Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, 310 Cedar Street, P.O. Box 208023, New Haven, CT, 06520, USA.
Sanofi US Services Inc., Bridgewater Township, USA.
Breast Cancer Res. 2018 Dec 17;20(1):154. doi: 10.1186/s13058-018-1076-x.
The role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in the cancer immune landscape and their potential as treatment targets or modulators of response to treatment are gaining increasing interest. TAMs display high molecular and functional complexity. Therefore their objective assessment as breast cancer biomarkers is critical. The aims of this study were to objectively determine the in situ expression and significance of TAM biomarkers (CD68, CD163, and MMP-9) in breast cancer and to identify subclasses of patients who could benefit from TAM-targeting therapies.
We measured CD68, CD163, and MMP-9 protein expression in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues of breast carcinomas represented in tissue microarray format using multiplexed quantitative immunofluorescence (QIF) in two independent Yale cohorts: cohort A-n = 398, estrogen receptor-positive (ER) and ER cases-and the triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)-only cohort B (n = 160). Associations between macrophage markers, ER status, and survival were assessed. Protein expression measured by QIF was compared with mRNA expression data from the METABRIC study.
All three macrophage markers were co-expressed, displaying higher expression in ER cancers. High pan-macrophage marker CD68 correlated with poorer overall survival (OS) only in ER cases of cohort A (P = 0.02). High expression of CD163 protein in TAMs was associated with improved OS in ER cases (cohort A, P = 0.03 and TNBC cohort B, P = 0.04, respectively) but not in ER cancers. MMP-9 protein was not individually associated with OS. High expression of MMP-9 in the CD68/CD163 TAMs was associated with worse OS in ER tumors (P <0.001) but not in ER cancers. In the METABRIC dataset, mRNA levels followed the co-expression pattern observed in QIF but did not always show the same trend regarding OS.
Macrophage activity markers correlate with survival differently in ER and ER cancers. The association between high co-expression and co-localization of MMP-9/CD163/CD68 and poor survival in ER cancers suggests that these cancers may be candidates for macrophage-targeted therapies.
肿瘤相关巨噬细胞(TAMs)在癌症免疫景观中的作用及其作为治疗靶点或调节治疗反应的潜力正受到越来越多的关注。TAMs 表现出高度的分子和功能复杂性。因此,客观评估它们作为乳腺癌生物标志物至关重要。本研究的目的是客观地确定 TAM 生物标志物(CD68、CD163 和 MMP-9)在乳腺癌中的原位表达及其意义,并确定可能受益于 TAM 靶向治疗的患者亚类。
我们使用多指标定量免疫荧光(QIF)在两个独立的耶鲁队列中测量了乳腺癌组织微阵列中福尔马林固定石蜡包埋组织中 CD68、CD163 和 MMP-9 蛋白的表达:队列 A-n = 398,雌激素受体阳性(ER)和 ER 病例-以及三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)仅队列 B(n = 160)。评估了巨噬细胞标志物与 ER 状态和生存之间的关联。通过 QIF 测量的蛋白表达与 METABRIC 研究的 mRNA 表达数据进行了比较。
所有三种巨噬细胞标志物均共同表达,在 ER 癌中表达更高。全 pan-巨噬细胞标志物 CD68 在队列 A 的 ER 病例中仅与总生存期(OS)较差相关(P = 0.02)。TAMs 中 CD163 蛋白的高表达与 ER 病例的 OS 改善相关(队列 A,P = 0.03 和 TNBC 队列 B,P = 0.04,分别),但在 ER 癌中则不然。MMP-9 蛋白单独与 OS 无关。CD68/CD163 TAMs 中 MMP-9 蛋白的高表达与 ER 肿瘤的 OS 较差相关(P <0.001),但与 ER 癌无关。在 METABRIC 数据集,mRNA 水平遵循 QIF 中观察到的共表达模式,但并不总是显示与 OS 相同的趋势。
在 ER 和 ER 癌症中,巨噬细胞活性标志物的表达与生存的相关性不同。MMP-9/CD163/CD68 高共表达和共定位与 ER 癌症不良生存之间的关联表明,这些癌症可能是巨噬细胞靶向治疗的候选者。