Scarlata Simone, Mancini Damiana, Laudisio Alice, Raffaele Antonelli Incalzi
Geriatrics, Unit of Respiratory Pathophysiology and Thoracic Endoscopy, Campus Bio Medico University and Teaching Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Geriatrics, Unit of Respiratory Pathophysiology and Thoracic Endoscopy, Campus Bio Medico University and Teaching Hospital, Rome, Italy.
Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2019 Feb;260:58-62. doi: 10.1016/j.resp.2018.12.004. Epub 2018 Dec 13.
We aimed at testing M-mode ultrasound diaphragmatic thickness reproducibility and its clinical correlates in healthy volunteers. Sixty-six consecutive healthy volunteers were considered eligible, and enrolled in the study. During a single visit, all participants received three M-mode and B-mode ultrasound evaluations of Diaphragmatic Thickness (DT). We then proceeded to calculate the thickness difference and assess the association of ultrasonographic measurements with demographic and anthropometric data. Variables associated through univariate analyses were entered in multivariable models, and Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was performed in order to determine intra- and inter-observer reproducibility. Intra- and inter-observer agreements showed to be excellent through Cronbach's Alpha, ranging from 0.81 - 0.91 and 0.86 - 0.92, respectively. Mean diaphragmatic thickness measurements were: 2.6 (±0.5) mm at inhalation and 1.8 (±0.4) mm at exhalation. The results we obtained significantly varied according to gender, showing diaphragmatic motion, inspiratory/expiratory thickness and fractional thickening to be significantly lower in women. Moreover, a significantly reduced expiratory diaphragmatic thickness emerged in the subgroup of subjects having a sedentary work (p = 0.045). The crude association between expiratory thickness and active work produced a B coefficient of 0.19 (95% CI: 0.04-0.38; p = 0.045), which was confirmed after adjustments considering age and sex (B = 0.20; 95% CI: 0.01- 0.39; P = 0.037). Diaphragmatic thickness measurements using M-mode are reproducible. Intra and inter-observer agreement is high enough to support the precision of this measurement and provide a further analytic tool for a wider application in clinical practice.
我们旨在测试M型超声测量健康志愿者膈肌厚度的可重复性及其临床相关性。连续66名健康志愿者被认为符合条件并纳入研究。在单次就诊期间,所有参与者均接受了三次膈肌厚度(DT)的M型和B型超声评估。然后我们计算厚度差异,并评估超声测量值与人口统计学和人体测量学数据之间的关联。通过单变量分析相关的变量被纳入多变量模型,并进行组内相关系数(ICC)分析以确定观察者内和观察者间的可重复性。通过Cronbach's Alpha分析显示观察者内和观察者间的一致性非常好,分别为0.81 - 0.91和0.86 - 0.92。平均膈肌厚度测量值为:吸气时2.6(±0.5)mm,呼气时1.8(±0.4)mm。我们获得的结果根据性别有显著差异,女性的膈肌运动、吸气/呼气厚度和增厚分数明显更低。此外,久坐工作的受试者亚组中呼气时膈肌厚度显著降低(p = 0.045)。呼气厚度与积极工作之间的粗略关联产生的B系数为0.19(95%CI:0.04 - 0.38;p = 0.045),在考虑年龄和性别进行调整后得到证实(B = 0.20;95%CI:0.01 - 0.39;P = 0.037)。使用M型超声测量膈肌厚度具有可重复性。观察者内和观察者间的一致性足够高,以支持该测量的精度,并为在临床实践中的更广泛应用提供进一步的分析工具。