• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Acceptability of Electronic Visits for Return of Research Results in the Mayo Clinic Biobank.梅奥诊所生物样本库中电子访视用于返回研究结果的可接受性
Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2018 Sep 15;2(4):352-358. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.07.004. eCollection 2018 Dec.
2
Early return visits by primary care patients: a retail nurse practitioner clinic versus standard medical office care.初级保健患者的早期复诊:零售护士从业者诊所与标准医疗办公室护理的比较。
Popul Health Manag. 2012 Aug;15(4):216-9. doi: 10.1089/pop.2011.0058. Epub 2012 Mar 12.
3
The Mayo Clinic Biobank: a building block for individualized medicine.梅奥诊所生物样本库:个体化医学的基石。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Sep;88(9):952-62. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.006.
4
Hospitalizations and emergency department use in Mayo Clinic Biobank participants within the employee and community health medical home.梅奥诊所生物样本库参与者在员工和社区健康医疗之家的住院和急诊使用情况。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Sep;88(9):963-9. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.015.
5
Pilot study of providing online care in a primary care setting.在基层医疗环境中开展在线护理的初步研究。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2010 Aug;85(8):704-10. doi: 10.4065/mcp.2010.0145. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
6
Implementation of a new prenatal care model to reduce office visits and increase connectivity and continuity of care: protocol for a mixed-methods study.实施一种新的产前护理模式以减少门诊就诊次数并增强护理的连通性和连续性:一项混合方法研究的方案
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015 Dec 2;15:323. doi: 10.1186/s12884-015-0762-2.
7
Do retail clinics increase early return visits for pediatric patients?零售诊所会增加儿科患者的早期复诊率吗?
J Am Board Fam Med. 2008 Sep-Oct;21(5):475-6. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2008.05.080072.
8
Acceptability of Routine Evaluations Using Patient-Reported Outcomes of Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and Other Patient-Reported Symptom Outcome Tools in Cancer Outpatients: Princess Margaret Cancer Centre Experience.在癌症门诊患者中使用通用不良事件术语标准和其他患者报告症状结局工具进行常规评估的可接受性:玛格丽特公主癌症中心的经验。
Oncologist. 2019 Nov;24(11):e1219-e1227. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0830. Epub 2019 Aug 13.
9
Impact of retail walk-in care on early return visits by adult primary care patients: evaluation via triangulation.零售即时护理对成年初级护理患者早期复诊的影响:通过三角测量法进行评估。
Qual Manag Health Care. 2009 Jan-Mar;18(1):19-24. doi: 10.1097/01.QMH.0000344590.61971.97.
10
Feasibility and acceptability to patients of a longitudinal system for evaluating cancer-related symptoms and quality of life: pilot study of an e/Tablet data-collection system in academic oncology.用于评估癌症相关症状和生活质量的纵向系统对患者的可行性和可接受性:学术肿瘤学中电子/平板电脑数据收集系统的试点研究
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009 Jun;37(6):1027-38. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.07.011. Epub 2009 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Acceptability of Telegenetics for Families with Genetic Eye Diseases.遗传性眼病患者家庭对远程遗传学的接受程度。
Genes (Basel). 2021 Feb 15;12(2):276. doi: 10.3390/genes12020276.
2
Characteristics and utilisation of the Mayo Clinic Biobank, a clinic-based prospective collection in the USA: cohort profile.梅奥诊所生物库的特征和利用,一个基于诊所的美国前瞻性收集:队列特征。
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 6;9(11):e032707. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032707.

本文引用的文献

1
Online genetic counseling from the providers' perspective: counselors' evaluations and a time and cost analysis.从提供者角度看在线遗传咨询:咨询师的评估以及时间和成本分析
Eur J Hum Genet. 2016 Aug;24(9):1255-61. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.283. Epub 2016 Jan 20.
2
Trends in Prescription Drug Use Among Adults in the United States From 1999-2012.1999 - 2012年美国成年人处方药使用趋势
JAMA. 2015 Nov 3;314(17):1818-31. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.13766.
3
Preferences Regarding Return of Genomic Results to Relatives of Research Participants, Including after Participant Death: Empirical Results from a Cancer Biobank.关于向研究参与者亲属反馈基因组结果的偏好,包括参与者死亡后:癌症生物样本库的实证结果
J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Fall;43(3):464-75. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12289.
4
Million Veteran Program: A mega-biobank to study genetic influences on health and disease.百万退伍军人计划:一个大型生物银行,用于研究遗传对健康和疾病的影响。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 Feb;70:214-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.09.016. Epub 2015 Oct 9.
5
The time-consuming demands of the practice of medical genetics in the era of advanced genomic testing.先进基因组检测时代医学遗传学实践中耗时的要求。
Genet Med. 2016 Apr;18(4):372-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.96. Epub 2015 Jul 16.
6
Genotyping Informatics and Quality Control for 100,000 Subjects in the Genetic Epidemiology Research on Adult Health and Aging (GERA) Cohort.成人健康与衰老基因流行病学研究(GERA)队列中10万名受试者的基因分型信息学与质量控制
Genetics. 2015 Aug;200(4):1051-60. doi: 10.1534/genetics.115.178905. Epub 2015 Jun 19.
7
UK biobank: an open access resource for identifying the causes of a wide range of complex diseases of middle and old age.英国生物银行:一个用于识别多种中老年复杂疾病病因的开放获取资源。
PLoS Med. 2015 Mar 31;12(3):e1001779. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001779. eCollection 2015 Mar.
8
Public preferences for the return of research results in genetic research: a conjoint analysis.公众对基因研究中研究结果反馈的偏好:一项联合分析。
Genet Med. 2014 Dec;16(12):932-9. doi: 10.1038/gim.2014.50. Epub 2014 May 22.
9
Preferences for results delivery from exome sequencing/genome sequencing.外显子组测序/基因组测序结果交付的偏好
Genet Med. 2014 Jun;16(6):442-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2013.170. Epub 2013 Dec 5.
10
The Mayo Clinic Biobank: a building block for individualized medicine.梅奥诊所生物样本库:个体化医学的基石。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2013 Sep;88(9):952-62. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.06.006.

梅奥诊所生物样本库中电子访视用于返回研究结果的可接受性

Acceptability of Electronic Visits for Return of Research Results in the Mayo Clinic Biobank.

作者信息

Olson Janet E, Ryu Euijung, Lyke Kelly J, Bielinski Suzette J, Winkler Erin M, Hathcock Matthew A, Bublitz Joshua T, Takahashi Paul Y, Cerhan James R

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Epidemiology, Rochester, MN.

Department of Health Sciences Research, Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Rochester, MN.

出版信息

Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. 2018 Sep 15;2(4):352-358. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.07.004. eCollection 2018 Dec.

DOI:10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2018.07.004
PMID:30560237
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6257882/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To understand patient characteristics related to acceptability of returning individual research results via various modalities, focusing on electronic visits (e-visits).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Twelve hundred participants from the Mayo Clinic Biobank were selected using a stratified random sampling approach based on sex, age, and education level. Mailed surveys ascertained return of results preferences for 2 disease vignettes (cystic fibrosis and hereditary breast cancer) and a pharmacogenomics vignette. The study was conducted from October 1, 2013, through March 31, 2014.

RESULTS

In all, 685 patients (57%) responded, and 60% reported liking e-visits, although the option of receiving results in an office visit was liked most frequently. Multivariable logistic models showed that the odds of liking the use of e-visits for returning results for cystic fibrosis and hereditary breast cancer were higher among those with higher education and better genetic knowledge and among those not living in proximity to the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, Minnesota). Level of genetic knowledge was not considerably associated with accepting e-visits, whereas education level remained important. For all vignettes, those who are divorced were less likely to accept e-visits.

CONCLUSION

Researchers are faced with a difficult challenge of returning results with a method that is both acceptable to recipients and logistically feasible. This study implies that the use of e-visits may be a viable option for return of results to stratify the chasm between in-person genetic counseling and online portal receipt of results.

摘要

目的

了解与通过各种方式返回个体研究结果的可接受性相关的患者特征,重点关注电子就诊(e-就诊)。

患者与方法

采用基于性别、年龄和教育水平的分层随机抽样方法,从梅奥诊所生物样本库中选取了1200名参与者。通过邮寄调查问卷确定了对2种疾病案例(囊性纤维化和遗传性乳腺癌)以及1种药物基因组学案例的结果返回偏好。该研究于2013年10月1日至2014年3月31日进行。

结果

共有685名患者(57%)做出回应,60%的患者表示喜欢e-就诊,不过最常被喜欢的结果接收方式是在门诊就诊时接收。多变量逻辑模型显示,在教育程度较高、遗传知识较好以及不住在梅奥诊所附近(明尼苏达州罗切斯特)的人群中,对于囊性纤维化和遗传性乳腺癌,喜欢通过e-就诊返回结果的几率更高。遗传知识水平与接受e-就诊的关联不大,而教育程度仍然很重要。对于所有案例,离婚者接受e-就诊的可能性较小。

结论

研究人员面临着一项艰巨的挑战,即要用一种既为接受者所接受又在后勤方面可行的方法返回结果。这项研究表明,使用e-就诊可能是一种可行的结果返回选项,以弥合面对面遗传咨询与通过在线门户接收结果之间的差距。