• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俯卧位脊柱手术术后视力丧失的知情同意:使临床实践符合法律标准。

Consent for post-operative visual loss in prone spinal surgery: aligning clinical practice with legal standards.

作者信息

Greenway Fay, Tulloch Isabel, Laban James

机构信息

Atkinson Morley Department of Neurosurgery, St George's Hospital, London, UK.

Department of Neurosurgery, King's College Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;32(6):604-609. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1519111. Epub 2018 Dec 18.

DOI:10.1080/02688697.2018.1519111
PMID:30560700
Abstract

In March 2015, the Supreme Court's landmark ruling on the common law case of Montgomery vs Lanarkshire Health Board established the doctrine of informed patient consent, setting the legal standards that doctors should abide by. In this review, our primary aim has been to establish whether, despite the well-publicised implications of the ruling in the legal community, the medical profession has altered its practice. To do this, we reviewed the consenting methods applied by surgeons within our field of neurosurgery. We chose the rare, but disabling, material risk of prone spinal surgery: post-operative visual loss (POVL), as our tool for assessment. Departmental and national surveys both identified a common theme - the vast majority of doctors consenting patients for prone spinal surgery either do not consider POVL to be a serious material risk, or alternatively are not aware that current legal standards require them to ensure that patients are made aware of material risk involved in their treatment. In light of this finding, we discuss the legal implications of the Montgomery ruling, the current regulatory guidance available to support doctors, suggest some strategies to align clinical practice with the legal standards advocated by the ruling, and highlight some of the challenges surrounding the consent process given the legal framework in which we now practice.

摘要

2015年3月,最高法院对蒙哥马利诉拉纳克郡健康委员会这起普通法案件作出具有里程碑意义的裁决,确立了患者知情同意原则,设定了医生应遵循的法律标准。在本综述中,我们的主要目的是确定,尽管该裁决在法律界的影响已广为人知,但医学界的做法是否有所改变。为此,我们回顾了神经外科领域外科医生采用的同意方法。我们选择了俯卧位脊柱手术罕见但会导致残疾的重大风险——术后视力丧失(POVL),作为我们的评估工具。部门和全国性调查都发现了一个共同主题——绝大多数为患者进行俯卧位脊柱手术的医生要么不认为POVL是严重的重大风险,要么不知道当前法律标准要求他们确保患者知晓其治疗中涉及的重大风险。鉴于这一发现,我们讨论了蒙哥马利裁决的法律影响、当前支持医生的监管指南,提出了一些使临床实践与该裁决所倡导的法律标准保持一致的策略,并强调了在我们目前所处的法律框架下,围绕同意过程存在的一些挑战。

相似文献

1
Consent for post-operative visual loss in prone spinal surgery: aligning clinical practice with legal standards.俯卧位脊柱手术术后视力丧失的知情同意:使临床实践符合法律标准。
Br J Neurosurg. 2018 Dec;32(6):604-609. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2018.1519111. Epub 2018 Dec 18.
2
Surgical consent practice in the UK following the Montgomery ruling: A national cross-sectional questionnaire study.蒙哥马利判决后英国的手术同意实践:全国横断面问卷调查研究。
Int J Surg. 2018 Jul;55:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.016. Epub 2018 May 26.
3
[Postoperative visual disturbances after non-ophthalmic surgery].[非眼科手术后的术后视觉障碍]
Masui. 2009 Aug;58(8):952-61.
4
'Montgomery consent': decision of the UK Supreme Court. Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board [20151. [2015] UKSC 11; [2015] WLR 768.“蒙哥马利同意原则”:英国最高法院的裁决。蒙哥马利诉拉纳克郡健康委员会案[2015年]。[2015]英国最高法院案例汇编第11号;[2015]《每周法律报告》第768页。
Pract Midwife. 2016 Jun;19(6):27-9.
5
National survey of UK Dermatologists demonstrates significant variation in how to obtain consent for dermatological procedures.英国皮肤科医生的全国性调查显示,在如何获得皮肤科手术同意方面存在显著差异。
Clin Exp Dermatol. 2020 Jul;45(5):576-579. doi: 10.1111/ced.14164. Epub 2020 Jan 19.
6
Edgar Mannheimer lecture. Termination, consent and innovation: ethical and legal aspects of paediatric cardiology.埃德加·曼海默讲座。终止、同意与创新:儿科心脏病学的伦理与法律问题
Cardiol Young. 1998 Oct;8(4):428-36. doi: 10.1017/s104795110000706x.
7
Postoperative Visual Loss Following Lumbar Spine Surgery: A Review of Risk Factors by Diagnosis.腰椎手术后的视力丧失:按诊断分类的危险因素综述
World Neurosurg. 2015 Dec;84(6):2010-21. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2015.08.030. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
8
Changes to the law on consent following Montgomery vs Lanarkshire Health Board.蒙哥马利诉拉纳克郡卫生局案后同意法的变更。
Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2016 Jun;77(6):355-7. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2016.77.6.355.
9
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
10
Not so new directions in the law of consent? Examining Montgomery v Lanarkshire Health Board.同意法则中并非全新的方向?审视蒙哥马利诉拉纳克郡卫生委员会案
J Med Ethics. 2016 Feb;42(2):85-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2015-102861. Epub 2015 Dec 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient Positioning in Spine Surgery: What Spine Surgeons Should Know?脊柱手术中的患者体位:脊柱外科医生应该知道什么?
Asian Spine J. 2023 Aug;17(4):770-781. doi: 10.31616/asj.2022.0320. Epub 2023 May 25.
2
Comparison of intraocular pressure during laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) versus transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) inguinal hernia repair.腹腔镜完全腹膜外(TEP)与经腹腹膜前(TAPP)腹股沟疝修补术中眼压比较。
Surg Endosc. 2022 Mar;36(3):2018-2024. doi: 10.1007/s00464-021-08487-x. Epub 2021 Apr 12.