Suppr超能文献

儿童颅骨切除术后的颅骨成形术——一项多中心回顾性队列研究

Cranioplasties following craniectomies in children-a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Klieverik Vita M, Miller Kai J, Han Kuo Sen, Singhal Ash, Vassilyadi Michael, Touchette Charles J, Weil Alexander G, Woerdeman Peter A

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Division of Neuroscience, Brain Center Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, room G03.124, 3484 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery, British Columbia Children's Hospital, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.

出版信息

Childs Nerv Syst. 2019 Sep;35(9):1473-1480. doi: 10.1007/s00381-018-4024-2. Epub 2018 Dec 15.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Complications following pediatric cranioplasty after craniectomy with either autologous bone flaps or cranial implants are reported to be common, particularly bone flap resorption. However, only sparse data are available regarding cranioplasty strategies, complications, and outcomes. This manuscript describes a Canadian-Dutch multicenter pediatric cohort study with autografts and cranial implant cranioplasties following craniectomies for a variety of indications.

METHODS

The study included all children (< 18 years) who underwent craniectomy and subsequent cranioplasty surgeries from 2008 to 2014 (with a minimum of 1-year follow-up) at four academic hospitals with a dedicated pediatric neurosurgical service. Data were collected regarding initial diagnosis, age, time interval between craniectomy and cranioplasty, bone flap storage method, type of cranioplasty for initial procedure (and redo if applicable), and the postoperative outcome including surgical site infection, wound breakdowns, bone flap resorption, and inadequate fit/disfigurement.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients (46 males, average age 9.7 ± 5.5 years) were eligible for inclusion, with mean follow-up of 82.3 ± 31.2 months after craniectomy. Forty cranioplasties (62.5%) used autologous bone re-implant, 23 (57.5%) of which showed resorption. On average, resorption was documented at 434 days (range 62-2796 days) after reimplantation. In 20 cases, a revision cranioplasty was needed. In 24 of the post-craniectomy cases (37.5%), a cranial implant was used with one of ten different implant types. Implant loosening prompted a complete revision cranioplasty in 2 cases (8.3%). Cranial implants were associated with low morbidity and lower reoperation dates compared to the autologous cranioplasties.

CONCLUSION

The most prominent finding in this multicenter cohort study was that bone flap resorption in children remains a common and widespread problem following craniectomy. Cranioplasty strategies varied between centers and evolved over time within centers. Cranial implants were associated with low morbidity and low reoperation rates. Still, longer term and prospective multicenter cohort studies are needed to optimize cranioplasty strategies in children after craniectomies.

摘要

目的

据报道,小儿颅骨切除术后采用自体骨瓣或颅骨植入物进行颅骨修补术的并发症很常见,尤其是骨瓣吸收。然而,关于颅骨修补术的策略、并发症和结果的可用数据很少。本文描述了一项加拿大 - 荷兰多中心小儿队列研究,该研究涉及因各种适应症进行颅骨切除术后采用自体移植和颅骨植入物进行颅骨修补的情况。

方法

该研究纳入了2008年至2014年期间在四家设有专门小儿神经外科服务的学术医院接受颅骨切除术及后续颅骨修补手术的所有儿童(<18岁)(至少随访1年)。收集了有关初始诊断、年龄、颅骨切除与颅骨修补之间的时间间隔、骨瓣储存方法、初始手术(如适用,再次手术)的颅骨修补类型以及术后结果的数据,包括手术部位感染、伤口裂开、骨瓣吸收和贴合不良/畸形。

结果

64例患者(46例男性,平均年龄9.7±5.5岁)符合纳入标准,颅骨切除术后平均随访82.3±31.2个月。40例颅骨修补术(62.5%)采用自体骨重新植入,其中23例(57.5%)出现吸收。平均而言,重新植入后434天(范围62 - 2796天)记录到吸收情况。20例患者需要进行翻修颅骨修补术。在24例颅骨切除术后病例(37.5%)中,使用了十种不同植入物类型之一的颅骨植入物。2例(8.3%)因植入物松动促使进行了完全翻修颅骨修补术。与自体颅骨修补术相比,颅骨植入物的发病率较低且再次手术时间较晚。

结论

这项多中心队列研究中最突出的发现是,小儿颅骨切除术后骨瓣吸收仍然是一个常见且普遍存在的问题。颅骨修补策略在不同中心之间存在差异,并且在各中心内部也随时间演变。颅骨植入物的发病率较低且再次手术率较低。尽管如此,仍需要进行长期的前瞻性多中心队列研究,以优化小儿颅骨切除术后的颅骨修补策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验