Aleksandrova Lily R, Wang Yu Tian, Phillips Anthony G
Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Chronic Stress (Thousand Oaks). 2017 Jan-Dec;1. doi: 10.1177/2470547017743511. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
The prevailing hypothesis of ketamine's unique antidepressant effects implicates N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor (NMDAR) inhibition-dependent enhancement of α-amino-3-hydroxy-5-methyl-4-isoxazolepropionic acid receptor-mediated transmission, activation of intracellular signalling pathways and increased synaptogenesis. Recently, however, a seminal study by Zanos et al. directly challenged the NMDAR hypothesis of ketamine with the claim that an active ketamine metabolite, (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine, devoid of NMDAR binding properties or key side effects of its parent compound, is both necessary and sufficient for ketamine's antidepressant effects in rodents. However, following these encouraging initial findings, one preclin-ical study failed to replicate the antidepressant effects of (2R,6R)-hydroxynorketamine (HNK), while others have questioned the metabolite's contribution to ketamine's therapeutic effects or argued against rejecting the NMDAR hypothesis of ketamine action. In light of these potentially paradigm-shifting, but highly controversial, findings, this review will summarise and critically evaluate the evidence for and against the NMDA receptor hypothesis of ketamine action, with a particular focus on (2R,6R)-HNK and the implications of its discovery for understanding ketamine's mechanism of action in depression. Ultimately, uncovering the molecular mechanisms underlying the therapeutic effects of ketamine and possibly (2R,6R)-HNK, will aid the development of novel and more efficacious antidepressant agents so urgently needed to address a major public health concern, and could hold potential for the treatment of other stress-related psychopathologies, including bipolar disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder and suicidality.
关于氯胺酮独特抗抑郁作用的主流假说是,其通过抑制N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸受体(NMDAR),增强α-氨基-3-羟基-5-甲基-4-异恶唑丙酸受体介导的神经传递,激活细胞内信号通路并增加突触形成。然而,最近扎诺斯等人的一项开创性研究直接对氯胺酮的NMDAR假说提出了挑战,他们声称一种活性氯胺酮代谢物(2R,6R)-羟基去甲氯胺酮,既没有NMDAR结合特性,也没有其母体化合物的关键副作用,对于氯胺酮在啮齿动物中的抗抑郁作用而言,它既是必要的也是充分的。然而,在这些令人鼓舞的初步发现之后,一项临床前研究未能重现(2R,6R)-羟基去甲氯胺酮(HNK)的抗抑郁作用,而其他一些研究则质疑该代谢物对氯胺酮治疗效果的贡献,或者反对摒弃氯胺酮作用的NMDAR假说。鉴于这些可能会改变范式但极具争议的发现,本综述将总结并批判性地评估支持和反对氯胺酮作用的NMDA受体假说的证据,特别关注(2R,6R)-HNK及其发现对于理解氯胺酮在抑郁症中的作用机制的影响。最终,揭示氯胺酮以及可能还有(2R,6R)-HNK治疗作用背后的分子机制,将有助于开发急需的新型且更有效的抗抑郁药物,以解决一个重大的公共卫生问题,并且可能对治疗其他与应激相关的精神病理学疾病具有潜力,包括双相情感障碍、创伤后应激障碍和自杀倾向。