• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

2007 年至 2017 年新加坡一家三级转诊中心的 2 型糖尿病患者的药物利用、血糖控制和结局趋势。

Trends in medication utilization, glycemic control and outcomes among type 2 diabetes patients in a tertiary referral center in Singapore from 2007 to 2017.

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

Department of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.

出版信息

J Diabetes. 2019 Jul;11(7):573-581. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12886. Epub 2019 Jan 24.

DOI:10.1111/1753-0407.12886
PMID:30556375
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of glucose-lowering agents is a cornerstone in combating type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Treatment guidelines have changed significantly over the past decade. We report temporal trends in medication utilization, glycemic control and rate of severe hypoglycemia in T2DM patients at a tertiary referral center in Singapore.

METHODS

We analyzed data of 36 924 T2DM patients seen at Singapore General Hospital from 2007 to 2017. Annual age-, sex- and racially-standardized proportions of patients (a) prescribed with each class of glucose-lowering agent, (b) on various glucose-lowering regimens, and (c) had an HbA of less than 6%, 6% to less than 7%, 7% to less than 8%, 8% to less than 9%, or 9% or more were estimated using logistic regression. Poisson regression was used to estimate standardized rate of severe hypoglycemia.

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2017, use of metformin (45.9% to 59.6%) and insulin (24.4% to 57.9%) increased, while utilization of sulfonylureas (52.0% to 44.9%) decreased (all P < 0.001). Utilization of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (1.2% to 31.2%) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (0.5% to 7.4%) increased from 2008 to 2017 and 2012 to 2017, respectively (all P < 0.001). More patients were prescribed a combination of insulin and oral agents (17.3% to 46.0%, P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with HbA of 8% or more increased (33.7% to 36.0%, P < 0.001). Rates of severe hypoglycemia (5.0 to 8.4 per 100 patient-years, P < 0.001) also rose.

CONCLUSION

Medication utilization patterns have changed significantly over the past 11 years with a shift towards newer agents. Glycemic control has remained stable, and rate of severe hypoglycemia increased. Further analysis is required before causal relationships can be inferred.

摘要

背景

降低血糖药物的使用是治疗 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)的基石。在过去的十年中,治疗指南发生了重大变化。我们报告了在新加坡的一家三级转诊中心的 T2DM 患者的药物使用、血糖控制和严重低血糖发生率的时间趋势。

方法

我们分析了 2007 年至 2017 年在新加坡总医院就诊的 36924 例 T2DM 患者的数据。使用逻辑回归估计(a)每类降糖药物处方患者的比例、(b)各种降糖方案的患者比例和(c)糖化血红蛋白(HbA)低于 6%、6%至小于 7%、7%至小于 8%、8%至小于 9%或 9%或更高的患者比例。使用泊松回归估计严重低血糖的标准化发生率。

结果

从 2007 年到 2017 年,二甲双胍(45.9%至 59.6%)和胰岛素(24.4%至 57.9%)的使用率增加,而磺酰脲类药物(52.0%至 44.9%)的使用率下降(均 P<0.001)。二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂(1.2%至 31.2%)和钠-葡萄糖协同转运蛋白-2 抑制剂(0.5%至 7.4%)的使用率从 2008 年到 2017 年和 2012 年到 2017 年分别增加(均 P<0.001)。更多的患者同时服用胰岛素和口服药物(17.3%至 46.0%,P<0.001)。HbA 为 8%或更高的患者比例增加(33.7%至 36.0%,P<0.001)。严重低血糖的发生率(5.0 至 8.4 例/100 患者年,P<0.001)也有所上升。

结论

在过去的 11 年中,药物使用模式发生了重大变化,新的药物使用比例增加。血糖控制保持稳定,严重低血糖发生率增加。在得出因果关系之前,需要进一步分析。

相似文献

1
Trends in medication utilization, glycemic control and outcomes among type 2 diabetes patients in a tertiary referral center in Singapore from 2007 to 2017.2007 年至 2017 年新加坡一家三级转诊中心的 2 型糖尿病患者的药物利用、血糖控制和结局趋势。
J Diabetes. 2019 Jul;11(7):573-581. doi: 10.1111/1753-0407.12886. Epub 2019 Jan 24.
2
Trends in Drug Utilization, Glycemic Control, and Rates of Severe Hypoglycemia, 2006-2013.2006 - 2013年药物使用、血糖控制及严重低血糖发生率的趋势
Diabetes Care. 2017 Apr;40(4):468-475. doi: 10.2337/dc16-0985. Epub 2016 Sep 22.
3
Treatment patterns among older patients with type 2 diabetes in the United States: a retrospective cohort study.美国老年 2 型糖尿病患者的治疗模式:一项回顾性队列研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014 Dec;16(12):833-9. doi: 10.1089/dia.2014.0039. Epub 2014 Jul 28.
4
Relationships between time in range, glycemic variability including hypoglycemia and types of diabetes therapy in Japanese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: Hyogo Diabetes Hypoglycemia Cognition Complications study.日本 2 型糖尿病患者的达标时间、血糖变异性(包括低血糖)与糖尿病治疗类型之间的关系:兵库糖尿病认知并发症研究。
J Diabetes Investig. 2021 Feb;12(2):244-253. doi: 10.1111/jdi.13336. Epub 2020 Aug 2.
5
Efficacy and safety of linagliptin in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus and poor glycemic control: pooled analysis of data from three placebo-controlled phase III trials.在血糖控制不佳的 2 型糖尿病患者中,利拉利汀的疗效和安全性:来自三项安慰剂对照 III 期临床试验数据的汇总分析。
J Diabetes Complications. 2013 May-Jun;27(3):274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2012.11.008. Epub 2013 Feb 9.
6
Trends in Glucose-Lowering Drug Use, Glycemic Control, and Severe Hypoglycemia in Adults With Diabetes in Hong Kong, 2002-2016.2002 - 2016年香港糖尿病成年人降糖药物使用、血糖控制及严重低血糖的趋势
Diabetes Care. 2020 Dec;43(12):2967-2974. doi: 10.2337/dc20-0260. Epub 2020 Oct 12.
7
Combination therapy with insulin glargine plus metformin but not insulin glargine plus sulfonylurea provides similar glycemic control to triple oral combination therapy in patients with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled with dual oral agent therapy.对于使用两种口服药物治疗血糖仍未得到控制的2型糖尿病患者,甘精胰岛素联合二甲双胍治疗而非甘精胰岛素联合磺脲类药物治疗能提供与三联口服联合治疗相似的血糖控制效果。
J Diabetes Complications. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(8):1266-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.05.022. Epub 2015 Jun 5.
8
Prevalence of hypoglycemia among a sample of sulfonylurea-treated patients with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in Argentina: The real-life effectiveness and care patterns of diabetes management (RECAP-DM) study.阿根廷磺脲类药物治疗的2型糖尿病患者样本中低血糖的患病率:糖尿病管理的真实疗效和护理模式(RECAP-DM)研究
Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2018 Dec;65(10):592-602. doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2018.05.014. Epub 2018 Jul 31.
9
Efficacy and safety of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors versus dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors as monotherapy or add-on to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A systematic review and meta-analysis.钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂与二肽基肽酶-4 抑制剂单用或与二甲双胍联用治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的疗效和安全性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Jan;20(1):113-120. doi: 10.1111/dom.13047. Epub 2017 Aug 10.
10
Descriptive Analysis of Long- and Intermediate-Acting Insulin and Key Safety Outcomes in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.描述性分析长效和中效胰岛素在 2 型糖尿病成人患者中的应用及关键安全性结局。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2019 Nov;25(11):1162-1171. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2019.19042. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Metformin for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes in Asian Adults: A Systematic Review.二甲双胍用于治疗亚洲成年人2型糖尿病:一项系统评价
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2025 Mar 26;18:873-904. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S479889. eCollection 2025.
2
Association of Metformin Use with Iron Deficiency Anemia in Urban Chinese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.二甲双胍的使用与城市中国 2 型糖尿病患者缺铁性贫血的关系。
Nutrients. 2023 Jul 8;15(14):3081. doi: 10.3390/nu15143081.
3
A 5-year trend in the use of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors and other oral antidiabetic drugs in a Middle Eastern country.
一个中东国家钠-葡萄糖共转运蛋白 2 抑制剂和其他口服抗糖尿病药物使用的 5 年趋势。
Int J Clin Pharm. 2022 Dec;44(6):1342-1350. doi: 10.1007/s11096-022-01464-x. Epub 2022 Sep 28.
4
Glucose-lowering drug use, glycemic outcomes, and severe hypoglycemia: 18-Year trends in 0·9 million adults with Diabetes in Hong Kong (2002-2019).降糖药物使用、血糖结果及严重低血糖:香港90万糖尿病成年人的18年趋势(2002 - 2019年)
Lancet Reg Health West Pac. 2022 Jun 24;26:100509. doi: 10.1016/j.lanwpc.2022.100509. eCollection 2022 Sep.
5
Trends in glycemic control in patients with insulin therapy compared with non-insulin or no drugs in type 2 diabetes in Japan: a long-term view of real-world treatment between 2002 and 2018 (JDDM 66).在日本,与非胰岛素或无药物治疗相比,接受胰岛素治疗的 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖控制趋势:2002 年至 2018 年真实世界治疗的长期观察(JDDM 66)。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2022 May;10(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002727.
6
Trends in cardiovascular risk factors and treatment goals in patients with diabetes in Singapore-analysis of the SingHealth Diabetes Registry.新加坡糖尿病患者心血管风险因素和治疗目标的趋势分析——基于 SingHealth 糖尿病注册研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Nov 8;16(11):e0259157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259157. eCollection 2021.
7
Cost-Effectiveness of Gliclazide-Based Intensive Glucose Control vs. Standard Glucose Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. An Economic Analysis of the ADVANCE Trial in Vietnam.格列齐特强化血糖控制与 2 型糖尿病标准血糖控制的成本效益比较。越南 ADVANCE 试验的经济学分析。
Front Public Health. 2020 Oct 30;8:562023. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.562023. eCollection 2020.