Combination of free-breathing radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient-echo sequence with diffusion weighted images: Potential for differentiating malignant from benign peripheral solid pulmonary masses.

OBJECTIVES

High resolution CT is the most commonly used radiological method for differentiating benign from malignant peripheral solid pulmonary masses, however, some of them are not easily diagnosed by morphology alone. Furthermore, due to the radiation dose, it is unsuitable for patients with disorders requiring repeated examinations over prolonged periods. The aims of this study were to evaluate whether a combination of diffusion-weighted images (DWI) and free-breathing radial 3D fat-suppressed T1-weighted gradient echo (radial volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination, radial VIBE) sequence can enable discrimination between benign from malignant peripheral solid pulmonary masses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Both chest CT scan and MR imaging with radial VIBE and DWI were obtained from 47 patients; 30 males and 17 females (mean age 64 years old; age range 48-83 years old). Benign and malignant peripheral solid pulmonary masses were conclusively identified by pathology results. Two radiologists independently reviewed all the images and record radiological features including morphological signs on radial VIBE, CT images, and ADC value. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to analyze the capability of radial VIBE as well as DWI to distinguish malignant from benign peripheral solid pulmonary masses.

RESULTS

In 77% of patients, malignant peripheral solid pulmonary masses were found. Morphological signs of mediastinal lymph node enlargement and lobulation were more easily found in malignant masses in both radial VIBE (mediastinal lymph node enlargement: p = 0.033, lobulation: p = 0.039) and CT (mediastinal lymph node enlargement: p = 0.004, lobulation: p = 0.012). The ADC value were also significant difference between benign and malignant groups (p = 0.001). Combined ADC value with radial VIBE was a most specific test than routine-dose CT (86.1% vs 75%, p < 0.001), but less sensitive than routine-dose CT (81.8% vs 90.9%; p < 0.001) for malignant peripheral solid pulmonary masses detection. Diagnostic accuracy was 89% for combining ADC value with radial VIBE, and 85% for routine-dose CT.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of morphological signs and ADC value seems to improve differentiating malignant from benign peripheral solid pulmonary masses. Especially in patients unable to endure radiation exposure, suspend respiration, radial VIBE provides similar morphological signs displaying to those on routine-dose CT.