Dietz Nicholas, Sharma Mayur, Alhourani Ahmad, Ugiliweneza Beatrice, Wang Dengzhi, Nuño Miriam A, Drazin Doniel, Boakye Maxwell
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.
Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.
World Neurosurg. 2019 Mar;123:177-183. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
Bundled payments offer a lump sum for management of particular conditions over a specified period that has the potential to reduce health care payments. In addition, bundled payments represent a shift toward patient-centered reimbursement, which has the upside of improved care coordination among providers and may lead to improved outcomes.
To review the challenges and sources of payment variation and opportunities for restructuring bundled payments plans in the context of spine surgery.
We reviewed episodes of care over the past 10 years. We completed a search using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and the PICOS (Participants, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design) model in PubMed and Ovid databases to identify studies that met our search criteria.
Ten studies met the search criteria, which were retrospective in design. The primary recipient of reimbursement was the hospital associated with the index procedure (59.7%-77% of the bundled payment), followed by surgeon reimbursement (12.8%-14%) and post-acute care rehabilitation (3.6%-7.3%). On average, the index hospitalization was $32,467, ranging from $11,880 to $107,642, depending on number of levels fused, complications, and malignancy. Readmission was shown to increase the 90-day payment by 50%-200% for uncomplicated fusion.
The implementation of spine surgery in bundled payment models offers opportunity for health care cost reduction. Patient heterogeneity, complications, and index hospitalization pricing are among factors that contribute to the challenge of payment variation. Development of standard care pathways, multidisciplinary coordination between inpatient and outpatient postoperative care, and empowerment of patients are also key elements of progress in the evolution of bundled payments in spine surgery. We anticipate more individualized risk-adjusted prediction models of payment for spine surgery, contributing to more manageable variation in payment and favorable models of bundled payments for payers and providers.
捆绑支付针对特定病情在规定时期内提供一笔总额付款,这有可能减少医疗保健费用支出。此外,捆绑支付代表着向以患者为中心的报销方式转变,其好处是改善了医疗服务提供者之间的协调,可能会带来更好的治疗效果。
在脊柱手术背景下,回顾支付差异的挑战、来源以及重组捆绑支付计划的机会。
我们回顾了过去10年的护理事件。我们按照PRISMA(系统评价与Meta分析优先报告条目)指南以及PICOS(参与者、干预措施、对照、结局、研究设计)模型在PubMed和Ovid数据库中进行检索,以识别符合我们检索标准的研究。
10项研究符合检索标准,均为回顾性设计。报销的主要接受者是与初次手术相关的医院(占捆绑支付的59.7%-77%),其次是外科医生报销(12.8%-14%)和急性后期护理康复报销(3.6%-7.3%)。平均而言,初次住院费用为32467美元,根据融合节段数量、并发症和恶性肿瘤情况,费用范围在11880美元至107642美元之间。对于无并发症的融合手术,再次入院显示会使90天支付费用增加50%-200%。
在捆绑支付模式下实施脊柱手术为降低医疗保健成本提供了机会。患者异质性、并发症和初次住院定价是导致支付差异挑战的因素。制定标准护理路径、住院和术后门诊护理之间的多学科协调以及患者赋权也是脊柱手术捆绑支付发展进程中的关键要素。我们预计会出现更个性化的脊柱手术支付风险调整预测模型,有助于使支付差异更易于管理,并为支付方和医疗服务提供者带来有利的捆绑支付模式。