的是确定口服布洛芬+口服氢吗啡酮与口服布洛芬+口服对乙酰氨基酚与口服布洛芬单独使用的有效性。招募于 2019 年 4 月开始。

伦理和传播

该研究已获得阿尔伯塔大学健康研究伦理委员会和所有参与中心的适当伦理委员会的批准。将从所有参与者的父母/监护人那里获得知情同意,并获得参与者本人的同意。无论结果如何,研究数据都将提交发表。该研究得到了加拿大卫生研究院的资助。

试验注册号

NCT03767933,于 2018 年 12 月 7 日首次注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc8/7311068/5acf1e3bf430/bmjopen-2019-035177f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc8/7311068/ed752d4feb6c/bmjopen-2019-035177f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc8/7311068/5acf1e3bf430/bmjopen-2019-035177f02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc8/7311068/ed752d4feb6c/bmjopen-2019-035177f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fc8/7311068/5acf1e3bf430/bmjopen-2019-035177f02.jpg

相似文献

1
Study protocol for two complementary trials of non-steroidal or opioid analgesia use for children aged 6 to 17 years with musculoskeletal injuries (the No OUCH study).非甾体或阿片类镇痛药用于治疗 6 至 17 岁肌肉骨骼损伤儿童的两项互补试验研究方案(No OUCH 研究)。
BMJ Open. 2020 Jun 21;10(6):e035177. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-035177.
2
Non-steroidal or opioid analgesia use for children with musculoskeletal injuries (the No OUCH study): statistical analysis plan.非甾体类或阿片类镇痛药用于肌肉骨骼损伤儿童(“无疼痛”研究):统计分析计划
Trials. 2020 Sep 3;21(1):759. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04503-y.
3
Ibuprofen vs acetaminophen vs their combination in the relief of musculoskeletal pain in the ED: a randomized, controlled trial.布洛芬与对乙酰氨基酚及其联合用药在急诊科缓解肌肉骨骼疼痛的随机对照试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Sep;31(9):1357-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.06.007. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
4
Efficacy of ibuprofen in musculoskeletal post-traumatic pain in children: A systematic review.布洛芬治疗儿童创伤后肌肉骨骼疼痛的疗效:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 3;15(12):e0243314. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243314. eCollection 2020.
5
Oral Analgesics Utilization for Children With Musculoskeletal Injury (OUCH Trial): An RCT.儿童肌肉骨骼损伤口服镇痛药的应用(OUCH试验):一项随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2017 Nov;140(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0186. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
6
A randomized, controlled trial of acetaminophen, ibuprofen, and codeine for acute pain relief in children with musculoskeletal trauma.对乙酰氨基酚、布洛芬和可待因用于缓解儿童肌肉骨骼创伤急性疼痛的随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2007 Mar;119(3):460-7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2006-1347.
7
The PICHFORK (Pain InCHildren Fentanyl OR Ketamine) trial comparing the efficacy of intranasal ketamine and fentanyl in the relief of moderate to severe pain in children with limb injuries: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.PICHFORK(儿童疼痛使用芬太尼或氯胺酮)试验:比较鼻内氯胺酮和芬太尼缓解肢体受伤儿童中重度疼痛的疗效——一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2013 Jul 10;14:208. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-208.
8
Ibuprofen provides analgesia equivalent to acetaminophen-codeine in the treatment of acute pain in children with extremity injuries: a randomized clinical trial.布洛芬在治疗四肢受伤儿童的急性疼痛方面提供了与对乙酰氨基酚-可待因相当的镇痛效果:一项随机临床试验。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Aug;16(8):711-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00471.x. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
9
A sequential, multiple-assignment, randomized trial of analgesic strategies for acute musculoskeletal Pain.急性肌肉骨骼疼痛的镇痛策略序贯、多次分配、随机试验。
Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;82:15-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.05.005. Epub 2024 May 9.
10
Efficacy of an ibuprofen/codeine combination for pain management in children presenting to the emergency department with a limb injury: a pilot study.布洛芬/可待因组合用于急诊科肢体受伤儿童疼痛管理的疗效:一项试点研究。
J Emerg Med. 2013 Feb;44(2):536-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2012.06.027. Epub 2012 Dec 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Analgesia and Sedation of Pediatric Patients with Major Trauma in Pre-Hospital and Emergency Department Settings-A Narrative Review.院前及急诊科环境下重大创伤儿科患者的镇痛与镇静——一项叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 12;12(16):5260. doi: 10.3390/jcm12165260.
2
Operationalization of assent for research participation in pre-adolescent children: a scoping review.研究参与同意在未成年前儿童中的操作化:范围综述。
BMC Med Ethics. 2022 Nov 3;23(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12910-022-00844-2.
3
Intravenous ketorolac versus morphine in children presenting with suspected appendicitis: a pilot single-centre non-inferiority randomised controlled trial.

本文引用的文献

1
A two-centre survey of caregiver perspectives on opioid use for children's acute pain management.一项关于照顾者对儿童急性疼痛管理中使用阿片类药物观点的双中心调查。
Paediatr Child Health. 2019 Dec 30;26(1):19-26. doi: 10.1093/pch/pxz162. eCollection 2021 Feb.
2
Comparison of the psychometric properties of 3 pain scales used in the pediatric emergency department: Visual Analogue Scale, Faces Pain Scale-Revised, and Colour Analogue Scale.三种用于儿科急诊的疼痛量表的心理测量学特性比较:视觉模拟评分法、面部疼痛评分修订版和颜色模拟评分法。
Pain. 2018 Aug;159(8):1508-1517. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001236.
3
Validity and Reliability of the Verbal Numerical Rating Scale for Children Aged 4 to 17 Years With Acute Pain.
静脉注射酮咯酸与吗啡在疑似阑尾炎患儿中的应用比较:一项单中心非劣效性随机对照试验。
BMJ Open. 2022 Apr 5;12(4):e056499. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056499.
4
A novel preference-informed complementary trial (PICT) design for clinical trial research influenced by strong patient preferences.一种受强烈患者偏好影响的用于临床试验研究的新型偏好知情补充试验(PICT)设计。
Trials. 2021 Mar 12;22(1):206. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05164-1.
5
Non-steroidal or opioid analgesia use for children with musculoskeletal injuries (the No OUCH study): statistical analysis plan.非甾体类或阿片类镇痛药用于肌肉骨骼损伤儿童(“无疼痛”研究):统计分析计划
Trials. 2020 Sep 3;21(1):759. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04503-y.
4 至 17 岁急性疼痛儿童使用言语数字评分量表的有效性和可靠性。
Ann Emerg Med. 2018 Jun;71(6):691-702.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.09.009. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
4
Oral Analgesics Utilization for Children With Musculoskeletal Injury (OUCH Trial): An RCT.儿童肌肉骨骼损伤口服镇痛药的应用(OUCH试验):一项随机对照试验。
Pediatrics. 2017 Nov;140(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-0186. Epub 2017 Oct 11.
5
Oral morphine versus ibuprofen administered at home for postoperative orthopedic pain in children: a randomized controlled trial.口服吗啡与布洛芬在家用于儿童骨科术后疼痛的比较:一项随机对照试验。
CMAJ. 2017 Oct 10;189(40):E1252-E1258. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.170017.
6
How Safe Are Common Analgesics for the Treatment of Acute Pain for Children? A Systematic Review.常用镇痛药治疗儿童急性疼痛有多安全?一项系统评价。
Pain Res Manag. 2016;2016:5346819. doi: 10.1155/2016/5346819. Epub 2016 Dec 18.
7
Codeine: Time to Say "No".可待因:是时候说“不”了。
Pediatrics. 2016 Oct;138(4). doi: 10.1542/peds.2016-2396. Epub 2016 Sep 19.
8
Psychometric Properties of the Numerical Rating Scale to Assess Self-Reported Pain Intensity in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review.用于评估儿童和青少年自我报告疼痛强度的数字评分量表的心理测量特性:一项系统综述。
Clin J Pain. 2017 Apr;33(4):376-383. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000406.
9
Pain Management of Pediatric Musculoskeletal Injury in the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review.急诊科小儿肌肉骨骼损伤的疼痛管理:一项系统评价
Pain Res Manag. 2016;2016:4809394. doi: 10.1155/2016/4809394. Epub 2016 Apr 11.
10
Parents' preferences on pain treatment, even when faced with medication dilemmas, influence their decisions to administer opioids in children.即使面对用药困境,父母对疼痛治疗的偏好仍会影响他们给孩子使用阿片类药物的决定。
Evid Based Nurs. 2016 Apr;19(2):51-2. doi: 10.1136/eb-2015-102164. Epub 2015 Nov 25.