Suppr超能文献

急性护理中基于证据的实践实施的单位领导和氛围:一项横断面描述性研究。

Unit Leadership and Climates for Evidence-Based Practice Implementation in Acute Care: A Cross-Sectional Descriptive Study.

机构信息

Rho, Assistant Professor, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Rho, Research Assistant and DNP Student, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

J Nurs Scholarsh. 2019 Jan;51(1):114-124. doi: 10.1111/jnu.12452. Epub 2018 Dec 15.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The purposes of this study were to (a) describe nurse manager (NM) leadership behaviors for evidence-based practice, NM evidence-based practice competencies, and unit climates for evidence-based practice implementation in acute care, and (b) test for differences in NMs' and staff nurses' (RNs') perceptions.

DESIGN

A multisite cross-sectional design was used to collect data from a sample of 24 NMs and 553 RNs from 24 adult medical-surgical units in seven U.S. community hospitals.

METHODS

Responses were collected using electronic questionnaires, inclusive of the Nurse Manager Evidence-Based Practice Competency Scale (NM only), Implementation Leadership Scale, and Implementation Climate Scale. E-mail reminders and gift card lottery drawings encouraged response. Descriptive statistics described total and subscale scores by role. Differences in perceptions were evaluated using independent t-tests with Bonferroni correction (α = .05).

FINDINGS

23 NMs and 287 RNs responded (95.8% and 51.9% response rates, respectively). NMs reported they were "somewhat competent" in evidence-based practice (M = 1.62 [SD = 0.5]; 0-3 scale). NMs and RNs perceived leadership behaviors (NM: M = 2.73 [SD = 0.46]; RN: M = 2.88 [SD = 0.78]; 0-4 scale) and unit climates for evidence-based practice implementation (NM: M = 2.16 [SD = 0.67]; RN: M = 2.24 [SD = 0.74]; 0-4 scale) as evident to a "moderate extent." RN and NM perceptions differed significantly on the Proactive (p = .01) and Knowledgeable (p < .001) leadership subscales.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based practice competencies and leadership behaviors of NMs, and unit climates for evidence-based practice were modest at best and interventions are needed. To close the research to practice gap, future studies should investigate the interplay between social dynamic context factors and implementation strategies to promote uptake of evidence-based practices.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Critical attention is needed to build organizational capacity for evidence-based practices through development of unit leadership and climate for evidence-based practice to accelerate routine use of evidence-based practices for improving care delivery and patient outcomes. The three instruments described herein provide a foundation for nurse leaders to assess these dynamic context factors and design interventions or programs where there is opportunity for improvement.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在:(a)描述在急症护理中,护士长(NM)在循证实践方面的领导行为、NM 在循证实践方面的能力以及循证实践实施的单位氛围;(b)检验 NM 和注册护士(RN)感知之间的差异。

设计

采用多地点横断面设计,从美国 7 家社区医院的 24 个成人内科外科单位的 24 名 NM 和 553 名 RN 中收集数据。

方法

使用电子问卷收集反应,包括护士长循证实践能力量表(仅 NM)、实施领导量表和实施氛围量表。通过电子邮件提醒和礼品卡抽奖鼓励回复。描述性统计描述了按角色的总分和分量表得分。使用独立 t 检验(Bonferroni 校正,α =.05)评估感知差异。

结果

23 名 NM 和 287 名 RN 做出了回应(分别为 95.8%和 51.9%的回复率)。NM 报告说他们在循证实践方面“有一定能力”(M = 1.62 [SD = 0.5];0-3 分制)。NM 和 RN 感知领导行为(NM:M = 2.73 [SD = 0.46];RN:M = 2.88 [SD = 0.78];0-4 分制)和循证实践实施的单位氛围(NM:M = 2.16 [SD = 0.67];RN:M = 2.24 [SD = 0.74];0-4 分制)“相当明显”。RN 和 NM 的感知在主动(p =.01)和知识(p <.001)领导分量表上存在显著差异。

结论

NM 的循证实践能力和领导行为以及循证实践的单位氛围充其量只是中等水平,需要采取干预措施。为了缩小研究与实践之间的差距,未来的研究应该调查社会动态背景因素和实施策略之间的相互作用,以促进证据实践的采用。

临床相关性

需要通过培养单位循证实践领导能力和氛围来提高循证实践的组织能力,以加速常规使用循证实践,改善护理提供和患者结局。本文所述的三个工具为护理领导者评估这些动态背景因素和设计干预措施或计划提供了基础,以提供改进机会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验